Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Kaspersky fingers ‘Poseidon’ for attacks dating back to 2001

Add as a preferred source on Google

The first ever Portuguese-speaking targeted attack group responsible for a decade-long series of cyber attacks has just been revealed in a new report from Kaspersky Lab. The security firm is pointing toward an individual or group referred to as “Poseidon” as the source of this campaign, which has largely targeted corporate victims across a range of different industries.

It’s thought that Poseidon went relatively unnoticed during that period because its various attacks were not previously linked to one another. Security firms and enthusiasts alike spotted individual cases, but it wasn’t until last year that Kaspersky’s Global Research and Analysis Team — otherwise known as GReAT — managed to put the pieces together.

Recommended Videos

Poseidon targeted companies with spear-phishing emails containing attached RTF files (Rich Text Format) and Microsoft Word documents. These messages were typically directed toward human-resources workers, and contained malware that enabled the attacker to thoroughly explore the topography of the target network, according to a report from PC World.

From there, Poseidon would steal intellectual property and trade secrets, which could then be used to blackmail the target. Organizations have been coerced into taking on the services of the Poseidon Group as a security firm, who would supposedly help fix the problems they were experiencing — of course, malware was often left behind for future usage.

Kaspersky reports that Poseidon made attacks on government institutions, banks, telecommunications firms, and media groups, among others. Its activities have been traced back to at least 2005, but the oldest sample found suggests that the scheme was in the works as early as 2001.

Poseidon survived this long by making regular changes to the way it perpetrated attacks, something that will be more difficult now that Kaspersky has a handle on its methods. As part of the company’s research into the group, the security researchers contacted affected organizations with information on how to defend themselves going forward.

Brad Jones
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
Apple will check your public iCloud links for harmful content, and it doesn’t rule out banning accounts
Public iCloud links now come with a content check.
iCloud Private Relay

I’ve sent more iCloud links than I can count. Still, I never once wondered who else might be looking at what sat behind them. Well, it looks like Apple has started wondering for all of us.

In a new support document, Apple confirms that iOS 27.3 will begin checking content shared through public “Anyone with the link” iCloud links for harmful material (via Apple). While the developer beta is already available, the stable build is expected in December 2026. 

Read more
Mac users will soon get the Dynamic Island experience without buying a new MacBook Pro
Your menu bar is becoming a live dashboard.
macOS 27.3 Live Activities showing music playback

A timer ticking, a song playing, a recording running: I lose track of these the second I switch windows. Well, it looks like Apple wants my Mac to keep them in view, and I’m all up for it.

Apple’s first macOS 27.3 developer beta, released this week, adds Live Activities to the menu bar of Macs without Dynamic Island. It’s hard to imagine the feature at first, since we’re used to seeing it with the Dynamic Island, but here’s how it works (and looks).

Read more
Pangram, the gold standard for AI text checks, releases Image 1.0 tool to sniff fake pics and videos
It can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set.
AI image detector tool pangram

Pangram, one of the most widely used and trusted AI text detectors out there, is finally releasing its multimedia detection tools to the masses. Pangram Image 1.0, which was previously available as a research preview, is now widely available on the web, through the company’s API, and via its eponymous Chrome extension.

The company claims its image detector can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set. Pangram also notes that it has improved the model’s accuracy over the past few months, especially against edited images, low-resolution pictures, and pictures made by the most advanced AI models out there. As far as the competition goes, TruthScan achieves an accuracy of 96.33%, followed by AI or Not at 91.38% and Sightengine at 88.33%.

Read more