Apple-branded TVs, PSP games on the iPhone and a flaming pile of wreckage where Blu-ray used to stand could all be in the future, for a hypothetical Sony under the command of Steve Jobs.

The financial powerhouse Barron’s recently issued a report suggesting that Apple was looking at taking over Sony. From company culture clashes, to the complexity that Sony would represent given Steve Jobs’ massive focus on simplicity, I really doubt he’d want to do this. In fact, it’s only a thread of a rumor and there’s a ninety-nine percent chance it will never happen. But let’s put aside whether he would or not, because stranger things have happened. Who would have thought Palm or Compaq would end up as part of HP, that Apple would build a product like the iPod before they did it, or that Darth Vader would actually be Luke Skywalker’s father?

I bring up this last past because Sony, in a way, was the illegitimate father of the new Apple, because Steve admired Sony so much in the early years. I doubt, back then, he even imagined that his company would grow to eclipse this aging giant. But setting aside whether this is likely, what would Steve do to Sony, and why shouldn’t Sony do this to themselves anyway?

Deconstructing Apple

One of the first things Steve Jobs did when taking over Apple was eliminate most of the complexity. He got rid of most of the accessories, like digital cameras and printers, eliminated the Newton, killed off their corporate products, eliminated their clone efforts, and took the company back to basics. This was because the company had become an unmanageable mess, and he needed to take it back to its roots in order to grow a better company. This approach was pretty unique; most folks would have stepped into the CEO role and tried to patch things up. Had Steve done that instead, we likely would be talking about Apple in the past tense, and not the most successful company in the tech market at the moment.


Steve Jobs eliminated Apple’s Newton and their line of digital cameras

Deconstructing Sony

Where do you even start picking apart this 64-year-old electronics goliath? Steve would likely start from where he thinks the company’s Sony’s core is, which is TVs, stereos, and game systems. He’d probably try to sell the movie business to Disney, and find a buyer for the professional cameras and content creation, or shut it down. Since he isn’t a fan of gaming, and the PSP competes with the iPod, he’d likely shut this down as well, because spinning it out might create future problems. However he might take the content side of this and retain it for iPads, iPhones, and iPod Touch products, which could turn the shutdown into more of a migration. He’d dramatically simplify the TV and stereo lines while eliminating any work on phones that competed with the iPhone. He would likely eliminate Blu-ray, because after some initial support, he now sees it as a train wreck and has lost faith.

He would then enhance Sony’s TV and stereo lines to make them work seamlessly with iTunes and Apple MP3 players. He’d immediately kill, however, the work with Google on Google TV, both because it competes with AppleTV and he doesn’t like Google very much.


Sony product timeline, courtesy of Gizmodo

Here is the big question: Would he retain the Sony brand? It is one of the most powerful in the industry, but Steve likes simplicity and would likely be annoyed by a product called the Apple Sony HDTV. My guess is that he wouldn’t, and would migrate the Sony brand to Apple over time.

Dealing with culture issues might be difficult, but Jobs has one major rule and that is there is only one boss, and that is Jobs. Japanese business culture can actually align with this, and after being cut to the bone and cross pollinated with a lot of Apple executives, I doubt if much Sony-only culture would remain. Steve has no trouble firing people, and his fear-based management style could actually be very successful in what was left of Sony. Disputes aren’t uncommon in Apple, but if they damage execution Jobs has no sense of humor and would eliminate those he thought were the problem. A couple of examples and the remaining Sony employees would likely toe the Steve Jobs line.

An Apple-Sony Merger: Potentially cool, but very unlikely

The end result of Steve’s pruning would be a much smaller Sony, more similar to the way it was in the ‘60s than today. But he would have a solid foundation from which to build a new media powerhouse, and the end result, after five to 10 years, could eclipse the reach and scope of the current Apple significantly, and maybe even firms like GE and Samsung.

So why doesn’t Sony just do this?

Because making a company vastly smaller only to rebuild later it dramatically cuts short term revenues and profits. Steve Jobs could weather this, but no other CEO likely could, which is why most would rather patch an leaky ship than rebuild it from scratch. It may be somewhat ironic that the only person who could turn Sony into a company that could again challenge Apple is Steve Jobs, and worse; that as obvious as that path to success is, Sony can’t take it without him.

