Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Asus’ upcoming Chromebook Flip now available for pre-order at $249

Add as a preferred source on Google

Update 6/16/2015 1:30PM: The Asus Chromebook Flip is now available for pre-order at a few online retailers, like CDW. It’s $249 for a model with 2GB of RAM, or $279 for 4GB of RAM.

Google announced the development of the Asus Chromebook Flip on March 31, which has a 360-degree hinge to provide both a tablet and laptop experience. The company says that it will ship in six to eight weeks, and it will retail for $249, according to PC World.

Recommended Videos

In addition to having the ability to flip the display for tablet use, the product has a touchscreen and a 10.1-inch IPS display. The Chromebook Flip weighs less than two pounds, and it’s completely composed of metal. This makes it a durable, portable computer for consumers who are always on the go.

A Rockchip 3288 processor will power the Chromebook Flip, and it will have 2GB of RAM and 16GB of eMMC flash memory. With its processors, Rockchip has been enabling Google to create more powerful Chromebooks without breaking the bank.

This is one of several Chrome OS devices that will be shipping out in the coming months with a Rockchip 3288 processor. Google recently announced the development of the Chromebit, which is being described as a “computer-on-a-stick.” There’s also a number of new Chromebooks based on the chip from Asus, CTL, Haier and others.

A high-end version of the Chromebook Flip will also be released, which upgrades to 4GB of RAM and 16GB of SSD. On a single charge, the device will be able to operate for up to 10 hours on battery power. It has 802.11ac Wi-Fi, as well as 4.0 Bluetooth.

Asus’ Chromebook Flip is not a particularly unusual system from a hardware standpoint, but its design is certainly odd for a Chromebook. Our past experience with Chrome OS systems that have a touchscreen has been enjoyable, though, so it’s possible the Flip could be an extremely competent convertible.

Krystle Vermes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Krystle Vermes is a professional writer, blogger and podcaster with a background in both online and print journalism. Her…
The face on an AI interviewer may matter as much as the decision it makes
Researchers found that race and gender matching changed how fairly rejected applicants viewed an automated interview, even though everyone received the same outcome
File, Computer Hardware, Electronics

An AI hiring system can treat every applicant the same and still leave some people feeling targeted. Researchers found that rejected candidates judged an automated interview differently depending on the race and gender of the avatar delivering the result.

Around 220 participants completed a simulated interview for a fictional customer support role with one of four photorealistic AI avatars. Everyone was rejected, yet perceptions of fairness shifted with the interviewer’s appearance. An algorithm audit could miss that reaction because candidates don’t experience the system as raw code. They experience a face asking questions and judging their answers.

Read more
YouTube’s AI-powered search is rolling out in the US to find videos based on situations you describe
Ask YouTube can find videos based on the situation or idea you describe
youtube ai search feature

YouTube users in the U.S. are getting a new way to search for videos on the web. The company has started rolling out Ask YouTube, its conversational AI search experience, beyond the Premium-only test announced at Google I/O 2026.

Instead of entering a few keywords and scrolling through a standard list of results, users can ask YouTube a complete question. The feature is designed for broader searches where the exact video, channel, or topic may not already be clear.

Read more
Meta’s detection tool fails to identify photos generated by its own Muse Image AI
Meta has created an invisible watermarking tool called Content Seal that is embedded in all images generated by the Muse Image AI.
Meta AI identification tool.

Earlier this week, Meta announced two new AI products, namely, Muse Image and Muse Video. As the name suggests, these are generative AI tools for making photos and video clips using natural language text prompts. Soon after their rollout commenced, these tools sparked controversy because Meta had automatically opted in Instagram users, allowing others to use their publicly posted media and convert them into remixed AI content. But it appears that Meta courted another loss on its side of the court.

What's the problem?

Read more