Skip to main content

AMD confusingly reveals minimum CPU specs for Oculus Rift

amd expands wraiths chilly influence over fx lineup amdwraithcooler
AMD
Update: Forbes writer Jason Evangelho reached out to to me on Twitter, pointing out that Forbes made no mistake on its initial reporting and that, instead, AMD had backpedaled on its original claims.

After Nvidia warned last month that only 13 million of the 1.3 billion+ PCs in the world would be capable of rendering VR, its primary competitor AMD has lifted the veil on its own set of recommendations on the technology. This time, however, we’re getting the minimum specs for a VR-ready CPU rather than for graphics cards.

AMD’s clarification is important for its fans, and for anyone considering its processors. Oculus’ official specifications, as well as its system requirement tool, currently exclude AMD processors. That’s because the Rift’s recommended specifications ask for a Core i5-4590, with no mention of the AMD equivalent.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

This news stems from Jason Evangelho of Forbes who reported that, despite Oculus’ own hardware tester suggesting otherwise, both the FX and APU processor families are supported by headsets like the Rift.

Unfortunately, in a revision to the original post, Forbes admitted that AMD had backpedaled on its initial assertions and that only FX chips are guaranteed to be compatible with the Oculus Rift, and presumably HTC Vive as well, while the APU chips are still being validated. That doesn’t mean the APU chips aren’t capable of running VR, just that there may be a few hiccups along the process.

As ExtremeTech points out, even the forthcoming A10-7890K chip from AMD can’t compete in terms of sheer horsepower to some of Intel’s Core processors. Because AMD’s CPU catalog doesn’t quite reach the performance parity with Intel’s chips, AMD tends to put its multi-core hardware up against Intel processors donning a lower core count.

For that reason, if you plan on pairing your VR headset of choice with an Intel CPU, it’ll only need to be the Core i5-4590, a 3.3GHz quad-core combined with a 3.7GHz Turbo clock, 6MB of L2 cache, with no Hyper-Threading included.

If you’re going with AMD, any eight or six-core CPU with a base clock of at least 3.9GHz should be powerful enough to get you started. For the time being, though, AMD is only certain about FX-branded CPUs. Hopefully we’ll see the APU chip validation turn out positively so that more people can appreciate Virtual Reality as the Oculus Rift release date swiftly approaches.

Editors' Recommendations

Gabe Carey
Former Digital Trends Contributor
A freelancer for Digital Trends, Gabe Carey has been covering the intersection of video games and technology since he was 16…
What’s behind customers returning their Vision Pro headsets?
A man wears an Apple Vision Pro headset.

Vision Pro returns are seeing a sudden uptick, according to multiple news reports citing activity on social media.

Apple started shipping the Vision Pro headset to great fanfare on February 2, with the tech giant reportedly hoping to sell as many as half a million headsets before the end of this year.

Read more
Vision Pro App Store reaches early milestone, Apple reveals
A person tilts their head while wearing the Apple Vision Pro.

One of the drawbacks of Apple’s new Vision Pro headset is the small number of available apps. Sure, you can load most iPad apps onto the mixed-reality headset, but it’s the tailor-made apps that really bring out the best in the Vision Pro.

The good news is that the Vision Pro App Store now has 1,000 visionOS apps ready for download by owners of the face-based computer, which started shipping for $3,499 on February 2.

Read more
AMD’s new CPU slammed as ‘anti-consumer at best’
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 propped up against an action figure.

AMD makes some of the best processors, but this one is most likely not one of them. According to a video review of the recently released Ryzen 7 5700, the CPU is not only a letdown -- it's downright misleading. Compared to previous non-X Ryzen processors, the 5700 appears to be significantly cutdown, which affects its performance in a big way.

Historically, AMD's non-X Ryzen CPUs were pretty much the same as their X counterparts, but with slightly lower clock speeds. Take the Ryzen 5 5600 and the Ryzen 5 5600X, for example. Both chips have six cores and 12 threads, as well as 32MB of cache, but the Ryzen 5 5600 has a clock speed of 4.4GHz, while the 5600X hits 4.6GHz. As a result, many chose the non-X part due to it being slightly cheaper while not being a major downgrade.

Read more