Anonymous-PROTECT-IP-US-Chamber-of-Commerce-DDoS

In protest of the "PROTECT IP" bill, hacker group Anonymous plans to attack the US Chamber of Commerce website Monday evening.

Hacktivist group Anonymous plans to launch attack the US Chamber of Commerce website today at 8pm EST, according to a flier posted to 4chan.org and Reddit.com, which urges Internet users to join in the fight. The distributed denial of service (DDoS) campaign is an act of protest against a piece of supposed anti-piracy legislation proposed by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) known as the “Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property” bill, or “PROTECT IP.”

Anonymous, known for its campaigns against both corporations and governments around the world who the group believes stifle the free flow of information, argues that, if passed, PROTECT IP “would allow the US Government to force [Internet service providers] and search engines to censor websites they do not like under the guise of ‘copyright protection.’”

The online protest was first announced Sunday in a statement released by the group, which reads:

“As pioneers of this new world, it’s our duty to resist and fight those who attempt to stop us. Whether you’re a journalist or blogger, or a participant of Anonymous, or the activists on the ground who protest against these corporate thugs and oppressive regimes and risk everything for freedom of information and speech, we are all in this battle together and we have a responsibility to protect our civil liberties.

“This attack tomorrow will send yet another message to the pigs that run the state that we will not be another cog in the f****d up clock that these corporate entities attempt to preserve through their political puppets in Washington.

“This is our world now and we will fight for it. Take it or leave it.”

The PROTECT IP bill, a reiteration of the failed COICA bill, would give the US Justice Department broad powers to shut down access to websites it deems “dedicated to infringing activities.” As Anonymous accurately describes, these powers include forcing ISPs to block access to targeted websites, and even requiring search engines, like Google and Bing, to completely remove the websites from their search indexes.

Perhaps even more troubling, the bill would also give private citizens — i.e. copyright holders — the ability to request that the government block a websites’ ability to display advertising, or process payments.

Anonymous says that, rather than reduce piracy, the bill simply “endangers the free flow of information,” through the use of “domain seizures, ISP blockades, search engine censorship, and the restriction of funding to accused websites,” says Anonymous. All of this, they say, “takes Internet censorship to the next level.”

The hacker’s interpretation of the bill, a summary of which leaked online last week, is echoed by a variety of other privacy advocates, who say the legislation is woefully misguided, and will result in rampant government censorship.

“Protecting copyright and trademark are of course important objectives,” writes author and technology expert Larry Downes in an analysis of the bill posted to CNet. “But doing so by trampling due process rights, tinkering dangerously with the mechanics of the Internet, and impressing into police duties an expanding set of Internet service providers, hardly seems the best solution.”

Anonymous first came into the world spotlight after launching a series of similar attacks on the corporate websites of PayPal, Master Card and Visa, all of which stopped processing donation payments made to whistle blowing website WikiLeaks. Most recently, members of the group were accused by Sony of initiating (or, at least, facilitating) an attack on its PlayStation Network, which resulted in the theft of nearly 13 million user credit cards, and could cost the company upwards of $170 million in damages.

Those who wish to join in the DDoS attack — which simply overloads a website’s servers with an overwhelming amount of traffic, causing it to go offline — can join other Anons in the #OperationPayback IRC channel, where countless supporters have gathered to coordinate the attack.

To read a full summary of PROTECT IP, click here.

