Microsoft actually has a chance of besting Android with Windows Phone 7, if it can overcome the amazingly clumsy name.

Next week, Microsoft’s Windows Phone 7 products officially launch, and we’ll know whether they have another Zune or another Xbox on their hands. Microsoft’s luck with consumer products range from the first Zune, which was a well-funded failure, to the Xbox, which was surprisingly successful, and we could toss in Windows Vista and Windows 7 as additional bad-to-good examples. I’ve looked at Windows Phone 7 now at length, and I think it could be a player, if it can just get over its name. Let’s explore that.

Zune

I was very excited about Microsoft’s first Zune, until I saw it. Microsoft had done a lot of things that made music more social that limited the related cost, and made it easier to discover, which Apple had not. The retailers hated Apple because the firm was not only too controlling, but had opened stores that competed with them and got favorable treatment with regard to inventory. Microsoft had a rich accessory line, and for once, a marketing budget.

However, when I saw the device, I was dumbfounded, because it looked like a square turd to me (it was even brown). I asked, hoping to be right, whether it was a hardware mule, and the cool-looking product was still under development. I was horrified to find out they actually planned to try to sell the brown turd, and was told that brown was the new black (how wrong they were).

I must have appeared to be in shock, because the Microsoft executive laughed and said, “You know, we are Microsoft, and it does take us three times to get something right.” His departure from Microsoft was not voluntary as you can imagine.

Current-generation Zunes are vastly more attractive, but they are no real competition for Apple, and likely just are a hedge for Apple against successful monopoly problems.

Xbox

Xbox was more of a different beast, driven by people who loved gaming. It came to market more loaded, with vastly better marketing. While initially the design was more driven by cost considerations than beauty, that wasn’t unusual for that market. And Apple wasn’t in it.

Here, the offering was much more complete, and the new Xbox is arguably the best-looking gaming system on the planet. Granted, it helped a lot that Sony horribly messed up the PS3 by massively overshooting cost limits and darned near putting itself under. At one point the PS3 was both overpriced, and selling at an estimated $600+ loss per system.

Still, Microsoft got the online side of its product fixed more quickly, and as Sony made its products less attractive to conserve cost, Microsoft made its more attractive, creating a disparity that seems to be favoring Xbox sales now over both PlayStation and Nintendo. While we could argue whether Microsoft is now the leader in this market, there is no doubt the company is a serious player, and that is what it needs to be in the smartphone segment.

Windows Phone 7

Windows Phone 7Coming into the launch, Microsoft has a number of potential advantages. It has a rumored marketing launch budget that exceeds Apple’s, its user interface is more graphics rich and new than either the iPhone’s or Android’s native interface and it is more consistent across different hardware than Android. The phones will be on more carriers than just AT&T, and they will come in a variety of designs, not just one. However, they need to provide one more thing – and that is status. However, they only need to provide more than the Android platform provided initially, not the iPhone, and that may be doable.

Google does virtually no marketing or real demand generation for its products and relies entirely on the carriers or device manufactures for that, and these folks often have little in the way of budget. Google is under increasing pressure to bring costs in line with revenues, making it very difficult for it to fund a marketing campaign at Microsoft’s or Apple’s level.

Finally, when it comes to product placement in TV and movies , Microsoft has risen to challenge Apple’s efforts in this area. It is hard to find a show on TV that doesn’t have the Windows logo on most, if not all of the PC hardware on screen. This would have an even bigger impact with smartphones and does with iPhones common in media today.

Could it come down to name?

I actually think Microsoft could surprise Google, and maybe even scare Apple this time, except for one nagging doubt. The name “Windows Phone 7” just doesn’t feel cool to me. I can see people say with pride they own an iPhone, or even an Android phone, but, “Hey, check out my Windows Phone 7 phone!” just sounds lame.

I’ve tried “WP7 phone,” which is better, but I haven’t seen the platform positioned that way. And while you could drop back to the phone name itself, “Check out my HTC Kraken,” it is Microsoft that has the marketing budget, not HTC. As a result, strangely enough, I think the success of this phone will be directly related to whether Microsoft can get around the name of its platform, and make the devices sound cool so buyers can tell others, with pride, about their purchase.

