Skip to main content

Don’t call it a comeback – AMD announces new Carrizo mobile APUs

amd confirms polaris as next gen gpu hdmi 2 0a support and big efficiency gains amdcarrizo
AMD
Chances are, if you’re looking at a laptop, you’re looking at one powered by Intel, but AMD is hoping to change that with its newly unveiled Carrizo line.

Unfortunately, the Carrizo APU is not one you’ll be able to pick up off a shelf and slam into your desktop machine. These chips will only be available to manufacturers, and are designed for systems with a power envelope that falls between 15 and 35 watts. The low power target makes it a perfect fit for laptops, or smaller systems comparable to the Intel NUC.

AMD hasn’t made the move to 14nm die manufacturing yet, so the Carrizo APU uses the 28nm process, onto which it packs four “Excavator” cores, plus a full GPU. They’ve also made some changes to the design of the chip that increase performance while cutting power usage by 50 percent. It also has a new low power mode that allows it to work with standby modes in Windows 8 and 10.

AMDCarrizoChart
AMD
Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

The GPU in the chip is built from eight Radeon Graphic Compute Units, and is based off the third iteration of AMD’s Graphics Core Next architecture. It can’t compete with discrete level graphics cards, but it should be a step up from most integrated graphics systems, and supports DirectX 12. Importantly, AMD claims it offers a substantial performance leap over Intel integrated graphics.

We know from a leaked roadmap that Carrizo will be followed sometime this year by the Carrizo-L. It will use the same architecture as Carrizo, but will have an even lower targeted system power level of 10-15 watts, and use “Puma+” instead of “Excavator” cores. Even further down the road we expect to see an even lower-power version of these chips called the “Amur” that will reside on a 20nm die, the last before AMD moves to an all-14nm lineup for 2016.

The Carrizo chips should be making their way to manufacturers by the end of the month, so keep your eyes open for systems that include the new APU.

Editors' Recommendations

Brad Bourque
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Brad Bourque is a native Portlander, devout nerd, and craft beer enthusiast. He studied creative writing at Willamette…
Don’t believe the reports about people returning Vision Pros
Someone using Vision Pro at a demo in an Apple Store.

We all know that Apple’s Vision Pro is incredibly expensive -- $3,499 is a huge amount to pay for a mixed-reality headset, even if it is by far the best on the market. That has apparently led to some high-profile Apple fans returning their Vision Pros, and not just because of the price.

In his latest Power On newsletter, Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman says he spoke to over a dozen prominent Apple users who have recently sent their headsets back for a refund. The reasons they returned their products, Gurman says, fell along a few familiar lines.

Read more
This might be why AMD’s FSR 3 isn’t picking up momentum
Combat in the game Nightingale.

AMD's platform-agnostic FSR 3 is a great feature, but months after releasing, it's only available in a small list of titles. Now, we might finally have a clue as to why.

Developers of the upcoming open world survival game Nightingale posted a development update stating that it was removing FSR 3 due to crashes. "After reviewing crash data from the Server Stress Test, a significant number of them seemed to point to FSR3 integrations, whether or not users had the setting turned on," a prelaunch update post reads.

Read more
AMD’s new CPU slammed as ‘anti-consumer at best’
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 propped up against an action figure.

AMD makes some of the best processors, but this one is most likely not one of them. According to a video review of the recently released Ryzen 7 5700, the CPU is not only a letdown -- it's downright misleading. Compared to previous non-X Ryzen processors, the 5700 appears to be significantly cutdown, which affects its performance in a big way.

Historically, AMD's non-X Ryzen CPUs were pretty much the same as their X counterparts, but with slightly lower clock speeds. Take the Ryzen 5 5600 and the Ryzen 5 5600X, for example. Both chips have six cores and 12 threads, as well as 32MB of cache, but the Ryzen 5 5600 has a clock speed of 4.4GHz, while the 5600X hits 4.6GHz. As a result, many chose the non-X part due to it being slightly cheaper while not being a major downgrade.

Read more