Skip to main content

Intel and AMD take another step into the future with perceptual computing

Image used with permission by copyright holder

What if you could navigate your tablet while cooking dinner by swiping your hands through the air? Or connect your computer to your display with a literal snap of your fingers?

Both Intel and AMD have teased this long anticipated future at CES 2013. Intel, which is lumping motion and voice controls under the term “perceptual computing,” showed a number of tech demos from the company’s labs. In one, a user playing “Where’s Waldo” with an eye-tracking camera, was able to “find” the famous character by pausing his gaze on the famous character. Another demo used hand movement to grab a companion cube in Portal 2 and move it on top of a button.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

A 3D motion-tracking camera made these demonstrations possible. Intel promised that it will be more affordable than Microsoft’s Kinect, and will work via a single USB connection (Kinect requires additional external power).

AMD showed a video with more practical implications at its conference. One short clip depicted a cook navigating a recipe on a tablet by swiping through the air. Another focused on media navigation via gestures. These features will be enabled on some systems shipping with the company’s latest A8 and A10 mobile APUs. No external camera is required.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

The technology is still rough, but it is improving rapidly. We’ve seen the promise of this through motion based controller’s like Microsoft’s Kinect, but they were just the first step. This is the next. We’re excited to see an alternative to touch and believe the backing of both major x86 processor companies – as well as numerous smaller companies on the show floor – could make perceptual computing the Next Big Thing at CES 2014.

Editors' Recommendations

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
AMD isn’t competing with Intel anymore — Threadripper just wins
The Threadripper 7980X CPU installed in a motherboard.

The era of high-end desktops (HEDT) disappeared a few years ago. Intel's long-abandoned X-series processors dried up, and AMD relegated its Threadripper CPUs to the enterprise market, leaving enthusiasts with cash to burn to settle for flagships instead of HEDT. That is, until now.

AMD's Threadripper 7000 CPUs are bringing HEDT back, making even the best processors look puny in comparison. After taking a generation off, AMD is reviving Threadripper for consumer desktops. That fact alone makes these CPUs important -- even you ignore the obscene performance numbers they put up. AMD has now carved out a performance class that it can call its own, straddling the line between flagship consumer chips and data center CPUs where Intel doesn't have any options.

Read more
AMD’s new CPUs decisively end the high-performance battle with Intel
A person holding the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

AMD is putting its foot down. In what Donny Woligroski, senior processor technical marketing manager at AMD, called the "worst-kept secret" in the world of desktop processors, Team Red announced it's bringing its wildly popular Threadripper chips back to high-end desktops. They're destined to be some of the best processors money can buy, and Intel currently has no way to compete.

If you're not up to speed, AMD quietly and unceremoniously ended its Threadripper series for desktops a little over a year ago. When the company announced its previous generation of Threadripper CPUs, it revealed it would stick with the Enterprise-grade Pro series chips going forward. A little over 12 months after that announcement, AMD is reversing course.

Read more
I’m fed up with the AMD vs. Nvidia vs. Intel discourse, and you should be too
AMD RX 6600 among other graphics cards.

The rivalry between AMD, Nvidia, and Intel is exciting to watch at times. Which tech giant makes the best processors? What about graphics cards? This discourse is a bit of fun any PC enthusiast can have online, but too often, it devolves into something that can persuade buyers into bad purchases and push loyal fans into branded camps.

A little bit of competition between all three chipmakers is a good thing, but frankly, the amount of misinformation that stems from it makes life harder for most users. Here's why I'm sick of the never-ending online battle of AMD versus Intel versus Nvidia, and why you should be, too.
Misinformation and bias

Read more