So going back to the Xbox, which wasn’t called “Windows XP Embedded with Gaming,” Microsoft’s success will be directly related to how people talk about the Windows Phone 7 products they buy, and how little they say the words “Windows Phone 7.” Let’s just say I don’t envy the person who owns Windows Phone 7 marketing. We’ll revisit this next week after the launch.

Showing 39 comments

  1. Jim at 1:47pm 22nd December 2010 what about POS phone?
  2. Vince P. at 4:41pm 29th November 2010 My vote is for WinPhone, WinFōn, or Zone; any of which works with a '7' at the end. Those all work great. And yes, the stupid name matters (unfortunately). But yeah, 'Windows Phone 7'? That's gotta go.
  3. mim at 10:08pm 15th November 2010 nah he finished at the end with a strong point agreeing wth crazed lol
  4. jay at 10:03am 27th October 2010 WiP or WiP7
  5. AjBernard at 8:59pm 22nd October 2010 Two names they should have considered: WinPhone (aka Windows Phone) Zone (aka Zune Phone)
  6. guest at 9:39pm 19th October 2010 Great points. I really think Microsoft failed marketing 101 here. What they don't seem to see, is that the name "Windows Phone 7" is not only unappealing, it's uncool. They need to create the "really cool" factor to make the product successful. Not having "Microsoft" or "Windows" in the name is necessary for it to be cool. The name, the look, and features all have to be cool. They also completely miss that designing the phone itself (hardware) is important. Sure, they can sell more operating systems in more different phones made by different manufacturers. But, who will buy their phones then, in this competitive market? I'd much rather buy a Blackberry or Iphone.
  7. @Dahveed1 at 7:02am 13th October 2010 The weakness I heard was the limited number of apps. MS has dismissed this as not important. I find this interesting as MS used to bash Apple on the smaller number of applications for Apple's computers vs. the window platform. Now the shoe is on the other foot.
  8. bill at 10:56pm 12th October 2010 How about WiFone ?
  9. TheMan at 7:48pm 11th October 2010 So let me get this straight. The writer thinks that the success of Windows Phone 7 (WP7) rests not on its specs, interface, app library, developer support and/or sales but on having a cool sounding NAME? LMAO. Also, LMAO at calling WP7's simple one colored tiles on the home screen (that look like they were made in MS-paint) and absurdly basic text and line based layouts (as seen inside the native email client and calendar, the latter consisting of just a grid with grey lines on a plain black background...super impressive for a complete newbie just learning HTML writing) as being "more graphics rich than either the iphone or android." Gosh, you're horrible at visual, in particular, aesthetic comprehension. Either that or you're just plain great at smoking that pipe.
  10. GenX at 9:28am 10th October 2010 if i were to name it, it'll just be "se7en" or "7Win" (sounds kinda like seven) ;)
  11. san at 9:38pm 9th October 2010 SevenForTheWin Phone
  12. chris20 at 3:47pm 9th October 2010 I call it windows mobile 7.
  13. Zed at 3:47pm 9th October 2010 How about VistaPhone ;-)
  14. FJC at 7:37am 9th October 2010 Lol I guess I did come explain it the wrong way. Basically the name won't matter if there is hype and marketing put behind WP7.
  15. Mads at 8:49pm 8th October 2010 Phone7 works.
  16. Dillio at 6:45pm 8th October 2010 Good post, Scott V. I'd stick with Xphone. But Microsoft might stick to a model where the name of the OS on the phone won't be the name of the phone. You won't buy a Windows Phone 7. You will buy a... Samsung Triton, or something.
  17. Marco2631 at 12:23pm 8th October 2010 I think can be nice Wphone7
  18. Dan at 9:07am 8th October 2010 How about Windows X-Series
  19. Scott V at 8:43am 8th October 2010 As a person who works in branding, this is a familiar problem. A big bloated bureaucratic company that is insecure will force its name onto everything, -in the most awkward ways. Series 7 is good, 7 Series is better because it can be said faster. (say both 5 times fast). But I think its still a mistake to have a name that goes obsolete. A successful brand is a timeless brand. Xphone is DARN cool. "Zune Phone" or better yet just "Zune" Lets face it, X's and Z's are always cool letters! probably because of underuse, -tho I don't know why Q isn't so cool then. The biggest thing it has going for it is the "7", because people think its lucky and (I'm convinced) because it looks like a "Z". Microsoft made a HUGE mistake with such an incredibly crappy name, it is long, uninspired, tries too hard and has built in obsolescence. But I doubt they will change it and if they do they might make it worse. SO its up to the users to stubbornly coin something cool for it and ignore microsoft. My vote is for "Zune" or "Xphone"
