<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.digitaltrends.com/xml/digitaltrends.xsd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Guts SCO&#8217;s Case Against IBM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/judge-guts-scos-case-against-ibm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/judge-guts-scos-case-against-ibm/</link>
	<description>Digital Trends is your home for technology news, CE product reviews, mobile app reviews and daily videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:51:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/judge-guts-scos-case-against-ibm/#comment-53401</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 19:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-53401</guid>
		<description>I wouldnt touch anything with SCO with a ten foot pole.  Truth be told, I&#039;m really surprised that they are still operating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldnt touch anything with SCO with a ten foot pole.  Truth be told, I&#039;m really surprised that they are still operating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendell Cochran</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/judge-guts-scos-case-against-ibm/#comment-53400</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendell Cochran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 09:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-53400</guid>
		<description>SCO v Novell is _not_ an extension of SCO v IBM.  SCO accuses Novell of slander of title -- slander by saying out loud in public that Novell (not SCO) owns Unix copyrights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone who follows SCO v Novell must bear in mind that by law any transfer of copyright must be in writing.  SCO argues that transfer was intended, but intent won&#039;t wash in court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SCO v Novell is _not_ an extension of SCO v IBM.  SCO accuses Novell of slander of title &#8212; slander by saying out loud in public that Novell (not SCO) owns Unix copyrights.</p>
<p>Anyone who follows SCO v Novell must bear in mind that by law any transfer of copyright must be in writing.  SCO argues that transfer was intended, but intent won&#039;t wash in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via cdn.digitaltrends.com

Served from: www.digitaltrends.com @ 2012-02-14 13:19:44 -->
