Skip to main content

Amazon cuts cost of hit songs to 69 cents

amazon mp3 logoSong downloads are cheap these days by any standards. And now they’ve just got a little bit cheaper.

In what’s being seen by many as a bold move, Amazon has just knocked 20 cents off the cost of some of its MP3s in a bid to wrestle some of the music download business away from Apple, whose iTunes store currently dominates the market. The reduced price means that the e-commerce giant is now offering some top-selling songs for the bargain bucket price of just 69 cents.

A report in the LA Times points out that Amazon’s market share of the business has been languishing for the last two years at about 10 percent, whereas Apple’s iTunes continues to enjoy a share of some 70 percent.

Time will tell if the price cut creates some new loyal customers and causes a shift in the market. Speaking to the Times, Russ Crupnick, a digital music analyst at the NPD Group, said, “The average music consumer spends $46 a year on digital music, which is half of what it was last year. The question is not whether you can sell a 69-cent track. It’s whether you can get a customer to spend $69.”

Amazon are clearly intent on trying to upset the Apple music cart – the price cut comes off the back of Amazon’s recent launch of its cloud-based music locker service in March (something which Apple has yet to offer, though may be coming soon), though admittedly that service has been experiencing some problems of late.

The songs available for 69 cents at Amazon’s music store include recent releases such as Lady Gaga’s Judas, Kelly Rowland’s Motivation and Gorillaz’ Revolving Doors. The same songs are selling on Apple’s iTunes store for $1.29.

Let’s wait and see if Amazon’s latest move attracts any music lovers from the iTunes store, or if indeed whether Apple starts making some price cuts of its own, signalling the start of a price war.

Editors' Recommendations

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more