Showing 22 comments

  1. 3rjw3r30q at 8:25am 30th October 2010 Just the thought of this makes me hate Apple, and I'm typing this on a macbook pro. I would burn my computer and iPhone if Apple even THOUGHT of this.
  2. zl1killa at 4:44am 29th October 2010 agreed with the starbucks dominos comment. I do have apple products, I however like my open-ness with DROID and with my windows 7 pc. I absolutely despise Apples .flac files and having to burn my music to CD to do any damn thing with it. I also wish that car manufacturers, specifically GM would get their asses together and have interfaces for Ipods etc. If Apple bought sony, they would slaughter the company and its rep. they need to stay seperate.
  3. aadsf at 11:37pm 28th October 2010 Silly and waste of time article. Each company runs in vastly different markets. It'd be like asking what would happen if Starbucks bought Dominos. You'd only end up paying 3x as much for a pizza, and limited to just one topping haha.
  4. Dustin at 9:51pm 28th October 2010 This is a scary thought. I love my Sony Bravia hooked up to my HTPC. When google tv hits the shelfs I will likely put one in the bedroom. I've had a mac before. I've had an iphone before. I've had an ipod before. The MSI laptop I have was better than any mac; My HTC Evo is better than any iphone and I know its an unpopular statement but the Zune was soo much better than the ipod. I do still use itunes to ORGANIZE my music and quicktime of course but those are the only apple software on my computer. I
  5. Steve Knobs at 9:09pm 28th October 2010 Thanks for another waste of time article. It's bad enough we have to hear about Crapple all the time but now you are just making stuff up.
  6. Logan Lindquist at 8:22pm 28th October 2010 Great article Rob. Good to see it on Digg. What you don't mention is Sony Music which is like 2nd largest music publisher. If Apple started publishing their own music instead of relying on record labels they could charge a lot less for it! That would be amazing for the music industry. More money for the artists. More selection for the customers. I think Sony would be a great fit for the company and I would applaud any efforts to kill the Sony brand. :) SCREW THE RIAA
  7. midnightdsob at 7:14pm 28th October 2010 i'd rather see google buy sony....google has a lot of software engineers but not so hot on the hardware. Google also lacks Sony's design aesthetic as great as the products are technically. Google's network would make a great backbone for getting content to the PSP and PS3. Google would also get some high end content for youtube and google tv distro.
  8. ore masta at 1:22pm 28th October 2010 it would be the applecolypse.
  9. Mxyzptlk at 7:45am 28th October 2010 Sony new PSP smart phone is running Android on it, NOT iOS. Not going to happen.
    1. Ludicrous at 9:53am 28th October 2010 That is a totally irrelevant consideration, deals as large as one like Apple/Sony would never come down to insignificant details such as what OS some tiny mobile gaming platform runs.
  10. John B Maher at 7:31am 28th October 2010 Terrible! if this happens then I would have to stop buying Sony also, How can any one sane person say that iTunes is anything but a resource hog with no user control which gets right to the heart of the issue Mr Jobs doesn't like the user, his point of view is it's not your product it's mine your just using it for a while. BAD BAD BAD! I really hope this is all just rumor because life would suck if it were true, I mean Sony sucks enough as it is, we don't need apple in there to.
    1. Assaad at 7:50am 28th October 2010 100%!
  11. ZungHow at 7:15am 28th October 2010 If that happened, then Sony would be cool! anonymize.it.tc
  12. anon at 6:16am 28th October 2010 You take care of the broadcast wing of Sony (a huge player in broadcast for 20 + years) in a half a sentence. It really seems as if you are looking at this from merely a consumer products reference point.
  13. Hardeep Singh at 6:04am 28th October 2010 So the article basically suggests, Apple will buy Sony and destroy everything part by part and finally stop using the Sony name as well. What's the point of buying it then? Companies acquire other companies only if they can benefit from its resources, not to destroy them.
  14. Jim Sievers at 2:31pm 27th October 2010 Sony's Music Publishing would do well housed within the ITunes environment.
  15. Christopher Tropicana at 1:50pm 27th October 2010 I would like for Apple to make televisions. Those Mac book Pros have great looking screens. I would definitely buy one. Quality over quantity.
    1. ioman at 1:54pm 27th October 2010 Agreed. Apple's own version of Google TV with their Apple TV built in etc.
    2. Kevin at 1:15am 29th October 2010 Should have bought a Pioneer Kuro when they were available. Nothing compares nearly 2 years later.
  16. Dimitri at 1:23pm 27th October 2010 Actually the Sony brand would be a massive part of the company's price, which is why an apple sony merger is unlikely. Anyone who bought Sony would balk at eliminating such a large part of the investment value. Conversely, this makes Sony too expensive for an acquisition like the one described here. There is one thing though. Sony is one of the companies that most closely matches steve jobs' ideal of "insanely great products". If apple wanted to buy an electronics giant, a briliant but troubled company like Sony would be a better candidate than most. Assuming steve wants to pay that insane price ab Nd then burn through most of it.
    1. ioman at 1:45pm 27th October 2010 Lots of great points. Former Apple CEO John Sculley mentions in his book that when Apple was a young company, Steve Jobs was obsessed with Sony as a company and the products they manufactured. ". I think if you look at the Japanese consumer electronics in that era they were all analog companies. The one that Steve admired was Sony. We used to go visit Akio Morita and he had really the same kind of high-end standards that Steve did and respect for beautiful products. I remember Akio Morita gave Steve and me each one of the first Sony Walkmans. None of us had ever seen anything like that before because there had never been a product like that. This is 25 years ago and Steve was fascinated by it. The first thing he did with his was take it apart and he looked at every single part. How the fit and finish was done, how it was built. He was fascinated by the Sony factories. We went through them. They would have different people in different colored uniforms. Some would have red uniforms, some green, some blue, depending on what their functions were. It was all carefully thought out and the factories were spotless. Those things made a huge impression on him. The Mac factory was exactly like that. They didn’t have colored uniforms, but it was every bit as elegant as the early Sony factories that we saw. Steve’s point of reference was Sony at the time. He really wanted to be Sony. He didn’t want to be IBM. He didn’t want to be Microsoft. He wanted to be Sony. The challenge was in that era you couldn’t build digital products like Sony. Everything was analog and the Japanese companies approached things and you can read Prahalad’s book, from University of Michigan, he studied it. (Note: Sculley is referring to C.K. Prahalad’s “Competing for the Future” (1994)) The Japanese always started with the market share of components first. So one would dominate, let’s say sensors and someone else would dominate memory and someone else hard drive and things of that sort. They would then build up their market strengths with components and then they would work towards the final product. That was fine with analog electronics where you are trying to focus on cost reduction — and whoever controlled the key component costs was at an advantage. It didn’t work at all for digital electronics because digital electronics you’re starting at the wrong end of the value chain. You are not starting with the components. You are not starting with the user experience."
  17. Dingus at 12:47pm 27th October 2010 Ha! Apple doesn't have enough money to buy Sony, dream on! Er, wait a minute....
Close Suggestion Best NBA iPhone apps for getting your mobile basketball fix
View Article