With the iPhone 5 on the horizon, the sun may soon set on two of Apple’s long-time staples, the iPod shuffle and iPod classic.
According to TUAW, an unnamed source claims Apple will discontinue the two iPods, with the space being filled by the iPod nano and iPod touch. As Apple watchers may have noticed, we’ve heard a lot of about the next iPhone(s), but almost nothing about updates iPod line, save some rumblings about the release of a white iPod touch.
Speculation about the death of the two iPod offerings are supported by Apple’s vague claims of a “product transition” this year, which the company mentioned during its most recent earnings call.
While relatively few customers may mourn the death of the shuffle and classic iPods, the move appears to make business sense. The iPod shuffle is really nothing more than an iPod nano, without the convenient touchscreen. And the classic, which is 10-years-old this year, does little more than play music – something the iPod touch does just as well, plus the added benefit of being able to download games and other apps.
Then there’s the rise of the iPhone, which satisfies both the need for an MP3 player and a smartphone. If Apple offers a less-expensive iPhone this year, either in the form of a new iPhone 4S or a price-reduced iPhone 4, then its likely even more customers will be swayed in that direction, away from a low-end iPod option.
Of course, the primary downside to the elimination of the shuffle and classic is that the least expensive new iPod would jump from $49 (shuffle) to $149 (nano). Unless, of course, Apple drops the price on the nano, but nobody’s saying that, at least not in the tech press, so we can’t even guess that that’s a possibility.
What do you think, should Apple continue to produce the iPod shuffle and classic, or has their time past?

storage capacity is the issue, for me…
I can see both the classic and the shuffle going. The new iPod nano is basically a shuffle with a screen on it. The shuffle is redundant at this point.
I am thinking that if Apple is going to get rid of the Classic, then they need a Touch with a very large capacity. 64 GB just isn’t large enough for some use’s libraries.
I have lusted for the iPod Touch since I first saw it and would be the proud owner of one now BUT for the glaring issue of the Classic’s 160GB of space vs the sad little 64GB on the largest Touch. If they want to bump up the size i’d be the first on board. I’d like to see the Touch more rugged too. My Classic takes a licking and ….