Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Apple
  4. News

Apple's newest MacBook Pro seems to be getting very poor battery life

Add as a preferred source on Google

Very few people who buy a notebook express concern that they’re getting more battery life than they expected and more than the manufacturer promised. The reason is relatively simple — manufacturers estimate battery life using very unrealistic criteria, such as the number of hours a machine can browse simple web sites with display brightness on minimum.

The 2016 MacBook Pro line is a case in point. Apple provides an estimate of 10 hours of use in its marketing materials, a duration which is already less than previous models given the new machines’ incredible thinness. However, the new MacBook Pros are not just suffering from the usual moderate letdown, but rather many users aren’t getting reasonable battery life at all, as 9to5Mac reports.

Recommended Videos

According to complaints on Apple’s user support communities and at Reddit, many users are getting only a fraction of the expected 10 hours. For some, MacBook Pros are struggling to get more than six hours, and many are getting as few as three hours.

One Reddit user, for example, kicked off a thread by saying, “Hi, I’ve got my 15-inch MBP a few days ago and I’m pretty disappointed by its battery life. If I do nothing but very light web browsing in Safari and brightness around 50 percent I can get it to about 6 hours. But not even close to the 10 hours promised. Usually Apple is pretty good with the advertised battery life. Nothing unusual in the energy monitor. I’ve hear (sic) from someone else that he has a similar issue but from another person that he can stretch it to 15 hours.”

According to 9to5Mac, however, many of the claims are based on the machine’s ongoing estimate of remaining battery life rather than actual tests of how long the battery lasts. MacOS, just like Windows 10, estimates remaining battery life based on a number of factors, not the least of which is what the machine is doing at that moment, and so those estimates are notoriously incorrect. In addition, today’s CPUs switch power states more rapidly than in the past, and that, too, can cause estimates to be inaccurate.

Nonetheless, enough users do report poor battery life based on actual results rather than estimates that one of two things is likely true. Either the new MacBook Pro just doesn’t get very good battery life, or there’s an issue that Apple needs to resolve. Perhaps MacOS 10.12.2 will provide a fix for battery life issues just as it’s expected to resolve rampant graphical issues with the 2016 MacBook Pro line.

Mark Coppock
Former Computing Writer
Mark Coppock is a Freelance Writer at Digital Trends covering primarily laptop and other computing technologies. He has…
Apple will check your public iCloud links for harmful content, and it doesn’t rule out banning accounts
Public iCloud links now come with a content check.
iCloud Private Relay

I’ve sent more iCloud links than I can count. Still, I never once wondered who else might be looking at what sat behind them. Well, it looks like Apple has started wondering for all of us.

In a new support document, Apple confirms that iOS 27.3 will begin checking content shared through public “Anyone with the link” iCloud links for harmful material (via Apple). While the developer beta is already available, the stable build is expected in December 2026. 

Read more
Mac users will soon get the Dynamic Island experience without buying a new MacBook Pro
Your menu bar is becoming a live dashboard.
macOS 27.3 Live Activities showing music playback

A timer ticking, a song playing, a recording running: I lose track of these the second I switch windows. Well, it looks like Apple wants my Mac to keep them in view, and I’m all up for it.

Apple’s first macOS 27.3 developer beta, released this week, adds Live Activities to the menu bar of Macs without Dynamic Island. It’s hard to imagine the feature at first, since we’re used to seeing it with the Dynamic Island, but here’s how it works (and looks).

Read more
Pangram, the gold standard for AI text checks, releases Image 1.0 tool to sniff fake pics and videos
It can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set.
AI image detector tool pangram

Pangram, one of the most widely used and trusted AI text detectors out there, is finally releasing its multimedia detection tools to the masses. Pangram Image 1.0, which was previously available as a research preview, is now widely available on the web, through the company’s API, and via its eponymous Chrome extension.

The company claims its image detector can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set. Pangram also notes that it has improved the model’s accuracy over the past few months, especially against edited images, low-resolution pictures, and pictures made by the most advanced AI models out there. As far as the competition goes, TruthScan achieves an accuracy of 96.33%, followed by AI or Not at 91.38% and Sightengine at 88.33%.

Read more