Skip to main content

Want to add an SSD to a desktop Mac? It’s now easier thanks to third-party TRIM support

osx third party ssd trim samsung 840 pro
Image used with permission by copyright holder
TRIM is pretty much a mandatory feature for any system running an SSD, as without it the drive’s ability to inform the system about which parts of the drive are empty, write performance can seriously degrade over time. Because of that, most operating systems have supported it for years, but OS X has lagged behind. That is, drives that shipped with the Apple system could support it, but third party ones couldn’t. Fortunately that’s now no longer the case.

Previously if you tried to upgrade your OS X sporting system with a third party SSD, it would have had to rely on its localized garbage collection system to maintain performance. However without the additional support from TRIM, this can degrade the flash cells faster than they would otherwise, so adding this new support for the re-allocation system is important.

Samsung TRIM error could be wiping data

This comes as part of the OS X 10.10.4 update, though it does need to be manually activated for the drives. Users can launch the utility from the OS X terminal with the “trimforce” command, and after a reboot it should work without too much difficulty.

Apple has placed a large warning label over this update, suggesting that users should be wary of using the TRIM feature on older drives, since it could cause them to behave erratically. While that may be the case, as Ars points out, it’s not something users should be overly concerned with. Most SSDs today are modern enough that they would have supported TRIM under Windows or Linux distros, so shouldn’t have any issues doing the same under OS X.

However, it is worth mentioning that a number of Samsung drives – specifically those named with the numerical 8XX moniker – have had issues with TRIM commands as of late, with some sources suggesting that they randomly delete data. If you have one of those, it might be worth taking extra care if enabling TRIM. back up everything important first.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is the Evergreen Coordinator for Computing, overseeing a team of writers addressing all the latest how to…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more