Skip to main content

New Intel Core processors consume just 7 watts

Image used with permission by copyright holder

In September of 2012, Intel announced that it was working on 4th-gen Core processors, targeted at a power envelope of 10 watts or less. Today the company moved forward its plan for that line of processors. They will remain part of the existing 3rd-Generation Core processor brand, and be available in a number of new convertible and tablet devices shown at CES 2013. It marks a reduction of more than half when compared to previous Intel dual-core parts.

To put that in perspective, the current generation of Ultrabooks generally consume 17-15 watts. The lower watt processors will be a bit slower, but the trade off is that they can also be used in thinner, more power efficient devices, and still be significantly more powerful than the Intel Atom processor.   

Intel managed to slightly beat its target by reducing the power envelope of some parts to as little as 7 watts. This is the maximum expected power draw from the processor itself, which means that the part will likely also consume several watts less at idle.   

Lenovo’s recently announced Yoga 11S is one example of the type of small, light-weight convertible that will ship with these processors. Acer is expected to announce a convertible ultrabook with a detachable display based off the new part, as well.

Intel has already begun to produce and ship the new processors. Laptops powered by them will ship throughout the first quarter of 2013.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
I tested Intel’s new overclocking tool, and it does AI all wrong
Intel's 14900K CPU socketed in a motherboard.

One of the most interesting features of Intel's recent Core i9-14900K is its AI-assisted overclocking. Available through the Extreme Tuning Utility (XTU), AI Assist is billed as the natural next step of automatic overclocking. It uses AI to push chips further rather than relying on a predetermined list of checks that Intel already offers through XTU.

That's the pitch, at least. But according to my own testing, AI Assist doesn't do much of anything.

Read more
I tested Intel’s Core i5-14600K against its cheaper sibling. Don’t waste your money
Intel Core i5-13600K installed in a motherboard.

Intel's new Core i5-14600K isn't a massive generational leap, as you can read in our Core i5-14600K review. No one expected it to be with Intel's 13th-gen CPUs already sitting among the best processors. The bigger question is if it's worth buying over last-gen's Core i5-13600K considering that both are readily available for around the same price.

I've tested both chips extensively across a range of productivity and gaming scenarios. The Core i5-14600K brings some minor improvements over its last-gen counterpart, but those looking to stretch their dollar the furthest are better off sticking with the Core i5-13600K.
Pricing and availability
An Intel 13th-generation 13600K Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Read more
I tested the Intel Core i9-14900K against the Core i9-13900K, and it’s not pretty
Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.

Intel's new Core i9-14900K is a tough processor to evaluate. It brings the same number of cores and the same architecture as last-gen's Core i9-13900K, but Intel asserts that the new chip delivers some performance improvements. Is that true, and is it worth ditching last-gen's flagship for what Intel claims is its best processor?

The Core i9-14900K fixes some of the weaker areas of the Core i9-13900K. However, as you can read in our Intel Core i9-14900K review, the new processor does very little to justify spending a higher price for largely the same performance.
Pricing and availability

Read more