Google Apps ditching older browsers

By Geoff Duncan June 2, 2011

Google Apps — Image used with permission by copyright holder

Google Apps has been leveraging nascent HTML5 capabilities to add bonus functionality to Gmail and Google Apps for a while now, but now the company is going to start requiring “modern” browsers with reasonably full HTML5 capabilities for its Google Apps products. As of August 1, Google Docs will support only the current and the most recent prior major release of Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, and Safari. Among the browsers being left in the dust: Firefox 3.5, Safari 3, and Internet Explorer 7.

“For Web applications to spring even farther ahead of traditional software, our teams need to make use of new capabilities available in modern browsers,” wrote Google VP of engineering Venkat Panchapakesan. “These new browsers are more than just a modern convenience, they are a necessity for what the future holds.”

Google is not saying it will be blocking older browsers outright; instead, the company warns that older browsers may start having trouble with features in Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Talk, Google Docs, and Google Sites; eventually, the services may stop working in older browsers entirely. The new requirements don’t (yet) shut out users running Microsoft’s venerable Windows XP operating system: IE8 supports XP, as does Firefox 3.6. However, as Google moves forward and drops support for the most recent major versions of browsers—particularly as IE and Firefox convert to more-frequent release schedules—Windows XP users are likely to be left out in the cold—so are users of older PowerPC-based Macintosh systems.

Google, of course, would be pleased if everyone using older browsers would give its own Chrome browser a shot—it’s a good bet that Google will ensure its Google Apps and related services work well with Chrome before they worry about tweaking them for other browsers, even the mighty Internet Explorer.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics

Apps
Google

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…

Computing

4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Computing

Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3

A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Computing

Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs

Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.