<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.digitaltrends.com/xml/digitaltrends.xsd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Now The Most Vulnerable Browser?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/firefox-now-the-most-vulnerable-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/firefox-now-the-most-vulnerable-browser/</link>
	<description>Digital Trends is your home for technology news, CE product reviews, mobile app reviews and daily videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:19:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla names Gary Kovacs new CEO (Digital Trends) &#124; techkochi.com</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/firefox-now-the-most-vulnerable-browser/#comment-187601</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla names Gary Kovacs new CEO (Digital Trends) &#124; techkochi.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=61930#comment-187601</guid>
		<description>[...] While once known as the most lean and secure browser, its reputation in recent years has lagged. The successful launch of Firefox 4 among computing and mobile platforms will be Kovac’s first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While once known as the most lean and secure browser, its reputation in recent years has lagged. The successful launch of Firefox 4 among computing and mobile platforms will be Kovac’s first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla names Gary Kovacs new CEO</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/firefox-now-the-most-vulnerable-browser/#comment-185527</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla names Gary Kovacs new CEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=61930#comment-185527</guid>
		<description>[...] While once known as the most lean and secure browser, its reputation in recent years has lagged. The successful launch of Firefox 4 among computing and mobile platforms will be Kovac&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While once known as the most lean and secure browser, its reputation in recent years has lagged. The successful launch of Firefox 4 among computing and mobile platforms will be Kovac&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DANNY CONWAY</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/firefox-now-the-most-vulnerable-browser/#comment-150051</link>
		<dc:creator>DANNY CONWAY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 13:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=61930#comment-150051</guid>
		<description>i agree. i just got a virus on fire fox that sent all my data to a third party. i had to change all my passwords. a real pain in the as. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree. i just got a virus on fire fox that sent all my data to a third party. i had to change all my passwords. a real pain in the as.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ides of December</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/firefox-now-the-most-vulnerable-browser/#comment-114323</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ides of December</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=61930#comment-114323</guid>
		<description>Of course the Firefox and Apple apologists will come out in force on this. When IE was consistantly the least secure browser NOBODY question the data. BUt now that FF and Apple topthe list, of course the data is false, misleading, and the result of shady security companies. The facts are this: Criminals will exploit anything. So it only makes sense that as FF and Safari usage grows so will the number of cyber criminals that target them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the Firefox and Apple apologists will come out in force on this. When IE was consistantly the least secure browser NOBODY question the data. BUt now that FF and Apple topthe list, of course the data is false, misleading, and the result of shady security companies. The facts are this: Criminals will exploit anything. So it only makes sense that as FF and Safari usage grows so will the number of cyber criminals that target them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/firefox-now-the-most-vulnerable-browser/#comment-3028</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=61930#comment-3028</guid>
		<description>It made sense to me. Vulnerable doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s the least secure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It made sense to me. Vulnerable doesn&#39;t mean it&#39;s the least secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/firefox-now-the-most-vulnerable-browser/#comment-3029</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=61930#comment-3029</guid>
		<description>These security firms are shady, they expose leaks and then ask the companies to hire them to fix them. MY questions: Were they really leaks in the first place, or were they just simply hacked?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These security firms are shady, they expose leaks and then ask the companies to hire them to fix them. MY questions: Were they really leaks in the first place, or were they just simply hacked?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veri</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/firefox-now-the-most-vulnerable-browser/#comment-3027</link>
		<dc:creator>Veri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=61930#comment-3027</guid>
		<description>All the document contains are a list of percentages with no explanation of what they consider a vulnerability. Are extensions included for instance?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s better to go to their security center rather than enlist the help of this scammer like company.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.mozilla.org/security/&quot;&quot;&gt;http://www.mozilla.org/security/&quot;&lt;/a&gt; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.mozilla.org/security/&quot;&gt;http://www.mozilla.org/security/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the document contains are a list of percentages with no explanation of what they consider a vulnerability. Are extensions included for instance?</p>
<p>It&#39;s better to go to their security center rather than enlist the help of this scammer like company.<br /><a href="<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.mozilla.org/security/""></a><a href="http://www.mozilla.org/security/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mozilla.org/security/</a>&#8220; rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.mozilla.org/security/">http://www.mozilla.org/security/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TamaracGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/firefox-now-the-most-vulnerable-browser/#comment-3018</link>
		<dc:creator>TamaracGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=61930#comment-3018</guid>
		<description>&quot;which means that although Firefox had the most vulnerabilities reported, that doesn’t actually mean its the least secure browser&quot;. If that&#039;s true, then why the title of &quot;Firefox Now The Most Vulnerable Browser?&quot; Comeon guys, how about learning to come up with titles like real reporters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;which means that although Firefox had the most vulnerabilities reported, that doesn’t actually mean its the least secure browser&#8221;. If that&#39;s true, then why the title of &#8220;Firefox Now The Most Vulnerable Browser?&#8221; Comeon guys, how about learning to come up with titles like real reporters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via cdn.digitaltrends.com

Served from: www.digitaltrends.com @ 2012-02-16 13:15:00 -->
