Skip to main content

Asus, Toshiba Notebooks Top SquareTrade’s Reliability Figures

HP Mini 5101
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Independent warranty provider SquareTrade has released a study of more than 30,000 notebooks tracked through its extended warranty plans—and the results are a little surprising. Computer makers Asus and Toshiba led the pack in terms of notebook system reliability, with fewer than 10 percent of their systems needing repair after two years, with three-year failure rate projections of about 15.6 and 15.7 percent (respectively). And who’s in last place? Top computer maker Hewlett-Packard, with more than 15 percent of its systems failing after two years, and a three-year projection forecasting over a quarter of them will fail in three years.

“While our study found netbook malfunction rates to be trending 20 percent higher than more expensive laptops, the variance between manufacturer is far greater and should be a bigger factor in making a buying decision,” SquareTrade wrote in its report. “Asus and Toshiba laptops failed just over half as frequently as HP, which makes them a solid bet in terms of reliability.”

Overall, SquareTrade reports that 31 percent of all notebook owners reported a failure to SquareTrade; about two thirds of those failure were hardware malfunctions, while the remaining third of the failures were reported as accidental damage.

Unsurprisingly, Squaretrade finds inexpensive netbooks have higher failure rates than more mainstream notebook computers—and premium notebook systems have lower failure rates still. After a year, some 5.8 percent of netbooks had a malfunction, compared to 4.7 percent of mainstream notebooks and 4.2 percent of premium notebooks—that makes the failure rate for netbooks more than 20 percent higher than entry-level mainstream notebooks and 40 percent higher than premium notebooks. However, SquareTrade does note that netbooks haven’t been on the market very long, so the repair and problem data is still inconclusive.

SquareTrade is in the business of offering independent warranties to consumers. To produce this data, SquareTrade tracked failure rates for over 30,000 new notebook computers covered by SquareTrade warranty plans. Although that sample set is self-selecting—there’s no way of knowing how representative SquareTrade customers are of everyday computer users—the data does suggest significant variations in reliability among computer manufacturers…or significant variations among the way SquareTrade customers select and use different manufacturers’ products.

And industry darling Apple? SquareTrade ranked them number four behind Asus, Toshiba, and Sony, with a two-year failure rate a little over 10 percent and a projected three-year failure rate of 17.4 percent. Above average…barely.

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
This new VR headset beats the Vision Pro in one key way and is half the price
Pimax Crystal Super and Light VR headsets appear on a dark background.

While the Apple Vision Pro offers ultra-high-resolution displays with 23 million pixels, the staggering $3,500 price might inspire you to look for Vision Pro alternatives.

Good news: Pimax just announced two new VR headsets, including a budget model that costs as low as $799 and a more advanced version starting at $1,799. Both are based on the design of one of the best VR headsets currently available -- the Pimax Crystal that launched in May 2023 for $1,599 -- but come with a serious upgrade in terms of resolution.
Pimax Crystal Super

Read more
In 2024, there’s no contest between DLSS and FSR
Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart on the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8.

In modern PC games, you have the difficult decision between Nvidia's Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR). Both are upscaling tools that promise higher frame rates while using the best graphics cards, but there are some key differences between them.

I've been testing DLSS and FSR for years across dozens of games. Choosing between them isn't easy, but after closely examining the two upscalers so many times, there's a clear winner between them.
FSR vs. DLSS: What's the difference?

Read more
10 best gaming monitors of 2024: tested and reviewed
An OLED demo running on the MSI MPG321URX.

There are a ton of options if you are on the hunt for one of the best gaming monitors, but for us, Alienware's 34 QD-OLED still takes the cake in 2024. It's not the display for everyone, though, and after reviewing dozens of the top gaming monitors, we've settled on a list of displays that offer great gaming performance for any budget or purpose.

We're focused specifically on gaming monitors here, which come with higher refresh rates and adaptive sync features like G-Sync and FreeSync. If you're looking for an all-around display, make sure to browse our list of the best monitors.

Read more