Skip to main content

Has clock speed outlived its usefulness as a processor specification?

Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro
Image used with permission by copyright holder
There was once a time when a processor ran at a single, set clock speed. It ran at that speed all day, every day, unless it was purposely over or under-clocked by a user. In this simpler time there was no question what you’d receive when you bought a CPU. A 1GHz chip ran at 1GHz, end of story.

Today, though, the story is more complex. Intel introduced Turbo Boost, a dynamic, automatic over-clocking feature, in 2008, and it’s become more and more common since. Most processors sold today change their clock speed based on power draw and thermal headroom.

That’s great for efficiency. It ensures a chip doesn’t need to run at a higher clock than required for a particular task, greatly reducing power draw and heat at idle and near-idle states. But it also means that performance isn’t as straightforward. Varying cooling solutions can impact the performance of a system.

Anandtech, in a recent article, found this variance has become a serious issue. The site’s roundup of three Core M equipped laptops discovered the supposedly quicker Core M-5Y71, which has a clock speed of up to 2.9GHz, was sometimes outperformed by the Core M-5Y10, which boasts a maximum clock of only 2GHz.

This applied to both processor and graphics benchmarks. We’re not talking a small gap, either; in some cases, the supposedly slower Core M-5Y10 was over 20 percent quicker than the Core M-5Y71. The difference, of course, was the laptop. Anandtech tested an Asus Zenbook UX305 with the Core M-5Y10, while the Core M-5Y71 was represented by a Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro and a Dell Venue 11 Pro 7000.

These results aren’t entirely a surprise. It’s been clear since the introduction of Turbo Boost that manufacturer design can impact performance, particularly in laptops, which are more likely to face thermal constraints. The initially small gap between systems has only widened, though, and these results prove it has grown into a chasm.

If a processor with a higher listed clock speed does not prove superior, has the buyer been deceived?

While Anandtech’s article does a very through job testing Core M, its conclusion fails to touch an obvious question; are consumers getting what they expect? It’s arguable that they’re not. Anyone picking up a Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro with a Core M-5Y71 would likely feel confident that it’d outperform a Zenbook with a lesser chip, but that’s not necessarily true. And if that’s not true, is the buyer being deceived?

Not intentionally, I’m sure. There’s no particular reason for Intel to mis-label its chips, and indeed, the issue is largely out of its hands. Manufacturers are responsible for system design; as Anandtech’s article notes, the Dell Venue 11 features a plastic cover rather than metal, which Intel considers optimal. Thermal performance suffers as a result, and the Venue ends up slower than its specifications suggest.

Still, it’s worth considering whether the current branding scheme has outlived its usefulness. We may be on the verge of an era in which clock speed ceases to be a useful indicator. What will replace it? That, I must admit, I don’t know.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
AMD may use Samsung’s 4nm node for Chromebook processors
A digital depiction of an AMD Ryzen 5000G chip.

AMD may soon work with the Samsung chip foundry in order to prepare 4nm Chromebook processors, according to Gokul Hariharan, an analyst at J.P. Morgan.

AMD has previously only worked with two semiconductor factories -- TSMC and GlobalFoundries -- but if the report proves to be true, the cooperation with Samsung may also extend to graphics cards.

Read more
Intel Alder Lake processors might outperform previous gen by over 50%
An engineer smiles as she holds up two processor chips.

Update: Intel's new line of Alder Lake processors have now been officially launched at the company's Innovation event. Intel's claims include the 50% boost in multi-core performance over the previous generation.

Today, new CPU-Z benchmarks emerged, showcasing the performance of the upcoming Intel Core i5-11600K, as part of Intel's 12th-gen Alder Lake processors. Designed as an affordable mid-tier option, this CPU outperformed the previous generation by miles -- and this applies to chips from both Intel and AMD models from the past.

Read more
The price of Intel’s upcoming Alder Lake processors has been leaked on Amazon
Promotional image of an Intel Core desktop processor.

With the upcoming launch of Intel Alder Lake processors around a month away, many PC builders are anxious to hear more about the pricing of these CPUs. While we are not likely to hear any official confirmation directly from Intel before its Innovation event near the end of October, it seems that Amazon indirectly spoiled the prices ahead of time.

Listings of a few 12th Generation Intel Core processors appeared on several Amazon websites, including Amazon NL, Amazon FR, Amazon Italy, and Amazon UK. These listings were then shared by @DellChannel21 and @momomo_us on Twitter, showing the alleged prices to a wider audience.

Read more