Asus, Toshiba Notebooks Top SquareTrade’s Reliability Figures

HP Mini 5101

Extended warranty provider SquareTrade says Asus and Toshiba notebooks are the most reliable it sees...and Acer, Gateway, and HP notebooks are among the least reliable.

Independent warranty provider SquareTrade has released a study of more than 30,000 notebooks tracked through its extended warranty plans—and the results are a little surprising. Computer makers Asus and Toshiba led the pack in terms of notebook system reliability, with fewer than 10 percent of their systems needing repair after two years, with three-year failure rate projections of about 15.6 and 15.7 percent (respectively). And who’s in last place? Top computer maker Hewlett-Packard, with more than 15 percent of its systems failing after two years, and a three-year projection forecasting over a quarter of them will fail in three years.

“While our study found netbook malfunction rates to be trending 20 percent higher than more expensive laptops, the variance between manufacturer is far greater and should be a bigger factor in making a buying decision,” SquareTrade wrote in its report. “Asus and Toshiba laptops failed just over half as frequently as HP, which makes them a solid bet in terms of reliability.”

Overall, SquareTrade reports that 31 percent of all notebook owners reported a failure to SquareTrade; about two thirds of those failure were hardware malfunctions, while the remaining third of the failures were reported as accidental damage.

Unsurprisingly, Squaretrade finds inexpensive netbooks have higher failure rates than more mainstream notebook computers—and premium notebook systems have lower failure rates still. After a year, some 5.8 percent of netbooks had a malfunction, compared to 4.7 percent of mainstream notebooks and 4.2 percent of premium notebooks—that makes the failure rate for netbooks more than 20 percent higher than entry-level mainstream notebooks and 40 percent higher than premium notebooks. However, SquareTrade does note that netbooks haven’t been on the market very long, so the repair and problem data is still inconclusive.

SquareTrade is in the business of offering independent warranties to consumers. To produce this data, SquareTrade tracked failure rates for over 30,000 new notebook computers covered by SquareTrade warranty plans. Although that sample set is self-selecting—there’s no way of knowing how representative SquareTrade customers are of everyday computer users—the data does suggest significant variations in reliability among computer manufacturers…or significant variations among the way SquareTrade customers select and use different manufacturers’ products.

And industry darling Apple? SquareTrade ranked them number four behind Asus, Toshiba, and Sony, with a two-year failure rate a little over 10 percent and a projected three-year failure rate of 17.4 percent. Above average…barely.

Showing 10 comments

  1. Jack at 11:17am 15th January 2010 Quanta and Compal are actually the largest laptop makers, not HP and Gateway. Asus rounds out the top 5.
    http://www.physorg.com/news98005202.html
  2. alex at 8:19am 2nd December 2009 Your MAC do not have a MAC hard drive, the hard drive is a regular seagate, maxtor, wd hard drive (the same you will see in windows), so the fact that your lap is an APPLE don't mean anything. Perhaps you have an Solid hd.
  3. filber28 at 5:55am 21st November 2009 Anyone else here thing it's pretty convenient that the 2nd largest laptop maker in the world came out 2nd last and the world's largest laptop maker came in last?? I wonder if the reporting source (a warranty company) might have something to gain from this. LOL This is no coincidence believe me.
  4. Conundrum at 12:41pm 20th November 2009 Buy business class products. If you by retail garbage you get what you pay for. Squaretrade doesn't handle business class stuff as a rule. Comparing an HP dv9000 to an HP/Compaq nc6220 is like night and day. The home user ones just don't compare. They are cheap and alot of small businesses buy them until they learn why they shouldn't.
  5. Scott at 11:41am 20th November 2009 Well my company has ordered for my office approximately 40 HP 2510p small form laptops...failure rate for bad motherboards 82.5% (33 out of 40).
  6. Ian Bell at 11:20am 20th November 2009 My guess is that a lot of the failures are due to poor circulation and heat issues. We have some notebooks here at DT (I work for Digital Trends) that we have had on long-term loan, and when they do fail, it's almost always because a fan went out, or something overheated.
  7. Ian Bell at 11:19am 20th November 2009 I always have to wonder how accurate these reports are. I have a MacBook Air with a regular non-SSD hard drive in it, and I throw that thing around like crazy. It works great and I have not had any problems with it.
  8. Anonymusing at 11:03am 20th November 2009 Odd that this is the exact reverse of last year's SquareTrade report, when HP came out on top.

    http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Squaret...
    1. Adult at 5:59am 7th February 2011 Yeah, and in 12 months "many" companys change part suppliers, cut back on QC and cut corners as needed all in an effort to increase PROFITS! So, yeah I can see HP taking a header over 12 months! Remember, GiGo...Garbage in Garbage out!
  9. Anthony Hook at 11:02am 20th November 2009 One thing that I'm wondering is exactly what is failing. Is it an issue of carrying it around and having a hard drive go bad? For instance, I have a SSD in my EEE and I won't have any problems with data loss due to carrying it around every day and having to worry about a non solid-state hard drive. I guess I'd like to know more.
Close Suggestion Xbox Live Adds FaceBook, Twitter, Last.fm, and Zune HD Video
View Article