Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing

Adobe resurrects Flash tool after Apple about-face

Fahmida Y. Rashid
By

Flash CS5 boxIn response to Apple’s dramatic about-face yesterday on what tools programmers can use to develop iPhone apps, Adobe said it would resurrect its Flash-to-iPhone tool. Reversing its previously unpopular stance, Apple will no longer restrict  programmers to a handful of languages when developing software for the iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch.

“This is great news for developers,” Adobe said.

Recommended Videos

A feature in the Flash Professional CS5 authoring tool, Packager for iPhone lets programmers port Flash applications so that they can run on any iOS device. Adobe put  Packager on hold in April after Apple revised the developer program license agreement to name Objective C, C, C++, and JavaScript as the only permitted development languages. This effectively barred programmers from using cross-platform compilers, requiring them to rewrite existing applications from scratch to run on an Apple device. With cross-platform compilers, developers can write the application once – in Flash, for example, or JavaScript, – and then recompile for each new platform.

Related

Adobe originally created Packager as part of its Flash authoring package as a workaround, because Apple doesn’t allow interpreters on the iOS platform.

The change was widely viewed as a direct attack on Adobe at the time. It didn’t help matters when some apps appeared on the App Store that were built using compilers from other companies. According to Adobe, applications built using Flash Packager were getting approved for the App Store on Thursday after Apple’s announcement.

Apple’s relaxing of developer rules may have been forced by the looming specter of anti-trust inquiries by FTC and Department of Justice. Adobe may have initiated the action.

The changes in developer rules also mean collecting user data from in-app advertising services such as Google’s AdMob is allowed again. However, this reversal has no effect on Apple’s ongoing refusal to run Flash applications directly on the iPhone. That war of words seems likely to continue.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Fahmida Y. Rashid
Fahmida Y. Rashid
Former Digital Trends Contributor
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more