Skip to main content

Paul Allen patent lawsuit against everyone thrown out…for now

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Judge Marsha Pechman of the U.S. District Court for western Washington has dismissed a broad patent lawsuit brought by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen’s Interval Licensing LLC against a broad swath of Internet and technology companies, saying that the suit failed to identify specific products or services that infringed on Interval patents, noting that defendants and the court could not be left to guess about what products might be infringing. However, the judge left a door open for Interval to file an amended complaint by December 28—and that’s apparently exactly what Interval plans to do.

Allen’s Interval Licensing LLC filed the original lawsuit back in August, claiming almost a dozen high-profile technology companies (including Apple, Facebook, eBay, Google, AOL, and Netflix) infringed on its patents. The patents at issue include technologies that make product and content recommendations based on what a customer or site visitor is currently viewing—systems that are widely deployed across a broad range of ecommerce and content-oriented sites.

According to the Wall Street Journal, a spokesman for Paul Allen described the dismissal as a “procedural issue” and indicated the suit will be refiled.

Interval Licensing controls patents from Paul Allen’s defunct Interval Research, which closed up shop in 2000—the company was issued about 130 U.S. patents. Interval Licensing has been described as a “patent troll” in parts of the technology press, a company that exists purely to acquire and sell licenses to patents for technology it did not develop or use in products or services of its own.

Spokepeople for Interval have maintained that the patents at issue were developed wholly by Interval, and were not acquired from other parties. The company has maintained the broad lawsuit is to protect the company’s investment in developing the technologies. However, given that recommendation systems have been deployed on a broad range of e-commerce and content sites for well over a decade, one has to wonder what Interval has been doing behind the scenes to protect its patents for so many years.

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more