<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel and AMD Quad-Core Rhetoric Heats Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/intel-and-amd-quad-core-rhetoric-heats-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/intel-and-amd-quad-core-rhetoric-heats-up/</link>
	<description>Upgrade Your Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:59:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/intel-and-amd-quad-core-rhetoric-heats-up/#comment-53478</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53478</guid>
		<description>One thing you all seem to be forgetting when considering cost is the price of the whole system vs just the processor cost. If the processor price is vastly different, e.g. two or three hundred dollars different, then you have a point about which company is scrambling. But for now, the company still scrambling is Intel..... inspite of the better benchmarks.... we&#039;ll have to wait and see how the market reacts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing you all seem to be forgetting when considering cost is the price of the whole system vs just the processor cost. If the processor price is vastly different, e.g. two or three hundred dollars different, then you have a point about which company is scrambling. But for now, the company still scrambling is Intel&#8230;.. inspite of the better benchmarks&#8230;. we&#039;ll have to wait and see how the market reacts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not So Sure</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/intel-and-amd-quad-core-rhetoric-heats-up/#comment-53474</link>
		<dc:creator>Not So Sure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53474</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think so Greg.  If you&#039;re buying a new system in a month or so (far enough off that MB&#039;s aren&#039;t outrageously overpriced), I think you&#039;re more likely to look at either 6300 or maybe one model up than an AMD.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well at least that&#039;s what I&#039;d do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OTOH, if you already have an AMD 939 board (like i do), there&#039;s no compelling reason to change platforms, unless you live on the bleeding edge.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end, the question is how long will it take for AMD to have competitive products in the $180-$230 range.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 6300 comes close to an FX62.  And there&#039;s no way that chip is dropping below $300.00.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m pulling for AMD, but I think this round goes to Intel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think so Greg.  If you&#039;re buying a new system in a month or so (far enough off that MB&#039;s aren&#039;t outrageously overpriced), I think you&#039;re more likely to look at either 6300 or maybe one model up than an AMD.  </p>
<p>Well at least that&#039;s what I&#039;d do.</p>
<p>OTOH, if you already have an AMD 939 board (like i do), there&#039;s no compelling reason to change platforms, unless you live on the bleeding edge.  </p>
<p>In the end, the question is how long will it take for AMD to have competitive products in the $180-$230 range.  </p>
<p>The 6300 comes close to an FX62.  And there&#039;s no way that chip is dropping below $300.00.</p>
<p>I&#039;m pulling for AMD, but I think this round goes to Intel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: star gate sg1</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/intel-and-amd-quad-core-rhetoric-heats-up/#comment-53475</link>
		<dc:creator>star gate sg1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53475</guid>
		<description>Greg: It&#039;s true what you said about AMD. But so did Intel. Who is acctually scrambling is AMD.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We&#039;ll see what happes to quad core...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg: It&#039;s true what you said about AMD. But so did Intel. Who is acctually scrambling is AMD.</p>
<p>We&#039;ll see what happes to quad core&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Viklund</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/intel-and-amd-quad-core-rhetoric-heats-up/#comment-53477</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Viklund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 04:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53477</guid>
		<description>AMD did cut their prices today by alot. The model 5000+ will be priced like 3800+ was priced before and I guess 3800+ will be very very cheap. And when you think about it, 3800+ is screaming fast. I&#039;m sitting on a 3000+ today and it&#039;s realy realy fast and it&#039;s enough for most things so I think this was very smart by AMD it will drive up the sales of AMD chips and today they announced they they will buy ATi so the future looks great and promesing. I will continue to build computers on the AMD chip but Intel looks great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMD did cut their prices today by alot. The model 5000+ will be priced like 3800+ was priced before and I guess 3800+ will be very very cheap. And when you think about it, 3800+ is screaming fast. I&#039;m sitting on a 3000+ today and it&#039;s realy realy fast and it&#039;s enough for most things so I think this was very smart by AMD it will drive up the sales of AMD chips and today they announced they they will buy ATi so the future looks great and promesing. I will continue to build computers on the AMD chip but Intel looks great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/intel-and-amd-quad-core-rhetoric-heats-up/#comment-53476</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53476</guid>
		<description>The reason AMD is lowering prices is to compete with the upcoming Core 2 Duo, a processor that beats out AMD in almost every benchmark.  Scramble? ....hardly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason AMD is lowering prices is to compete with the upcoming Core 2 Duo, a processor that beats out AMD in almost every benchmark.  Scramble? &#8230;.hardly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/intel-and-amd-quad-core-rhetoric-heats-up/#comment-53473</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53473</guid>
		<description>I was just told that AMD has lowered the prices on a lot of their processors. I think Intel is going to have to scramble hard to get back on track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just told that AMD has lowered the prices on a lot of their processors. I think Intel is going to have to scramble hard to get back on track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
