Skip to main content

Can sporty hybrids burn rubber without burning too much gas?

Acura-NSX-fl
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Electric vehicles and hyper-miling plug-ins might be media darlings, but conventional hybrids, like Toyota’s ever-popular Prius and Honda’s Insight, are becoming firmly entrenched as the everyday standard of green motoring. The original Prius and Insight may have been impractical toys, but current hybrids have reached a level of refinement and practicality that rivals conventional gasoline and diesel cars.

This improvement, and ever-stricter Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, are leading some companies to plan large-scale hybridization. Toyota, for example, hopes to have 21 hybrid models on sale worldwide by 2015, and to eventually have a hybrid version of every car it makes.

That’s not too much of a problem if you want a midsize sedan or an SUV, but what if you’re looking for something less boring? Hybrids seem to work well as regular cars, but can they replace the performance cars that gearheads hold dear?

2013 Lexus LS 600h L at Golden GatePower

One thing hybrids can do is produce prodigious amounts of horsepower. Some carmakers actually view a hybrid’s electric motor as an energy-boosting addition to the gasoline engine, which has led to the creation of some hybrids that are powerful and frugal, but not especially fast.

Lexus more or less invented this concept with its GS and LS hybrid luxury sedans. Short of the LFA supercar, the LS 600h L is the most expensive car Lexus makes, and it’s the most powerful LS variant.

Like non-hybrid all-wheel drive LS models, the LS 600h L has a 4.6-liter V8, with 360 horsepower and 347 pound-feet of torque. However, it also has a 221 hp electric motor.

It’s the same case with the GS 450h. It has 338 hp, compared to the non-hybrid models’ 306 hp. At $59,450, it’s also about $4,000 more than a loaded GS 350 F Sport with all-wheel drive.

Why make a hybrid the most powerful car in the lineup? It actually has less to do with performance than marketing. While the 450h is the fastest GS to 60 mph (by 0.1 second), the LS 600h L is beaten by the lighter, rear-wheel drive LS 460.

The truth about these cars is in their names. Lexus calls its hybrid LS a “600” because, the brand claims, it offers the power of a 6.0-liter V12 with the fuel economy of a 4.6-liter V8. Similarly, the GS 450h is supposed to replicate that V8’s power, but with a V6’s fuel economy.

So the Lexus hybrids deliver on fuel economy, but without any significant increase in performance, it’s hard to see the point of all that extra power.

A sure sign that the performance hybrid has arrived (or of the apocalypse) is the existence of a hybrid Porsche. In fact, there are two of them: The Panamera S Hybrid and Cayenne S Hybrid. However, with 380 hp, both are pretty close to the bottom of their respective model lines. Porsche is working on a hybrid with more oomph, but more on that later.

If quantity is a bust, what about quality? There are plenty of powerful gasoline cars, but the way they deliver that power can be just as important. It’s (part of) what distinguishes a V8 Ford Shelby GT500 Mustang from a V8 Ferrari 458 Italia.

Enter a very unlikely savior. The Honda CR-Z was supposed to be the second coming of the light and nimble CRX hatchback, but it just isn’t. Japanese tuner Mugen is pointing it in the right direction, though.

By giving the CR-Z’s revvy four-cylinder engine more power, Mugen has made the most of both electricity and gasoline. The electric motor can power the car off the line, at speeds when the gasoline engine doesn’t make much power. The four-banger then takes over at higher speeds.

Honda CR-Z Mugen RZ front three-quarter viewHandling

Hi-def power delivery aside, the CR-Z still shows that carmakers aren’t able to make a hybrid that handles well. Despite its name, the hybrid Honda hasn’t been able to match the fun factor of the Mini Cooper, Fiat 500, or Volkswagen GTI.

Part of the problem is weight. No new car will ever match the 1980s CRX’s 1,802-pound curb weight, but hybrids are always at a disadvantage when compared to regular cars. In addition to engines and transmissions, hybrids have to carry heavy battery packs, electric motors, and their associated control equipment.

Weight negatively affects every aspect of performance, so sporty hybrids may have to wait for advances in lightweight materials before they can really compete for car enthusiasts’ hearts.

Tires are another problem. Subaru and Scion may have fitted Prius-spec Michelin Primacy HPs to the BRZ and FR-S, respectively, but that was to increase low-speed fun. These low-rolling resistance tires have less grip, so it’s easier to slide these affordable sports cars at non-suicidal speeds.

