As part of a new advertising campaign, Ford’s Lincoln luxury division will henceforth be known as the Lincoln Motor Company. The new campaign seeks to differentiate Lincoln from its parent company’s mainstream models, and to remind potential buyers of the brand’s provenance. Still, with a lineup that is entirely Ford-based, how much can this rebranding accomplish?
The name change is a more significant nod toward independence than one might think. Lincoln was created by Henry M. Leland (founder of Cadillac) in 1920, and survived on its own for two years before it was bought by Ford in 1922. The company’s original name? You guessed it: Lincoln Motor Company.
“This is about moving forward by looking back,” the narrator of Lincoln’s new commercial says, and the brand has plenty to look back on. One spot juxtaposes the 2013 MKZ with classic Lincolns, including 1940, 1956, and 1961 Continentals. There’s also a cameo by President Abraham Lincoln (talk about impressive history).
“The campaign captures the founding principles of the company and brings them forward to a new generation of progressive luxury buyers,” Lincoln’s press release said. Indeed, another ad shows classic Lincolns interspersed with shots of designers working on a clay model MKZ, and some skydiving, something Honest Abe probably wouldn’t have partaken in.
Lincoln definitely needs to prove that it is a legitimate luxury brand, and not a Ford trim level, but its ad department might writing checks its engineers can’t cash. The new MKZ is a good car but, like every other current Lincoln, it’s a restyled Ford model (in this case, the Fusion) with some posh options.
Lincolns also use the same engines and transmissions as the Ford models they’re based on, and come with the same infotainment system (rebranded MyLincoln Touch).
This might take some of the brand’s luster away, but it doesn’t necessarily have to be a problem for sales. Lexus’ two bestsellers are the ES sedan and RX crossover, which are based on the Toyota Camry and Highlander, respectively.
However, Lincoln is being squeezed from both directions. Its cars cost nearly as much as the competition from BMW and Mercedes-Benz, which offer a more premium experience. At the same time, certain Ford models offer similar levels of equipment to their Lincoln counterparts.
Lincoln also lacks a brand-specific model, like the Lexus IS, GS, or LS, to lure buyers away from its parent’s showrooms. Rumors are going around about a rear-wheel drive Lincoln based on the 2015 Mustang, but so far they are just rumors.
Through November 2012, Lincoln sold a total of 74,766 cars. Lexus sold 213,559 cars, and BMW sold 303,728. Maybe Abe Lincoln should get a speaking part in Lincoln Motor Company’s next ad.
The are no different than Acura, Lexus or Infiniti which are all rebranded versions of the lower-end cars.
Are there any lincoln models which are not Ford-based?
Not at the moment, and that’s the problem. Acura, Infiniti, and Lexus all have models that aren’t shared with their parent brands, and that makes a big difference. Acura has the TL, RL, and RDX (the TSX is also a unique model in the U.S., since it’s based on the European-spec Accord), Infiniti has the G, M, EX, and FX, and Lexus has its rear-drive sedans.
The Navigator, MKS, MKT, MKX, and MKZ are based on the Expedition, Taurus, Flex, Edge, and Fusion, respectively.
I think the Infiniti QX56 is based on the European Nissan Transport right?
It’s actually based on the Patrol, which is like Nissan’s equivalent to the Toyota Land Cruiser, and of course the first-gen version was based on the Armada.
Oops you are right. I meant Patrol. Good catch!
mmmmmmm… “Acura, Infiniti, and Lexus all have models that aren’t shared with their parent brands, and that makes a big difference.” Unless you go to Japan, and you will see all of the Acura, Infiniti, and Lexus US models branded under their Honda, Nissan, and Toyota parents. Last time I was there, I saw a Honda TL, but it was called an Accord. Same can be said about all the other brands…
True, but the TL is still a big upgrade from the Accord, whether it wears a Honda or Acura badge, and the Infiniti G and Lexus GS have nothing in common with Altimas and Camrys. It’s just that Japanese buyers expect their domestic brands to produce both mainstream and luxury cars under the same brand. Regardless of which badge they carry in which country, those models were still designed from the ground up as luxury cars, which is completely different from the rebadged Fords that comprise Lincoln’s entire lineup.
Infiniti G used to be (not sure about anymore) a rebranded Nissan Skyline sedan for export. It’s also the same platform (FM) as the 350/370z. To the point where older G37s looked very similar to the old 350′s. Not too sure about the Lexus, as I am not really a toyota fan.
Correct, but like the TL, the G was designed to be what it is and then branded as either a Skyline or Infiniti depending on the market. Either way, it’s really different from an Altima. Rumor has it that Lincoln might be trying a similar thing, with a rear-drive sedan based on the next-gen Mustang.
Oh I would love that! I really do like what Ford has been doing these past few years. They are at least 5 years ahead of other US manufacturers.
I am a ford guy through and through. I have always loved the Lincoln lineup. Well, since the mid 2000′s anyway! They (Ford) have been getting much better in quality, and have been leaps and bounds ahead of any other US auto company. I am seriously considering getting a ford/lincoln for my wife’s next ride.
Jesterking, Other luxury car have their place, but for me Lincoln will be the one I name as best. A Lincoln Town Car saw me through a Texas Flash Flood without a drop of water inside, while many other cars were belly up. My 1996 Lincoln Town Car has seen me through 140,000 miles without a hitch in its engine, transmission, and drive train – never opened even once. That’s quality! If I ever by another car, you can bet it will be a Lincoln!