Kinect Windows 8

With Microsoft's mobile platform flailing and the "post-PC" age setting in, the company needs a winner to keep its empire intact. Here are the innovative features Windows 8 will need to keep its desktop OS relevant.

Microsoft is perhaps the most dominant company in the history of computing. It has ruled the PC world for two decades, cementing its Windows operating system as the only game in town outside of the minute marketshare of Apple and indie rumblings of Linux. However, the computing world is at an apex; things are beginning to change in big ways. Windows governs the PC world, but we’re fast entering a post-PC era.

Where the PC was the central hub of all things tech for 20 years, new devices have emerged that are shattering that monopoly. Microsoft, unfortunately, has tried too hard and too long to shove its increasingly bloated PC operating system into an ever-shrinking and changing slate of devices. Though it invented tablet PCs and was early to the smartphone game, users have largely rejected these Windows flavors in favor of newer, leaner platforms (iOS, Android, BB) built without the baggage of 20-plus years of PCs tugging on them.

Waking up from its daze, Microsoft went back to the drawing board a couple years back and created Windows Phone 7, a completely new and reinvented mobile OS, spawned from the company’s Zune line of MP3 players (much like iOS spawned from the iPod). Unfortunately, having a separate mobile OS and a PC platform (Windows 7) has lead to a big interface continuity problem; WP7 and W7 do not look or act alike, at all. And then there’s tablets. Microsoft has opted to push Windows 7 onto tablets, a device type it just isn’t made to run on. To complicate matters, early sales of Windows Phone 7, which launched last November, have been slow.

So where does Microsoft go from here? Does it have a chance in this new post-PC world, or will it thrive only in the diminishing market of non-touch, keyboarded PCs? In an earlier article, I gave five reasons why Windows dominance is coming to an end. Today, I’d like to explore seven bold ways that Windows 8 could help reignite the fire for Windows on all devices.

Three screens

Microsoft knows that Windows 8 must bridge the huge interface gap between Windows 7 and Windows Phone 7. It needs to be an OS that is lean enough to run in some capacity on Nokia’s feature phones (per the new Nokia-Microsoft deal), but powerful enough to scale to smartphones, tablets, laptops, PCs, and televisions of all sizes. It needs to run on every screen — touch, 3D, or other — in a expected and elegant way. Microsoft is already on the right track with Windows Phone, Bing, and Xbox 360 — three creations that wouldn’t exist if Microsoft hadn’t encountered stiff competition in the smartphone, search, and videogame markets. When pushed by tough competition, the company has a remarkable ability to finally get creative and conjure up fantastic and consistent user experiences. They need to take that fear and place it on the PC Windows platform as well.

…and a cloud

Windows 8 needs to work on any size device, but it also should take cloud computing to a new level. While competitors like Google are completely cloud-based, Microsoft’s approach has been to create a dual-use experience, where items can be accessed locally and stored on the Web. This is the right approach. Many are (or will be) wary of storing things on the Web, so strategy that retains local storage but seamlessly allows cloud backup of anything and everything would be a very cool and very valuable service. Recent leaked images show Live ID integration into the taskbar.

windows-8-taskbar-live-id

Imagine if you get a virus, and Microsoft could instantly restore your PC to its former state in minutes after a crisis. All you would need is a Live ID. Pictures, videos, music, documents, and programs would be restored from a secure locker on the Web. Sharing pictures and data would also be much easier with heavy integration of services like Facebook (and other Web services) and a general blurring between offline and online services. Taking it a step further, imagine taking a picture on your Windows Phone and having it instantly appear in your pictures folder on your home desktop, netbook, or tablet. Theoretically, your whole family could share music and data between one another via a simple linking of online profiles. And I’m not even scratching the surface. Microsoft has shown that it understands cloud services with Windows Phone and earlier devices like the Kin line of phones. Hopefully the company’s engineers have much cooler ideas than I do.

Keep it simple, Steve

To move forward, Microsoft is going to have to move back and shed some of its baggage. Windows 7 nearly perfects the PC interface MS began with Windows 95, but since the mid 80s, Microsoft has tried to make Windows something for everyone. There are a thousand ways to do anything in Windows — some easy, some convoluted. In this respect, Windows needs to take a cue from iOS and Android (to a lesser degree). Say what you will about Apple, but Steve Jobs is willing to kill what doesn’t work. Microsoft has strived to make Windows the OS for everything, but that goal is precisely what has bogged it down in recent years and prevented the company from more quickly adapting to the changing computing market. Hell, even Bill Gates complained about his own OS some years back. Windows 8 must, by default, rid itself of the clutter of options and icons that have filled Windows the last 15 years. Some users will be irritated, but sometimes to jump a canyon, you gotta drop your pack. In the end, a better product will spur the masses to change.

Windows 8 should take the best elements of Windows Phone, Xbox, and Windows 7 and roll them into one complete package. Hopefully the end result will have more Windows Phone than anything else. It is Microsoft’s most beautiful and simple OS to date.

