Clearwire was ranked last in Netflix's rankings of ISP's streaming performance, but the company says bandwidth isn't the whole story: mobility counts too.

In a surprising move, last week Netflix published data on the performance of leading ISPs in the United States and Canada when it came to streaming video to its customers. And while no ISP came through with absolutely flying colors in Netflix’s assessment, wireless WiMax operator Clearwire was pretty consistently at the bottom of the heap. Although Clearwire isn’t disputing Netflix’s claims, it does want to make a couple of notes: Clearwire was the only wireless operator to appear at all in Netflix’s rankings, and it doesn’t matter how fast your cable connection is if you’re nowhere near it.

“We’d like to thank Netflix for ranking us with our wired counterparts and we’re jazzed about our ability to deliver a high-quality streaming experience to Netflix subscribers,” the company wrote in a blog post. “At a time when mobile video streaming is growing at an incredible rate, our network keeps people connected even after they’ve left the house (and their wired network behind).”

And Clearwire does have a point: current wireless network technologies all offer less bandwidth than fixed-line connections like DSL, cable, and fiber optic service. What may be significant about Netflix’s service provider ranking was that Clearwire was the only wireless operator that could be meaningfully be listed alongside fixed-line providers. Although that may change when Verizon and other players get 4G LTE service up and running, for now Clearwire is about the only wireless player in the market that can make a case for delivering Netflix-capable mobile broadband to its customers. And as other players enter the 4G market, between data caps and usage fees, how many of them are going to be able to make a strong case they’re a mobile solution for streaming video services like Netflix?

Showing 3 comments

  1. Joe at 6:51am 1st February 2011 I have Sprint 4G and it works very well, not only for streaming Netflix but also for Ooma VoIP and my UC for work. I put the 4G modem on my windowsill and consistently get 4-5 bars of service. Performance is typically between 4-8 Mbps - not as fast as my old cable provider but plenty fast enough - particularly for 1/2 the price. It's also unlimited so I don't need to worry about how much I'm using - which is about 14-16 GB per month. That would cost me about $140-160 per month on VZ LTE. To answer your question - yes, walls affect all wireless signals by 1-2 bars, regardless of carrier...
  2. PeepingTom at 10:21am 31st January 2011 For those of you who have not tried Clear I will mention my experience. It blew hard. The idea was to get internet access at gf's house (clearly in the middle of their coverage map) and my house (near the edge of their coverage map). Both are in the Dallas area. Signal at gfs was nonexistent, even outside of the house. I had better luck at my house but the latency was too high for gaming and movie streaming was poor. Tethering my laptop with my cell phone was as good as Clear. Bottom line was we canceled the service after a few days. Great concept, poor execution. Good luck to those who choose to stream or game via Clear.
    1. Ian Bell at 11:28am 31st January 2011 I have heard from a number of people that walls will lower the Clear signal by at least two bars. Being in a building in the city is especially rough. From your personal experience, is there any truth to that?
Close Suggestion Plentyoffish attacked by least anonymous hackers ever, user data compromised
View Article