Google Confuses Us with Its Charming TV Appearance

google_search_2

We are still puzzled by Google's Super Bowl commercial advertising its "search engine capabilities," rather than one of its other products.

Riddle me this, Google execs and PR department: Why did Google choose to market its search engine—probably the only product that doesn’t need advertising—in a very expensive Super Bowl commercial? That, Google, is the only real question we have for you. Why market something that’s already a winner in its space and beyond? Google’s search engine already holds roughly two-thirds of the market.

What about the Nexus One? The new smartphone has not done well in the mobile markets, selling only a mere 80,000 handsets since early January. The Nexus One could use a little bit of advertising—aside from YouTube—don’t you think?

The Wall Street Journal thinks the endearing Super Bowl advertisement was nothing more than Google finally realizing how it can market itself—something the company has steered away from and seemed to do just fine without. In the past year, Google has promoted its new Chrome browser via television and billboard, but that’s about the gist of the company’s advertising campaign. Baby steps, Google, baby steps—you too could have ads featuring Megan Fox and Luke Wilson someday.

In case you missed it, here is Google’s commercial called “Parisian Love.”


Trackback URL: http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/google-confuses-us-with-its-charming-tv-appearance/trackback/

  • Actually I thought it's aim was to show all the things you could do from one interface - the google search home page. So we saw maps, dictionary definitions, wikipedia, flight arrivals, street photos... it just started from what everyone knows well - plain ol' search.

    As to whether it should be using TV, and a superbowl TV spot in particular, is a good question. Perhaps they have identified that people don't know all the things that can be done from that original simple interface?
  • Mike Jones
    The Google commercial was one of the worst commercials in the super bowl. Google is the most overrated company in history. They are the AOL of present day. Google's commercial had 0 production value, wasn't funny, and didn't tell me what I already know about Google.
  • bigmike111
    you're an idiot.

    It's not supposed to tell you something you don't know--it's supposed to be a charming anecdote portrayed through their online service.

    The production value was in showing us that google is important to everyone--in everyway
  • James
    I thought the commercial was pretty old looking, like something you would see in the 1990's. Not very forward at all.
  • Great commercial, really nice way to tell a story. And I find it funny that the WSJ is writing a story on Google and Google can't index it. :) Way to go Rupert!
blog comments powered by Disqus

Join The Digital Trends Community

DT RSS Feed

Everyone wants to be an insider, and you can be one too! Choose your poison: sign-up for our Newsletter, join us on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter. Do all three and you'll be swimming in the the latest news, reviews, videos and more gadget goodness!

DT Newsletter Sign-Up

Sign-up for the Digital Trends newsletter and find out about the latest contests, the hottest content, and the most popular videos. Let us keep you up-to-date!

Our Facebook

Become a DT soldier! Join us on Facebook and share the best news, guides, videos and other cool information directly with all your friends. Some might even thank you for it!

Join the thousands and follow the best of us on Facebook.

Twitter Us

Do you like information in small snippets? Then our Twitter feed is just for you. Follow Digital Trends and you'll be able to catch up daily on our latest content, or even interact directly with our team. Tweet Tweet!

Join the thousands and follow the best of us on Twitter.

That's Right, Sign-up For Our Monthly Random Prize Drawings and You Could Be That Winner.