During Microsoft’s Windows 8 launch event, the company paraded a variety of flashy new devices in front of us, and almost all of them featured a touchscreen. We’ve known for a while that Microsoft built Windows 8 optimized for touchscreens, but it was at this moment that I realized the next Windows PC I buy will have one — and I’m not sure that’s good news.
Touchscreens are brilliant. We wouldn’t have decent tablets, big screen smartphones, or cool interactive tools in museums without them. I use touchscreens everyday, and I couldn’t imagine not doing so.
However, I don’t use a touchscreen on my laptop. To be fair, my laptop doesn’t have one to use, but that’s because it doesn’t really belong. There is a lovely touchpad where I can make time-saving gestures, and it’s conveniently located below the keyboard. You know, where my fingers naturally fall.
I’m not against touchscreens as a rule, that is, except when they’re mounted vertically in front of me, ready to get covered in fingerprints, make my arms ache, or wobble about when I prod them. When they do any of these things, I’ll just go back to using the touchpad as usual, and question why I bothered to touch the screen in the first place. And unlike my phone and tablet, it’s not that easy to give the screen a quick buff up on my sleeve either.
Touchscreen laptops = 3D
Computers with a touchscreen come across as being a bit, well, gimmicky. Sales of laptops are falling, but sales of dedicated touchscreen devices, such as tablets and smartphones, are rising. Is it not just a ploy to try to restart the PC market by combining what’s cool with a struggling product? When Hollywood decided piracy was killing ticket sales at the theater, it introduced 3D to lure us back to the box office. It got off to an average start, but has trailed off now that people are realizing it’s a bit of rubbish, especially at home. Plus, like 3D equipment and software, touchscreen computer hardware comes with a higher price.
Others have also expressed concerns. The late Steve Jobs said “touchscreens don’t want to be vertical,” and described them as “ergonomically terrible.” Adrian Covert at Gizmodo dismissed them as “an ergonomic nightmare,” while Rob Enderle, on these very pages, wrote that a large, multi-touch touchpad — not the screen — was “a critical element” to making Windows 8 enjoyable to use.
The effectiveness of a touchscreen comes down to how you can hold it. Obviously, tablets work; and hybrids work because you can detach the keyboard. Plus, unusual devices, such as the Dell XPS 12 with its rotating screen, work too (in theory). All of these touchscreen devices work because you can hold them like a book, magazine, or a newspaper, providing versatility along with a proven method of control.
Laptops usually sit on the desk at arm’s length where you’ll have to stretch even further to reach the screen — something that’ll be even harder to do with a touchscreen desktop PC. They also have a proven method of control built-in — the mouse, trackpad ,and keyboard — which you’ll also find on all new Windows 8 machines. It’s almost as if Microsoft and its hardware partners have no faith in touch-driven computers.
Traditional control methods look quicker
Intel did some research into the public’s response to touchscreen laptops earlier this year, and published this video afterwards. Apparently, 77-percent of those interviewed touched the screen of the laptop while using Windows 8, despite being able to use more traditional methods. Leaving aside the results, which could be skewed by the novelty factor of a touchscreen laptop, at no point in the video did touching the screen look faster, more comfortable, or more accurate than using a good touchpad.
Windows 8 looks really exciting, but I’ve been told that extensive use on a non-touch laptop is frustrating because the OS is always encouraging you to touch the screen. This is not only bad news for anyone upgrading an older laptop, but also for people who work more efficiently using the trackpad and keyboard.
I’m looking forward to spending time with a Windows 8 touchscreen laptop, but I remain skeptical as to whether the act of touching the screen to do things will be nothing more than a quickly dismissed fad.
@james, no one is forcing you to touch anything lol, if you don’t like touch, just keep using your mouse and keyboard. (posted from a Desktop running windows 8 on a TV that is 10 feet from me using a mouse and keyboard)
In Amazon, under iPad Accessories, the 2nd most popular is a Logitech Keyboard, the 6th is a Kensington, 7th is another Logitech Keyboard, and 10th is some no-name brand Keyboard.