Showing 24 comments

  1. Mark Dobrowski at 10:37am 3rd August 2011 I would like to make a simile about this issue. If I don't lock my door to my car and someone steals it, I look like a fool. These companies who leave very sensitive data unprotected and it gets out, are in my word, monkeys. Not a good thing. They are morons! Put some protection on your data or lose it!
  2. Stephen LeatherFace Popa at 11:37pm 23rd May 2011 great article. it really helped me understand what is going on, u always here about all this stuff but this article was so well written it gave me a new understanding on what these mean hackers are doing..
  3. Stephen LeatherFace Popa at 11:32pm 23rd May 2011 we are legion :-)
  4. Cow Layfo at 10:40pm 23rd May 2011 I HATE to quote a movie, but a government should indeed fear it's people. I hope this shakes things up.
  5. Damon Schmitt at 8:28pm 23rd May 2011 "This is what they are doing", is a far cry from "you should do this too". Honestly though, regardless of how you feel about the methods, there is 1 thing perfectly clear in this: this legislation is oppressive, and you should do anything in your power, within what you feel is right, to oppose its implementation.
  6. Jacob Troyer at 7:24pm 23rd May 2011 Comrades, let us join in the revolution!
  7. Adam Hughes at 7:01pm 23rd May 2011 I don't see you complaining about there link to the bill itself, those dirty government pawns DT! (wink).Hot topic! I love these spirited discussions
  8. Adam Hughes at 6:57pm 23rd May 2011 @NimaExactly.@ mathewJust because u say my words don't have merit doesn't mean they don't. You just don't like dissenting opinions, which is obvious from your posts. Sure I don't know you, but I know a little about you based on your posts within this thread. Perhaps you should preface things differently if you don't want people to draw seemingly obvious conclusions about your beliefs.
  9. Nima Soleimany at 6:26pm 23rd May 2011 dude grow a pair of balls if you don't like the information being given to you, just unlike them hahaha you're a horrible troll
  10. Matthew Speer at 5:49pm 23rd May 2011 Shame on all of us for taking a literal reference....literally. How low brow.
  11. Nima Soleimany at 5:48pm 23rd May 2011 Lol look at you guys arguing like smart men you are. Way to take the article way too literal.
  12. Matthew Speer at 5:45pm 23rd May 2011 Adam. Your comments are generalized and have no merit. You have no idea what I'm used to. So I will refrain from doing what you just did and ignore your comment. Thanks.
  13. Matthew Speer at 5:44pm 23rd May 2011 I agree with you....I was just surprised.
  14. Digital Trends at 5:43pm 23rd May 2011 Perhaps we should have used a little more discretion (I agree), but it would be worse to edit or remove the story now.
  15. Matthew Speer at 5:38pm 23rd May 2011 Quote: Those who wish to join in the DDoS attack — which simply (It isn't simple to the site receiving the attack) overloads a website’s servers with an overwhelming amount of traffic, causing it to go offline — can join other Anons in the #OperationPayback IRC channel, where countless supporters have gathered to coordinate the attack.
  16. Matthew Speer at 5:37pm 23rd May 2011 Correction: Link to their IRC channel. Also the way you put it, it is just a traffic based attack, no harm done. You are downplaying the severity of such an attack.
  17. Adam Hughes at 5:37pm 23rd May 2011 @ mathewYour just not used to newspeople and organizations reporting both sides of the story. Frankly most would be too afraid for a number of reasons concerning this particular story, so i appreciate DT reporting what they did.
  18. Matthew Speer at 5:34pm 23rd May 2011 If you want to be supporters, that is fine with me. It's a free country, just don't deny it when it is obvious. Ask yourself this, "If nobody knew how to assist with this attack....would your post help them aid Anonymous with their cause?" The answer is obvious......
  19. Matthew Speer at 5:32pm 23rd May 2011 Read your post. There is an image on what to do. Along with a link to their page. That is exactly what you did.
  20. Digital Trends at 5:30pm 23rd May 2011 Not at all Matthew. Just informing readers on how it was done. And we did not provide step-by-step instructions...
  21. Matthew Speer at 5:23pm 23rd May 2011 Weird that DT would show step by step instructions on how to perform these attacks. Thats not the news, that is support. So I take it DT is now supporters of Anonymous? Strange.
  22. Bernd Currie at 5:13pm 23rd May 2011 gO gET EM HA HA
  23. Michael Little Bear Neely at 5:08pm 23rd May 2011 ....lol
  24. Daniel Pizarro at 5:05pm 23rd May 2011 wtf?
Close Suggestion Lady Gaga stars in new Google Chrome commercial
View Article