  20. crazed at 1:22am 8th October 2010 i have never read a more pathetic bunch of old moaners in all my life! it's a phone morons, does the name matter?!
    1. FJC at 2:09am 8th October 2010 ROFLMAO. Couldn't have said it better crazed. iPhone sounds cool, Android sounds geeky, Windows Phone 7 sounds in between IMO. If Microsoft markets it in a 'cool' way, then the name will follow it. e.g. When people found out about the iPad name, it didn't sound as cool as iSlate, yet iPad seems to have come along just fine due to the hype associated with it.
      1. Adam at 5:16am 8th October 2010 You fail. First you agree with crazed, then you start talking about the very thing he was going on about.
  21. Cant_see_why at 12:51am 8th October 2010 It has wasted space across the top too, why? Do Microsoft managers think it's cool to waste space make the thing look lopsided???
  22. Cant_see_why at 12:37am 8th October 2010 The "home" screen is not centered, it has blank wasted space on the left, WTF???
  23. esb at 12:24am 8th October 2010 BTW, that's pronounced: WinFōn It's got the word "win" in it... so it must be good, right? ;)
  24. esb at 12:20am 8th October 2010 WinFon That's what I've been calling it. It's short, sweet & easy to pronounce.
  25. gary at 10:44pm 7th October 2010 Should be called 7Phone, and let it go at that.
  26. Brianna at 8:42pm 7th October 2010 My friends call it "Windows 7 Phone" instead of "Windows Phone 7" and yes they are aware that it's not the desktop OS.
  27. Stocklone at 8:35pm 7th October 2010 Series7 phone actually sounds cool. Rolls right off the tongue. I wish somebody at Microsoft would read these comments. Windows Phone 7 is like I have to concentrate to say it. That's not a good sign. However, I am rooting for it. I think Microsoft has a real winner on its hands. I really think somebody decided we have to stick Windows 7 in the name so people will associate it with Windows 7 which has been a huge success. Great idea in theory. Not so much in practice.
  28. Keith at 7:42pm 7th October 2010 I'm sticking with "Zune Phone". This will be my 5th phone when I get around to getting one. Too bad I just bought a BBerry
  29. Lawrence at 7:28pm 7th October 2010 I never post comments.. but couldnt help on this one.. What about "Series7 phone".. Then they could do "Series8" ETC.. I agree this original name sucks...
  30. Sam at 7:05pm 7th October 2010 Lets call it the "WatPhone" and drop the number
  31. pks at 7:04pm 7th October 2010 What about Xphone as name :) will be in line with another successful product - Xbox
  32. ksingh at 6:43pm 7th October 2010 Don't forget, this is the 3rd name it has had... First it was referred to as Windows Mobile 7 Later it became Windows Phone 7 Series More recently that was changed to Windows Phone 7. What this shows is panic. Microsoft is not confident, and keeps changing the name. Like all Microsoft products, including the first Zune, the first generation of Windows Phone 7 handsets will be pretty bad, missing important functionality like the ability to move text with Cut And Paste. I'd wait for Windows Phone 8.
  33. dave at 12:27pm 7th October 2010 People buy an iPhone (generally Apple is not included in the name). They don't buy a Mac phone or an OSX phone or a Snow Leopard. People buy a droid. Not a google phone So why include Microsoft or Windows in the name? And certainly avoid Vista! (conjures up the concept of a blue screen of death on my phone) If Xbox can be a successful brand consider a BRAND for the phone.
    1. Lawrence at 7:35pm 7th October 2010 What about "Series7".. etc.. No use of windows or microsoft in the name... Just a thought...
  34. Meengla at 12:09pm 7th October 2010 "WinPho" is good enough if someone does not make it into 'Nympho". But, hey, the more the controversy the better for 'marketing'.
  35. Fanboi at 11:32am 7th October 2010 "Windows Phone" seems to be it for the layperson.
  36. Will at 11:15am 7th October 2010 You're right the name does suck. People are probably just call it 'Windows Phone' without the 7. And to think they even had Series at the end lol 'Windows Phone 7 Series'.
Close Suggestion Motorola sues Apple over 18 patents
View Article