Skip to main content

This guy’s experience with Comcast was so bad, he’s selling his house

comcast pledges better customer service 20 credit hires 5500 reps van
Image used with permission by copyright holder
It’s no secret that dealing with Comcast’s customer service can be a little tricky. From rude name changes on bills, to refusals to cancel service, and even cashing a check that was mistakenly sent to them, there’s a lot that can go wrong when you’re dealing with the massive service provider. Even taking into account their less-than-stellar track record, one potential customer has had so many problems that it looks like he’s going to have to sell the house he just bought three months ago.

The story starts around the end of 2014, when Seth Morabito bought his first home in Kitsap County, Washington. Morabito is a programmer who works from home, so on the short list of needs for a house was consistent access to broadband Internet. Before purchasing the house, he called both Comcast Business and Xfinity to ensure he could get the connection he needed to get his work done without issues. Both companies told him it wouldn’t be an issue, and even mentioned that a previous tenant had Comcast service before, so the setup would be easy. At the end of January, ready to take up residence in his first home, Morabito scheduled Xfinity to come out and hook up his cable, but that’s where the trouble started.

The first tech to arrive noted that what appeared to be a cable box on the side of the home was actually for a satellite connection, the dish for which had been taken down long ago. The tech put in a request to have a new line run from the road to the house, and then left. What followed was an almost comedic — if it wasn’t so tragic — train of installation techs who had no idea what was going on, apologetic customer service reps that didn’t manage to help at all, and quotes in the $50,000-$60,000 range to get Internet running to the house. Eventually, he was told outright that Comcast wouldn’t be providing service to his home. They wouldn’t pay for it, they wouldn’t let him pay for it, and there wouldn’t be any more consideration. If you want to see the exact dates and conversations, he presented his records of the process on his site, along with some answers to questions a lot of people have already asked.

Having exhausted his options, Morabito is faced with selling his brand new home. With only three months of equity on the home, chances are selling it would result in a loss after fees and taxes, plus the time and money spent on finding a new home and moving into it. It’s a cost he’d surely wish he could pass on to Comcast, although it isn’t clear if he has any sort of recourse. Users in the comments on his blog have suggested that next time he get a contract ahead of time that ensures he’ll have access to Internet, or he can back out of the sale. It takes the risk off for next time, but it may be too late to save his first home, which he said “met all of our criteria, and more” complete with a “lovely secluded view of trees, a nice kitchen, and a great home office with a separate entrance.”

He doesn’t mince words when it comes to the experience, stating simply that “throughout this process, Comcast has lied. I don’t throw that word around lightly or flippantly, I mean it sincerely. They’ve fed me false information from the start, and it’s hurt me very badly.” It certainly isn’t the first time Comcast has lied to tried and bring in a new customer, or keep one from leaving, but in this case it has a far more serious consequence than hurt feelings. Morabito still isn’t quite sure how to resolve the situation, but for now he’s relying on an expensive Verizon hotspot with a bandwidth cap that’s too low to get his work done, opting instead for the Wi-Fi at his local Starbucks when he needs to make a big transfer. Hopefully the attention he’s receiving on his post will convince Comcast to take a look at their recently revised customer service standards to figure out whether it actually made a difference.

Editors' Recommendations

Brad Bourque
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Brad Bourque is a native Portlander, devout nerd, and craft beer enthusiast. He studied creative writing at Willamette…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more