Skip to main content

Caltech sets network data transfer record of 186 Gbps

caltech dataAt the Seattle SuperComputing 2011 conference, a team lead by the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) set a new 186 gigabits per second record for computer-to-computer network data transfer—opening a window into our web surfing future, and spitting in the collective eye of current internet service providers.

The international team consisted of high-energy physicists, network engineers and computer scientists from Caltech as well as the University of Victoria, the European Center for Nuclear Research (CERN), University of Michigan, Florida International University and a few other partners.

The 186 Gbps speed beats out the 2009 record of 119 Gbps. The team’s record speed is fast enough to transfer two million gigabytes per day, or roughly 100,000 full, commentary and extras-packed Blu-ray disks in a day.

The speed was achieved with a 100 Gbps circuit, set up by the non-profit BCNET and CANARIE. The combined 186 data rate was sustained between the University of Victoria’s data center in British Columbia and and the Seattle Convention Centre at a top rate of 98 Gbps, and a simultaneous 88 Gbps in the other direction. A larger demonstration was also made, transferring from Seattle to various parts of the US, as well as to partners in Korea and Brazil. ExtremeTech points out that achievement is quite significant since the scientists used a commercially available 100 Gbps link rather than transferring “over private networks under laboratory/testbed conditions”.

We consumers may not need that many Blu-ray disks in a day, but for physicists, this speed could mean important things like understanding space, time and matter better. Small groups and individual physicists could be able to partake of the 100 petabytes (and counting) of data coming from CERN’s Large Hadron Collider more efficiently. 

“Having these tools in our hands allows us to engage in realizable visions others do not have. We can see a clear path to a future others cannot yet imagine with any confidence,” said physics professor and high-energy physics team (HEP) head, Harvey Newman.

Jeff Hughes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
I'm a SF Bay Area-based writer/ninja that loves anything geek, tech, comic, social media or gaming-related.
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more