Comments on: Google Confuses Us with Its Charming TV Appearance http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/google-confuses-us-with-its-charming-tv-appearance/ Digital Trends is your home for technology news, CE product reviews, mobile app reviews and daily videos. Fri, 17 Feb 2012 04:00:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: bigmike111 http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/google-confuses-us-with-its-charming-tv-appearance/#comment-127669 bigmike111 Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:12:00 +0000 http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=174756#comment-127669 you're an idiot.<br><br>It's not supposed to tell you something you don't know--it's supposed to be a charming anecdote portrayed through their online service.<br><br>The production value was in showing us that google is important to everyone--in everyway you're an idiot.

It's not supposed to tell you something you don't know–it's supposed to be a charming anecdote portrayed through their online service.

The production value was in showing us that google is important to everyone–in everyway

]]> By: Bruce http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/google-confuses-us-with-its-charming-tv-appearance/#comment-125034 Bruce Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:28:50 +0000 http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=174756#comment-125034 Actually I thought it's aim was to show all the things you could do from one interface - the google search home page. So we saw maps, dictionary definitions, wikipedia, flight arrivals, street photos... it just started from what everyone knows well - plain ol' search.<br><br>As to whether it should be using TV, and a superbowl TV spot in particular, is a good question. Perhaps they have identified that people don't know all the things that can be done from that original simple interface? Actually I thought it's aim was to show all the things you could do from one interface – the google search home page. So we saw maps, dictionary definitions, wikipedia, flight arrivals, street photos… it just started from what everyone knows well – plain ol' search.

As to whether it should be using TV, and a superbowl TV spot in particular, is a good question. Perhaps they have identified that people don't know all the things that can be done from that original simple interface?

]]> By: James http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/google-confuses-us-with-its-charming-tv-appearance/#comment-122453 James Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:51:31 +0000 http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=174756#comment-122453 I thought the commercial was pretty old looking, like something you would see in the 1990's. Not very forward at all. I thought the commercial was pretty old looking, like something you would see in the 1990's. Not very forward at all.

]]> By: Mike Jones http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/google-confuses-us-with-its-charming-tv-appearance/#comment-122451 Mike Jones Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:38:54 +0000 http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=174756#comment-122451 The Google commercial was one of the worst commercials in the super bowl. Google is the most overrated company in history. They are the AOL of present day. Google's commercial had 0 production value, wasn't funny, and didn't tell me what I already know about Google. The Google commercial was one of the worst commercials in the super bowl. Google is the most overrated company in history. They are the AOL of present day. Google's commercial had 0 production value, wasn't funny, and didn't tell me what I already know about Google.

]]> By: Fayetteville Video http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/google-confuses-us-with-its-charming-tv-appearance/#comment-122369 Fayetteville Video Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:23:55 +0000 http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=174756#comment-122369 Great commercial, really nice way to tell a story. And I find it funny that the WSJ is writing a story on Google and Google can't index it. :) Way to go Rupert! Great commercial, really nice way to tell a story. And I find it funny that the WSJ is writing a story on Google and Google can't index it. :) Way to go Rupert!

]]>