Skip to main content

Stress out your system with new 3DMark tests for identifying faulty hardware

3dmark stress tests
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Want to check the reliability and stability of your freshly built or store-bought desktop? Want to see if that new graphics card will wreak havoc on your system? You can now find out quickly and easily by using the new dedicated stress test feature in Futuremark’s 3DMark benchmarking software. Thanks to this added solution, desktop owners now have an easy way to determine if better cooling is needed, to zero in on a faulty component, or to expose problems that cause instability and an overall unreliable system.

The company said on Monday that more than two-thirds of its 3DMark users check the stability of their overclocks with the software, while more than half use 3DMark to test a system’s cooling performance. Thus, the company decided to make the processes easier by including four levels of stress testing based on benchmarks that are already included in the software: Fire Strike Ultra, Fire Strike Extreme, Fire Strike, and Sky Driver.

“The best time to run a 3DMark Stress Test is after buying or building a new PC, upgrading your graphics card, or overclocking your GPU,” the company said on Monday. “If your GPU crashes or produces visual artifacts during the test, it may indicate a reliability or stability problem. If it overheats and shuts down, you may need more cooling in your computer.”

According to Futuremark, the stress tests run in a loop without pausing for anything. For owners of the Advanced Edition, the stress test will execute 20 loops that take around 10 minutes overall, while the Professional Edition allows for any number of loops ranging from two to 5,000. Once the test is done, customers will see the system’s Frame Rate Stability score, which must be at least 97 percent for all loops for the system in question to pass the test. That said, the stress tests are only offered in the Advance Edition and Professional Edition of 3DMark.

Futuremark 3DMark Stress Test
Image used with permission by copyright holder

In a provided example shown above, Futuremark used the Fire Strike stress test found in the Advanced Edition and revealed a new “Stress Tests” category squeezed in between the “Benchmarks” and “VRMark” tools. The tested system in the demo had a score of 87.3-percent, a failing grade, because the performance was throttled down when the system got hot due to the load.  The test went through 20 loops and showed the GPU dropping from 59 frames per second to 51 frames per second during the process.

If you’re wanting to stress out your system to see how it performs under the load and possibly weed out any problems, the 3DMark Advanced Edition costs a mere $25 on Futuremark’s website and Steam. Customers can also test multi-GPU setups using the built-in Fire Strike Extreme benchmark, or test 4K Ultra HD output using the software’s Fire Strike Ultra benchmark. Users can even compare DirectX 12 results against DirectX 11 and AMD’s Mantle API.

To run this software, customers need at least a dual-core Intel or AMD processor clocked at 1.8GHz, 2GB of system memory, 3GB of hard drive space, a DirectX 9 compatible graphics chip, and Windows Vista. Futuremark recommends using Windows 10, 4GB of system memory, and a graphics chip with 1GB of dedicated memory that supports DirectX 11.

As for the Professional Edition, a single-seat license starts at $995, meaning customers can install the software on one system at a time. Multiple simultaneous installs require multiple licenses or a single Site License. Contact Futuremark here to get a quote.

Editors' Recommendations

Kevin Parrish
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kevin started taking PCs apart in the 90s when Quake was on the way and his PC lacked the required components. Since then…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more