<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple and Psystar Go to Mediation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/apple-and-psystar-go-to-mediation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/apple-and-psystar-go-to-mediation/</link>
	<description>Upgrade Your Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:30:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: T.J.</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/apple-and-psystar-go-to-mediation/#comment-57513</link>
		<dc:creator>T.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-57513</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m betting that Apple will simply offer them a small settlement of hush money, and quietly buy out their customer list.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if Apple wins in court, they lose even more with a developer community that is still threatening to leave them for Android due to Apple&#039;s heavy handed treatment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But why is this such a pickle to the average person?  Because Apple produces closed computer devices.  Apple generates huge markup by overpricing their hardware.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have nothing against Apple doing their thing.  If someone wants to pay their prices that&#039;s just fine, but in the &quot;free market&quot; that we are supposed to have, Apple&#039;s license agreements should not forbid competition.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have no doubt that if Microsoft made a computer, and required that it was the only computer allowed to run Windows - that they would be accused of a hardware monopoly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The days of a single hardware/software vendor are long past. Everyone wants interoperability, rather than one size fits all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m betting that Apple will simply offer them a small settlement of hush money, and quietly buy out their customer list.  </p>
<p>Even if Apple wins in court, they lose even more with a developer community that is still threatening to leave them for Android due to Apple&#039;s heavy handed treatment.</p>
<p>But why is this such a pickle to the average person?  Because Apple produces closed computer devices.  Apple generates huge markup by overpricing their hardware.  </p>
<p>I have nothing against Apple doing their thing.  If someone wants to pay their prices that&#039;s just fine, but in the &#8220;free market&#8221; that we are supposed to have, Apple&#039;s license agreements should not forbid competition.  </p>
<p>I have no doubt that if Microsoft made a computer, and required that it was the only computer allowed to run Windows &#8211; that they would be accused of a hardware monopoly.</p>
<p>
The days of a single hardware/software vendor are long past. Everyone wants interoperability, rather than one size fits all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daveyboy</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/apple-and-psystar-go-to-mediation/#comment-57514</link>
		<dc:creator>Daveyboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-57514</guid>
		<description>I hope Apple wins this case. As a mac user we pay premium prices for software and hardware that is held to a higher level of quality and craftsmanship.True apple users will always pay this price.Why drive a Ford(PC), when you can drive a Benz(Mac). Having other companies stamp a OSX logo on garbage that may screw up my Benz would make me mad. Just because it has a OSX logo doesnt mean it has been tried and true by Apple programmers to work flawlessly on our Macs.GOOOOOO Apple!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Apple wins this case. As a mac user we pay premium prices for software and hardware that is held to a higher level of quality and craftsmanship.True apple users will always pay this price.Why drive a Ford(PC), when you can drive a Benz(Mac). Having other companies stamp a OSX logo on garbage that may screw up my Benz would make me mad. Just because it has a OSX logo doesnt mean it has been tried and true by Apple programmers to work flawlessly on our Macs.GOOOOOO Apple!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
