Skip to main content

Amazon woes prove we can’t have blind faith in the cloud

cloud crashAs Amazon’s cloud catastrophe stretches into day five, you can just feel the “I told you so’s” about to make an appearance. The cloud has been getting a lot of attention recently, largely thanks to Google and Apple’s forthcoming digital music services, and with the hype has come plenty of skepticism.

Amazon was able to restore service for the majority of its cloud customers but even today is still experiencing some issues. According to Amazon’s service health dashboard, some accounts are being held up by its elastic block storage (EBS) service, resulting in slow site performance. CRN reports that Amazon attributed most of the problems to this glitch: “As we posted last night, EBS is now operating normally for all APIs and recovered EBS volumes. The vast majority of affected volumes have now been recovered. We’re in the process of contacting a limited number of customers who have EBS volumes that have not yet recovered and will continue to work hard on restoring these remaining volumes.”

While Amazon’s cloud storage debacle is coming to a close, there’s ample opportunity for repeat scenarios out there. We’re seeing a variety of cloud-based services coming out of the woodwork: It’s not just always-accessible music and video streaming in our midst either; there are cloud-dependent devices like Google’s Cr-48 notebook. With the cloud come undeniable benefits, but as with anything new and innovative, there are some things to worry about. The last few days have underscored two major cloud vulnerabilities.

Privacy

It’s universally accepted that if you want to keep something a secret, don’t let it within 10 feet of the Internet. Dropbox has lost some user confidence lately for not thoroughly explaining its privacy policy when though it provides a home for millions of users’ data and documents. Saving something to the cloud means you’re sacrificing just a little control over its whereabouts, a scary idea depending on what you’re saving. If it’s the occasional file, like a resume or family photo, there isn’t too much to worry about. But if you’re deferring to the cloud as your storage weapon of choice, you know that you’re taking at least a small security risk.

Of course, everyone’s information is up for grabs. Even if you don’t have an Internet connection and the FBI wants to get its hands on your files, it will obtain a warrant and seize your computer. That just involves a few more steps. Criminals can break into your home and take your social security card if they really want to – just like a determined hacker could possibly get to something you’ve saved with a cloud-storage system. The PlayStation Network has been down for days now after being hacked and there’s concern user identity and information is in danger. That’s just the reality of the situation.

Outages

Recent events have brought this concern into focus. Various websites saw their sites go without service for days, a frustrating and costly experience. And there’s the distinct possibility that as these cloud-based options grow in popularity, there will be discount services. Services that might not have the capacity to meet demand, and then you’ve got a recipe for outages on your hand. It could simply mean you can’t get to your media library for a few days and you’ll have to wait to listen to your music or watch your movies until the site is functioning. Or you could lose access to work documents or flight information that you’ve saved to the cloud only.

These aren’t entirely unexpected, but they are manifesting somewhat rapidly as the cloud trend catches on. It’s enough to reaffirm your belief in external hard drives – not that ours ever wavered.

Editors' Recommendations

Molly McHugh
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more