Skip to main content

AMD’s new CEO cuts 1,400 jobs

AMD CEO Rory Read
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Back when former Lenovo exec Rory Read took over the president and CEO position at AMD last August, industry watchers were wondering what his first moves would be to shore up the company’s finances and head towards profitability. Now Read is making his first move, announcing the company plans to cut 1,400 jobs as part of a cost-cutting restructuring. The positions represent about 12 percent of AMD’s total workforce.

“Reducing our cost structure and focusing our global workforce on key growth opportunities will strengthen AMD’s competitiveness and allow us to aggressively pursue a balanced set of strategic activities designed to accelerate future growth,” said Read, in a statement.

AMD is the world’s second-largest maker of PC microprocessors—albeit far behind industry titan Intel, which commands roughly 80 percent of the market. AMD’s recent quarters have been hurt by manufacturing delays as well as overall weakness in the computer market: although consumers and businesses are embracing mobile and tablet devices, that enthusiasm has increasing come at the expense of traditional notebook, desktop, and server systems—the PC market is still expanding, just at a much slower pace than in previous years. And, like Intel, AMD has yet to make a real dent in the market for mobile processors, which so far is almost completely dominated by chips based on ARM designs.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

The job cuts follow on previous layoffs in 2008 and 2009 that saw the company part ways with more than 3,000 employees.

AMD expects the new round of job cuts will be spread across “all functions globally” and by complete by the end of the first quarter of 2012. AMD says it expects the cuts will save it about $200 million in 2012 alone, although the restructuring will also cost it about $105 million in 2011 and 2012 due to employee severance and termination of contractual commitments.

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
AMD finally has a strategy to beat Nvidia’s DLSS
Frank Azor presenting at AMD's RDNA 3 launch event.

AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution 3 (FSR 3) has had an uphill climb so far, but things might get better in 2024. According to a statement from the company's chief technology officer, this year will be a big one for AMD in terms of AI -- and this doesn't just mean large-scale AI, but also upscaling. Are we going to see some major changes in AMD's next-gen RDNA 4 graphics cards?

The tantalizing bit of information comes from Mark Papermaster, AMD CTO, who was a guest on the No Priors Podcast. At the very end of the interview, Papermaster gave a few hints as to what's on AMD's agenda for 2024. It's all about AI, and no surprise -- Nvidia has adopted the same approach.

Read more
I tested the RTX 4070 against AMD’s new RX 7900 GRE — and it’s not pretty
Two RTX 4070 graphics cards sitting side by side.

AMD just released the best RDNA 3 graphics card we've seen yet in the form of the RX 7900 GRE. The GPU, originally released in China several months ago, sets its sights squarely on Nvidia's RTX 4070 -- and AMD comes out on top most of the time.

I've tested both GPUs extensively -- read my RTX 4070 review and RX 7900 GRE review for a full breakdown -- and I'm here to compare them point-for-point. AMD comes out on top for raw performance, but there are a couple of key details to keep in mind before making your final buying decision.
Pricing and availability

Read more
AMD’s new CPU slammed as ‘anti-consumer at best’
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 propped up against an action figure.

AMD makes some of the best processors, but this one is most likely not one of them. According to a video review of the recently released Ryzen 7 5700, the CPU is not only a letdown -- it's downright misleading. Compared to previous non-X Ryzen processors, the 5700 appears to be significantly cutdown, which affects its performance in a big way.

Historically, AMD's non-X Ryzen CPUs were pretty much the same as their X counterparts, but with slightly lower clock speeds. Take the Ryzen 5 5600 and the Ryzen 5 5600X, for example. Both chips have six cores and 12 threads, as well as 32MB of cache, but the Ryzen 5 5600 has a clock speed of 4.4GHz, while the 5600X hits 4.6GHz. As a result, many chose the non-X part due to it being slightly cheaper while not being a major downgrade.

Read more