Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster gave some insight to investors Tuesday on what he expects to see from Apple in the TV market.

The rumors have been strong about Apple’s TV concept coming to market in the near future, but like usual, we have nothing from the company to confirm whether or not those plans are really in the making. According to Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster, Apple has indeed been contacting component suppliers, which has led Munster to believe that an Apple-branded TV set could land in 2012. In a letter [via Forbes] on January 31, Munster told investors that he had spoken to one “major TV component supplier” that had been contacted by Apple about creating a connected HDTV. 

While Munster sees this as continued evidence that Apple is indeed planning to release a smart TV as early as late 2012, there’s skepticism about whether the company would even enter the market without a revolutionary idea to bolster an Apple TV set. Even Munster agreed that while the indicators are there, if Apple does not have a way to bring innovation to the somewhat fragmented connected TV market, the company may not enter the market at all. 

Munster also offered some thoughts on the various ways that Apple could offer a new smart TV solution to consumers. He outlined three different scenarios. 

The first is that Apple could enter the TV market by offering a DVR/TiVo-like management system of controlling programming that users would still get via their cable provider. This would be something relatively familiar to consumers, but Apple could additionally offer things like iTunes movie and series rentals directly through the TV. 

The second option that Munster details is that Apple could offer users live network television as well as a series of web-based services that could come in the form of video apps like Netflix and Hulu Plus. This interface could include many other apps as well as content from the iTunes store. 

The last option is that Apple could go for controlling the whole television experience by offering monthly subscriptions to users based on the kind of content that they are looking for, much like current cable providers. This could be difficult when licensing deals come into play, but it would be the most closed, Apple-heavy interface, which the company has veered toward before. 

Based on the current information (or lack thereof), we’d be surprised if an Apple TV made it into consumers’ hands by the end of the year. It’s hard to know just what Apple might be working on and how far along they could be, but we think that they’ll have to come up with something better than simply integrating iTunes into a user interface to really take the connected TV market by storm. Users haven’t seemed to enthused by the idea of purchasing movies and series episodes individually, and we don’t think that will be changing any time soon. 