I have owned a touchscreen laptop for two years–a Lenovo w510. (I got this laptop because it has a powerful processor for business use; plus, the screen is wide gamut with matte finish, and I work a lot with photos.) I hardly ever use the touchscreen features, precisely because it makes little sense to move your hand from keyboard to screen and back. While I don’t have an I-pad, I have noticed that people who use them with an aftermarket keyboard tend not to use the touchscreen features so much while using the keyboard, presumably for the same reason.
ummm…. hopefully they made the screen durable enough to not break as with non touch screen laptops if you touch or press on it too hard it can break… hmmm fruit ninja on a laptop with touchscreen….
I’ve played with the Dell XPS 12 quite a bit, and it was the best way I’ve experienced Windows 8 yet; touchscreen when I needed it, mouse and keyboard when it came down to brass tacks. I’m honestly kinda digging the hybrid concept now that I’ve played with it, partially because the screen is close enough to reach with a flick of a wrist. Multi-touch touchpads work well, but a solid multi-touch screen works better, despite the need to lift your hands from the keyboard deck.
I’m going to buy a dedicated Win8 tablet or convertible very soon, actually, because touchscreens flat-out suck on a desktop, as you say. (So does Windows 8 in general, IMHO). It isn’t ergonomic whatsoever and I hate getting fingerprints on my desktop monitor. They’re just so less convenient to clean than fingerprints on a laptop! That being said, I’m intrigued to see if I start inadvertently reaching out to touch every Windows 8 desktop monitor I use after getting used to a hybrid with a touchscreen.
I think we’re broadly in agreement here. I’m interested to try all the options out, but remain skeptical on their effectiveness. If my mind is changed after using them, great.
Oh, stop your bitching admin
I suspect it’s like the UAC misery everyone loved to hate. If microsoft didn’t cause users pain with UAC (who then complained to their ISVs), the ISVs would never have written (no-admin required) compliant applications – and security on Windows would still be stuck in the XP era.
Creating user demand for touch means every screen vendor will be shipping touch eventually – so no OEM or IHV will be disadvantaged competing with a non-touch supplier (the $10 COGs increment that will bump prices initially by $40). Which benefits the developer ecosystem since we (windows developers) will eventually be able to assume that touch is everywhere in the environment – a virtuous cycle creating more apps creating more touch demand – and less developer concern about hardware differences – we saw the same thing with eventual standardization of network support, multimedia, and even screen presentation models in support of accessibility, including text to speech, etc. Touch is just the next “got to have it everywhere if the ecosystem is to thrive” (v. decay – given the competition where it already is everywhere).
I want a touch laptop but I don’t like the metro and ribbons.
it’s really not that crazy lol
0/10
While I agree a touchscreen laptop isn’t the greatest idea in the world, I’m curious how opponents of it feel about the keyboard attachments you can get for tablets like the iPad. Do they find a similar distaste for them, and feel it makes the experience suddenly cumbersome and unnecessary?
Using the iPad with a keyboard is just as awkward. It’s acceptable if there is no other choice — i’ve used it when away for a few days without my laptop — but everyday would be a nightmare.
The iPad has a very good on-screen keyboard(I’m typing this on the iPad; but it would be better if we could customize it, add more rows etc), so I don’t see the need for a physical keyboard(I don’t know about the iPad mini though).
Laptops typically have big screens(11.6″ and above), able to have a large on-scene keyboard, so i also don’t see a need for a physical keyboard. My suggestion is to either have touch screen or keyboard and not both together. Even on the Dell XPS 12, in tablet mode(screen turned around and laptop cover closed), it would be stupid to open the laptop just to type.
P.S: I just hope the manufacturers see this, what users are hoping for.
আপনি হয়তো অনেক কিছুই জানেন আবার অনেক কিছুই হয়তো জানেন না । জানার কোন শেষ নেই, যদি নতুন কিছু জানার আগ্রহ থেকে থাকে তাহলে আসুন..। http://www.facebook.com/pages/%E0%A6%9C%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%A4%E0%A7%87-%E0%A6%B9%E0%A6%AC%E0%A7%87-%E0%A6%85%E0%A6%A8%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%95-%E0%A6%95%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%9B%E0%A7%81/549301518429781?ref=hl
ভালো লাগলে LIKE , TAG & SHARE করতে ভুলবেন না ।