Keeping it simple extends to OS versions as well. Microsoft launched six versions of Windows 7: Starter, Home Basic, Home Premium, Professional, Enterprise, and Ultimate. A seventh version, Thin PC, will soon be available. Without a chart, I challenge anyone to explain the differences between them all. Windows 8 needs to be much simpler than this. Microsoft isn’t going to give up its enterprise profits, but at most there should be two versions of Windows 8: Home and Business (and Embedded for odd devices). There can be two versions of Office as well.

Showing 10 comments

  1. Onuora Amobi at 3:47am 28th March 2011 Thats cool but check out this article on The top 10 features that Windows 8 should offer businesses http://www.windows8update.com/2011/03/28/the-top-...
  2. Mike Mosier at 12:35pm 10th March 2011 Being into the OS scene pretty heavily, and having used all versions of Windows from 3.11 until Windows 7, a Mac for a year, and at least 10 Linux distributions I can safely say that Windows 7 is the best operating system on the market right now. However, for a decade now Microsoft has a trend of every other version being crap. Also, being in the IT industry I feel if Microsoft decides to throw in a bunch of features that change the default interface, or add additional layers of complexity (cloud) that users will just discount Windows 8 as another Vista. If it is one thing I know, it is that people detest change and forcing users into using a new interface or cloud is a bad move. What can really save Windows in my eyes? keeping it simple and not changing too much and continuing along the success of Windows 7 with Windows 8. Yes, having a separate interface for tablets and smartphones is necessary, but if they force customers to adjust to a new interface no one will adopt it. Couple this with terrible driver support and backwards compatibility due to needing to store stuff in the cloud, and you have Windows Vista R2
  3. ioman at 6:53pm 8th March 2011 Why would you both compare a tablet with a PC though? A tablet in my mind is complementary, not a replacement for a laptop or desktop.
    1. broncobeta at 10:41am 9th March 2011 This article stats that the world is coming into a "post-pc" era that Microsoft cannot keep up with in it's current state. I was simply stating that I too think the tablet is complementary and will completely replace PCs.
      1. Jeffrey Van Camp at 10:46am 9th March 2011 I don't think it will completely replace PCs, or at least the idea of a screen + keyboard + mouse combination. The keyboard is a very useful feature that seems to keep cropping up, even in smartphones.
        1. broncobeta at 12:00pm 9th March 2011 Sorry if it seemed like I was discrediting your article in anyway. I very much enjoyed your piece and I agreed with many of the statements within it. My only peeve is with this whole "post-pc" notion that websites, not necessarily digital trends, make seem like tablets will be the end all be all and we can throw away our physical keyboards and mouses for good.
          1. Jeffrey Van Camp at 1:30pm 9th March 2011 Ah, I get ya. Yeah it's becoming a popular word. Tablets are hot right now, but they won't be forever. They're just one piece of the puzzle. I think Post-PC really means a world where the PC isn't the end-all-be-all of the computing world like it has been for 20 years. In the future, PCs will be one of many equally weighted computing devices which will probably include tablet type devices and smartphones. Really, we'll be using all of these devices in coordination to go about our daily lives. Not to get political, but it's a lot like how the United States is learning to deal with the rise of other countries around the world. While it is still dominant in many economic sectors, there will come a day when countries like China, India, and others will be on a level playing field with the U.S.
  4. broncobeta at 12:13pm 8th March 2011 Will there be a day where you create "post-pc" applications on a "post-pc" device? I sure as hell hope not. In terms of business and education I'm not sure a tablet will be able to out do a PC. I'm not going to give my kid a Xoom or iPad for Christmas and then go tell him type that 4 page paper and code his computer science homework. All my kid will do with a tablet is sit on the couch and play Angry Birds or browse the web in a lack-luster fashion since most sites are not completed geared for tablets (and if they are, it's a dumbed down lesser experience). This argument is very similar to those who stated the XML would once completely replace HTML. It all seems like to me that us as consumers want specific devices for specific purposes rather than an multi-tool for everything. It's sad in a way, because companies have somehow found how to make us demand a lesser product and still pay the same amount, if not more, for it.
    1. NP27 at 1:35pm 8th March 2011 Totally agreeing with you. I've been wondering, who (using a tablet for productivity) would purchase a $700 tablet with only 32GB of hard drive, when i could purchase a high quality desktop PC with 500GB? But do you know why people buy tablets? They're flashy, and stylish, with touch screens and nice portability. Hey, I'm not saying I hate tablets... maybe I would buy one now. Now, seeing as I have already purchased a PC
      1. broncobeta at 2:51pm 8th March 2011 My friend is currently stranded with only an iPad and I use the word stranded intentionally. He has quickly figured out that not everything is "post the pc". FYI, I bought my desktop ASUS (i5 3.2GHz, 1TB, 6GB) for $700 and received a 22' monitor as well.
Close Suggestion Samsung denies Galaxy Tab 10.1 remodel, sticks to launch schedule
View Article