However, to keep this from happening at high speeds, cars need tires with more grip, That means they require more effort to turn, which hurts fuel economy.

Porsche 918 Spyder Prototype SideTech

The hybrid isn’t looking like a very good performance car. So why is Ferrari poise to unveil one, the F150, at the Geneva Motor Show in a few weeks? And why are Porsche and Acura building hybrid supercars of their own?

The short answer is: big money buys more tech. The Ferrari F150, successor to the 2003 Enzo, will have the F12berlinetta’s 6.3-liter V12 and a Formula 1-style Kinetic Energy Recovery System (KERS).

KERS uses a spinning flywheel or a small battery to store energy recovered during braking. This setup is much lighter than a regular hybrid’s battery pack, although it means the F150’s electric-only range will probably be minute.

The F150 will have other unique features, such as a carbon fiber monocoque chassis draped in carbon fiber body panels and up to 950 total horsepower, that should make it one helluva supercar, even if it isn’t a very good green car.

Porsche’s 918 Spyder won’t have KERS, but it will have 780 hp, courtesy of a 4.6-liter V8 and two electric motors. Like the Ferrari, the 918 uses an exotic material (in this case, carbon fiber-reinforced plastic) for its chassis. While technically not a conventional hybrid (drivers can’t plug it in to recharge the battery pack), it can drive on electricity at up to 94 mph, and has already lapped the Nürburgring in 7:14.

A third way to build a performance hybrid is being offered up by Acura. Honda’s luxury division is so confident in its “Sport Hybrid Super Handling All-Wheel Drive” system that it bestowed the legendary NSX name on its new hybrid supercar.

The NSX will primarily be rear-wheel drive, with a mid-mounted V6 providing most of the power. However, electric motors will kick in to power the front wheels when needed. The system will also be used in the RLX sedan, where it will produce more than 370 hp.

Can you really have it all?

Packaging two powertrains in one car, and asking it do everything expected of a normal car while delivering outstanding fuel economy, is a tall order. Making those systems work together harmoniously is also tough, but can potentially be overcome with well written software.

So far, “performance” and “hybrid” seem to be mutually exclusive terms. But with three hybrid supercars about to powerslide onto the scene, that could change.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
The 6 best car phone holders in 2024
Belkin BoostCharge Magnetic Wireless Car Charger with an iPhone 14 Pro.

Belkin BoostCharge Magnetic Wireless Car Charger Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Installing a car phone mount in your vehicle is the best way to make sure that you have easy access to your smartphone when behind the wheel. While you shouldn't be using your phone while driving, having it mounted on your windshield, dashboard, vent, or anywhere else will let you take a quick glance when you're using a navigation app, or to change your playlist when you stop for a traffic light, for example. Instead of having to pick up your device, it will be easier and faster to get these done while it's on a car phone mount for less time of having your eyes off the road.

Read more
Should you buy a used EV? Maybe, but it’s complicated
2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 Limited AWD rear end side profile from driver's side with trees and a metal fence in the back.

Electric cars are slowly but surely getting cheaper. Over the past year or so, Ford and Tesla have been discounting their most popular electric cars while other brands, like Rivian, are laying the groundwork for all-new cheaper models.

But you'd still be hard-pressed to call electric cars cheap, and buying a completely new car in the first place is a hurdle in and of itself for many potential buyers. According to Statista, used car sales represented around 74% of all car sales in 2022, and while this figure is likely to change as electric cars get cheaper, the fact remains that most car buyers would prefer to save cash and buy used rather than buy something new.
Buying a new car ain't what it used to be
Buying a car with an electric powertrain doesn't necessarily need to be all that different from buying an internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle. But there's a little more to it than that.

Read more
Rivian R2 vs. Ford Mustang Mach-E: Will the R2 be a better buy?
Side of the Rivian R2

The Rivian R2 has finally been announced, and it could end up being the go-to EV for drivers who want a decently affordable electric car with a rugged look and feel. But when it finally launches to the public, it won't be the only option in its price range -- the Ford Mustang Mach-E could be one of its main competitors.

The Mustang Mach-E may not be quite as rugged-feeling as the Rivian R2, but it does have a lot going for it -- like an increasingly low price, sleek design, and comfortable interior. Is one of these EVs better than the other? We put the two head-to-head to find out.
Design
The first thing to note about the two cars is their design, as they’re pretty different. The Rivian R2 is built to be a little more rugged and outdoorsy, while the Mach-E instead has a sleeker and sportier look to it. Both cars look stylish and modern.

Read more