Skip to main content

67 percent of Facebook users were spammed in 2010

facebook-logo-broken-window-bad-security-malware-spam-phishing
Image used with permission by copyright holder

There was once a time when spam emails were our biggest worry. No longer, says Sophos. In its annual Security Threat Report, the IT security firm found that 67 percent of those using social sites like Facebook and Twitter have been spammed at least once in 2010. Worse,  40 percent of social users were sent malware in 2010, nearly double what it was in the summer of 2009.

Phishing attacks were up as well, with more than 43 percent of users having been sent false emails or communications as hackers attempt to steal login info. Sophos polled 1,200 users of social networks to find the data. 82 percent of respondents marked that Facebook-born threats were the biggest security issue at this time.

“The amount of cyber attacks on social networks has dramatically risen in the last two years,” said Graham Clulley, senior technology consultant at Sophos. “Spammers have turned to social networks as their security walls are no where near as good as email services. Plus cyber criminals experience greater deals of success on social networks because people trust spam more when it comes from a ‘friend’ and end up following links and spending more money than they do when emailed spam.”

In Nov. 2010, Digital Society studied many top Websites and found that both Facebook and Twitter failed basic security tests, like using SSL. About one year ago, the social network partnered with McAfee to try and improve its security features.

Have you experienced spam, malware, or a phishing attack on Facebook in the last year? Does Facebook have a worse problem than other services, like Twitter, or should the blame be spread around?

Topics
Jeffrey Van Camp
Former Digital Trends Contributor
As DT's Deputy Editor, Jeff helps oversee editorial operations at Digital Trends. Previously, he ran the site's…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more