Skip to main content

Google wants millions of dollars in costs from Oracle lawsuit

Lawsuits, as we already all know, can be very expensive indeed. How expensive, you may be wondering? Well, let’s take a look at the recent Oracle vs. Google lawsuit for a good – if somewhat surreal – guide to such things. As you may remember, Oracle had sued Google for patent and copyright infringement concerning APIs related to Google’s Android OS; the lawsuit was eventually ruled in Google’s favor, with a judge even going so far as to announce that the API structures that Oracle was claiming ownership to couldn’t actually be copyrighted after all.

Cut to the present day, and Google taking advantage of the rules of Federal Court that allow for the “prevailing party” in lawsuits to recover legal costs for the entire thing, absent attorney’s fees (Those are occasionally recoverable, but normally only in cases where the other side has been proven to have engaged in some kind of legal misconduct, which clearly wasn’t the case here). In realistic terms, that means that Google is allowed to ask for costs relating to things like deposition of witnesses, the creation of and annotation of transcripts, document- and other information gathering, and other such necessary ingredients to the preparation of a lawsuit. Given that the legal battle between Google and Oracle lasted all of six weeks, what kind of amount would you estimate Google would ask for?

Those who said “Just over $4,000,000,” give yourself a pat on the back.

In papers filed yesterday, the search giant asked for $4,030,000 in costs from the trial. For the curious, that amount breaks down in the following manner:

  • $2.9 million for the processing and duplicating of documents
  • $987,000 to pay for the court-appointed damages expert (One half of the expert’s entire fee; Oracle pays the other half)
  • $143,000 for transcript costs

Everyone who finds themselves wondering whether that transcript cost seems high, here’re some further details that might help you figure that out: According to Google, sixty witnesses were deposed in preparation for the trial, with many deposed more than once. Making an assumption that there was somewhere in the region of 100 depositions carried out, that puts the cost per deposition at $1,430 – which almost seems somewhat reasonable, if you consider how long such depositions could range (That said, I am still giving serious though about getting into the transcript business).

The $2,900,000 in processing and duplicating of documents was further broken down by the company: “More than” 86 sources produced more than 97 million documents for the case, with an outside firm – FTI Inc. – retained to search through said documents for pertinent material, which were then transferred to TIFF format for use by Oracle. In total, Google shared more than 3.3 million documents, for a total in the region of 20 million pages.

Of course, that $4,030,000 figure doesn’t include lawyer fees, remember; those are estimated in the tens of millions. So, how much does a lawsuit cost, even if you win? The answer is clearly a lot of money.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Graeme McMillan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
A transplant from the west coast of Scotland to the west coast of America, Graeme is a freelance writer with a taste for pop…
Apple, Samsung, and Google could learn a lot from this unique phone
The Huawei P60 Pro held in a person's hand.

Apple, Samsung, and Google could all learn something from Huawei’s latest flagship smartphone, as it’s one of the best-looking, most ergonomic, and tantalizingly unique mobile devices I’ve seen and held in ages.

Above is the Huawei P60 Pro, and the stunning finish is called Rococo Pearl. Here's what makes it special — and why I'd love to see other companies take such care.
A long history of great design

Read more
The U.K. wants to break up Google and Apple’s cloud gaming stranglehold
Playing Diablo Immortal on the Asus ROG Phone 5.

The U.K.'s Competition and Market Authority (CMA) is opening an investigation into Apple and Google's dominance of the mobile browser and cloud gaming markets, the body announced today. Both companies could face fines and additional regulation if found guilty of anticompetitive behavior.

The investigation comes as a result of a consultation the body had launched in June, finding that Apple and Google's duopoly on mobile allowed them to control not just operating systems, but app stores and web browsers. The CMA says that both companies controlled 97% of all mobile browsing experiences in the U.K. in 2021 and notes that they could effectively control cloud gaming through browser restrictions. The consultation revealed support from browser vendors and cloud gaming service providers who claim to be limited by the duopoly, with about 86% requesting for an in-depth investigation.

Read more
Google to pay $392 million to 40 states in location-tracking settlement
4 ways 2020 has changed how i use my tech google maps in hand

Google has agreed to pay $391.5 million to 40 U.S. states to settle a dispute over location tracking.

The tech giant misled its users into believing they had turned off location tracking in their account settings, when Google actually continued to collect their location information, the Oregon Department of Justice (DoJ) said in a post on its website on Monday, November 14.

Read more