Skip to main content

Intel reveals flaw in Sandy Bridge chipsets

Chipmaker Intel has revealed that its latest and greatest Sandy Bridge CPUs—the latest in its Intel Core line that it promoted triumphantly at CES—contain a design flaw. Intel has halted production of Sandy Bridge chips to implement a fix—all told, the solution will cost about $700 million, and Intel is scaling back its revenue forecast for the first quarter of $300 million due to reduced sales volume.

The design issue impacts Serial ATA (SATA) ports that the chipsets use to communicate with hard disk drives and other devices like DVD and Blu-ray drives; over time, the ports within the chipsets may degrade, impacting the performance of connected storage devices or preventing the chips from being able to connect to the devices at all. Intel says it has corrected the design issue and has already begun manufacturing a corrected version of the chipset; however, the company is quick to point out that the Sandy Bridge CPUs themselves—the heart of the system—are not impacted.

The faulty systems have been shipping to computer makers and other OEMs since January 9. Although relatively few consumers will be impacted by the issue, anyone who has purchased systems with Intel’s second-generation Core i5 and Core i7 quad-core systems should consider contacting the manufacturer or the system to see about repair or replacement. Intel doesn’t believe those systems are in any danger of immediate failure, but customers should work with the manufactures of their products to get a permanent solution.

The announcement of the chip flaw—and the interruption in Sandy Bridge manufacturing—has has a significant impact on Intel’s financials: trading in the company’s stock was temporarily halted on the New York Stock Exchange prior to the announcement, and the investment community is less-than-pleased with a $700 million cost to implement the repair and replace effected systems already on the market, plus $300 million more in lost sales. From an investor’s point of view, that’s a billion dollars Intel had last week that’s gone today.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
I tested Intel’s Core i5-14600K against its cheaper sibling. Don’t waste your money
Intel Core i5-13600K installed in a motherboard.

Intel's new Core i5-14600K isn't a massive generational leap, as you can read in our Core i5-14600K review. No one expected it to be with Intel's 13th-gen CPUs already sitting among the best processors. The bigger question is if it's worth buying over last-gen's Core i5-13600K considering that both are readily available for around the same price.

I've tested both chips extensively across a range of productivity and gaming scenarios. The Core i5-14600K brings some minor improvements over its last-gen counterpart, but those looking to stretch their dollar the furthest are better off sticking with the Core i5-13600K.
Pricing and availability
An Intel 13th-generation 13600K Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Read more
This Intel gaming handheld could give the Steam Deck a run for its money
Emdoor's gaming handheld with an Intel CPU and GPU inside.

All of the most popular gaming handhelds, such as the Steam Deck or the Asus ROG Ally, are currently powered by AMD APUs. However, Intel Meteor Lake is about to change that narrative. Emdoor has just previewed its upcoming handheld with a Meteor Lake chip and Intel Arc 5 graphics inside, and it looks like AMD might have some serious competition on the horizon.

This is a new venture for both Emdoor, which has previously been known for mini PCs and tablets, and Intel, which hasn't really participated in the recent boom for portable gaming PCs. The result of this cooperation looks like a handheld along the likes of the Ayaneo console we've already seen before. Thanks to a preview shared by Notebook Italia, we know more about its design and specs.

Read more
I tested the Intel Core i9-14900K against the Core i9-13900K, and it’s not pretty
Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.

Intel's new Core i9-14900K is a tough processor to evaluate. It brings the same number of cores and the same architecture as last-gen's Core i9-13900K, but Intel asserts that the new chip delivers some performance improvements. Is that true, and is it worth ditching last-gen's flagship for what Intel claims is its best processor?

The Core i9-14900K fixes some of the weaker areas of the Core i9-13900K. However, as you can read in our Intel Core i9-14900K review, the new processor does very little to justify spending a higher price for largely the same performance.
Pricing and availability

Read more