Showing 25 comments

  1. Richard Wills at 9:23am 3rd February 2012 remember people it's just television,and with the crap that is put on for entertainment these days don't waste your money on a new tv from a monopolizing company like apple...
  2. Richard Wills at 5:13am 3rd February 2012 I myself have a dedicated computer for internet tv,I have an hp amd 2 quad core 645 with 6 gigs ram,I run ubuntu 10.4 and have boxee for linux installed,I also have a roku box for netflix. I can go to firstrowsports to watch every sporting event,on boxee I can watch every movie or tv show ever made. there are other websites that show tv series and movies from the past. So, apple isn't doing any thing new in the way of tv rebroadcasting that hasn't been done before...
  3. Richard Wills at 5:01am 3rd February 2012 I've had all the tv types:cable,sat. and at&t uverse and they are all the same,plus there is a tuner that you buy for the boxee box that all you can get is over the air broadcasts,You can only go to the networks web site to watch episodes of the programs they cary and not live tv, apple unless they get the right to broad cast live tv from all the networks to show live tv everyone is better going to sites like hulu,or using boxee on a computer because that is what I do.
  4. Richard Wills at 4:35am 3rd February 2012 just another monopoly trying to get into the tv game...
  5. Geoffrey Shauger at 4:26am 3rd February 2012 and then millions of sheep will act like Apple invented the TV
  6. Kurtis Kronk at 2:59am 3rd February 2012 Here's the problem I see... most of us are getting our internet through the same provider as our TV's programming. Let's say that Apple reinvents cable-TV as we know it today and everything is done on-demand through the internet. Well, how long is it going to take before we start getting throttled internet or before internet rates go way up, period. Unless they become internet providers, I don't know how much weight they have to revolutionize that industry. It's a little more complicated than the music industry.
    1. Ian Bell at 8:04pm 2nd February 2012 @Kurtis,I understand where you are coming from, but this is Apple we are talking about. If anyone can invent something cool, or revolutionize an existing market space, it's them.I use Vudu at home and stream HD video with Master HD/DTS audio over my FiOS connection no problem, and without any buffering. And if Netflix can stream video to millions, there is no reason why Apple can't.
  7. kayak__guy at 4:59pm 2nd February 2012 Consumers are demanding larger TV's (ie Sharp 80"), can Apple really compete in the large TV market? Also, Apple always charges a premium for their products, how will they be able command a premium in a market where consumers are pressuring retailers and manufacturers to constantly lower their price (see Best Buy financial results where consumer pressures have negatively impacted their margins). I have several Apple products and while they are innovative; can they go after the large TV market and effectively compete???
    1. Ian Bell at 5:32pm 2nd February 2012 I totally agree, Apple would have to offer something truly amazing if they want to get away with charging that much money.
  8. Matt Bolt at 10:43pm 2nd February 2012 AppleTV has yet to go 1080p. Why go where other companies (Sony, etc) are struggling? Stick with what your making money on. Push the envelope on appleTV. Make that thing blow everyone away. Then drop it in a flat panel OLED Gorilla glass television.
  9. Christopher Vokey at 9:51pm 2nd February 2012 they need to drop the ''i'' concept now its getting lame.
    1. iMan at 3:17pm 2nd February 2012 It's not lame. Instead of saying Apple TV it's just names iTV or Apple Phone u would just say iPhone. Shorter and catchier.
  10. David Peopleschampion Green at 9:51pm 2nd February 2012 lol a full channel Digital tv Subscription where i live is only €28,50 max.
  11. Ian Bell at 1:48pm 2nd February 2012 Ok, here is my wild guess as to what Apple is going to do with their iTV product. Everyone seems to be focused on the TV hardware/specs and iTunes, but I think Apple is going to blow everyone away.I bet they replace cable companies altogether. And assuming you have a good internet connection, I bet Apple will have their own TV shows complete with subscription etc, just like a traditional cable company. The set top box goes bye bye.Anyone think Apple is capable of doing this!?
    1. Rhys Lloyd at 2:26pm 2nd February 2012 Yes.The hardware/specs would be something like a high-end Panasonic panel or alike. I imagine everything would be content on-demand. No DVR, no waiting. You watch what you want, when you want it. Naturally it's fully integrated into the iSuite; photos, videos, music etc.They have dabbled with bits of this before... anyone remember the late Front Row?
      1. Ian Bell at 3:17pm 2nd February 2012 Oh yeah.They would need to literally have live TV for sporting events etc though. I wonder if they could pull it off.
  12. David Peopleschampion Green at 9:35pm 2nd February 2012 if its more expenive then anything compareable, yes!
  13. Michelle Frances Carlin at 9:33pm 2nd February 2012 Flop
  14. Lucas Meyer at 9:33pm 2nd February 2012 It will be a success to apple fans as it says apple on it.
    1. iMan at 2:13pm 2nd February 2012 FYI it will NOT say Apple on it. Apple tends to put their logo on the product, even the Apple Stores; they don't say "Apple Store" they just have the Apple logo because everyone knows that means Apple.
  15. Digital Trends at 9:32pm 2nd February 2012 It will likely have a Thunderbolt connection only. Kidding!
    1. Rhys Lloyd at 2:29pm 2nd February 2012 That probably makes more sense than you think... I imagine Apple begrudgingly pays for the HDMI interface on Apple TV purely as a necessity.Although I imagine el-Jobso had visions of completely wireless. On that... whatever happened to wireless HDMI? I was sure we'd have it by now... or do the brands like Belkin have too much weight in this field?
  16. Kurtis Kronk at 9:26pm 2nd February 2012 Watch them produce the glossiest TV ever with only proprietary inputs.
  17. Rusty Shackleford at 11:26am 2nd February 2012 My money is on Apple going with option #3: Lock the doors, seal the exits, get consumers to start coughing up cash directly to them for subscription content. Apple could still charge a boatload and manage to undercut cable companies, which have gotten so unbelievably fat and happy in their regional monopolies that they're slated to become the next record companies. Apple could demand $50 a month for a subscription and still look cheap next to most premium packages from Time Warner, Comcast, etc.
    1. Rhys Lloyd at 2:23pm 2nd February 2012 My money is on that we won't see an Apple-branded TV this year. Maybe not even next year. I don't think Apple are going to rush into this one too quickly; they need to get it right the first time. It would be far too big of a deal to eff-it up. However they do need to introduce it whilst they've still got everyone hooked on iTunes and iDevices (and the endless list of third party devices supporting the iDevices).But yes, the most likely option is #3. Apple likes to take a slice of everyone's pie, no matter the media. Hard to imagine they'll take any other approach for this system. Although I do imagine that Apple would want to revolutionise the whole way we watch TV, and it would likely (in my opinion with no research whatsoever) content on-demand, without the need to record it to a DVR first.
Close Suggestion Does the next iPod Nano really need a camera?
View Article