Skip to main content

Privacy Group Urges FTC to Investigate Google Buzz

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) has filed a formal complaint (PDF) with the Federal Trade Commission, urging the regulatory agency to open an investigation in Google Buzz. Google recently launched Buzz on February 9 as a social add-on to its widely-used Gmail email service and drew a firestorm of criticism from consumers and privacy advocates for failing to give users full control over what information was available to other Buzz users. Google has been scrambling to address these criticisms; now, EPIC alleges that Buzz not only violates Google’s own privacy policy, but also runs afoul of federal consumer protection laws and maybe even federal wiretapping laws.

google-buzz-gmail
Image used with permission by copyright holder

“This is a significant breach of consumers’ expectations of privacy,” said EPIC executive director Marc Rotenberg, in a statement. “Google should not be allowed to push users’ personal information into a social network they never requested.”

When Google launched Buzz, users looking at the services were automatically listed as “following” posts from people with whom they regularly exchanged email. Participating in Buzz also created a public profile for a user that offered a public list of a user’s contacts. Effectively, Buzz published a list of names that represented a users’ most common email contacts.

EPIC argues that leveraging previously-private email address book contacts to compile a social network violates users’ privacy expectations, Google’s own terms of service, and constitute unfair and deceptive trade practices. According to EPIC’s complaint, the organization wants Google to make Buzz a fully opt-in-only service, and fully disclose that profiles and connections would be accessible to everyone. EPIC also argues a user’s personal address book—data which users have not consented to have published—should not be used as the basis for forming connections on Google Buzz.

Google has been drawing increasing criticism for retaining sensitive data about its users and overly sharing that data with the broader world. Although some users of the broader social Internet are clearly fine with that—Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg has declared online privacy is not a social norm—there are also clearly instances where automatic collection and sharing of information from things like address books can cause material harm. As one anonymous blogger “Harriet Jacobs” wrote in response to Google Buzz: “I use my private Gmail account to email my boyfriend and my mother. There’s a BIG drop-off between them and my other ‘most frequent’ contacts. You know who my third most frequent contact is? My abusive ex-husband.”

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Privacy groups slam Zoom’s plans to monitor your emotions
A person conducting a Zoom call on a laptop while sat at a desk.

Imagine you’re on a video call with your boss. You’re tired and stressed, but you’re trying to hold things together and be as professional as possible given the circumstances. Now imagine your boss knows all this because they have an app that is actively monitoring your mood and feeding back about your emotional state in real time. They know how you’re feeling even if you don’t say it. Their software is scanning and watching.

This might sound dystopian but could soon become a reality. Companies are already working on adding emotional analysis to their apps, and it’s something video-conferencing app Zoom is also considering, although it hasn’t yet put it into action. A group of 28 privacy-focused organizations is trying to make Zoom change course and abandon the project.

Read more
Google has a new plan to replace cookies. Will it work?
Google Logo

In 2021, Google pulled the trigger on its grand plan to get rid of cookies -- a fundamental but problematic part of the internet as we know it -- and replace them with a new “privacy-first alternative” called Federated Learning of Cohorts, or FLoC. In theory, it was a great idea, but unfortunately, the scheme didn’t pan out nearly as well as Google had hoped.

Mired in regulatory troubles and industry backlash, Google aborted FLoC in January 2022 -- but it’s not calling it quits just yet. It’s already back with a refreshed proposal called Topics, and it might be the company’s last shot at taking the reins of the “post-third-party cookie world” before its set 2023 deadline.

Read more
Google is making it easier to save Tab Groups in Chrome
Google Chrome opened on a laptop.

Google is updating one of the most useful features of its popular Chrome web browser. It might soon be possible to save Tab Groups, so you can quickly get back to them after you exit your browsing session.

As noted by @Leopeva64 on Twitter, this new functionality is not yet available outside of a flag. However, once it is ready to roll out to everyone in a future Chrome release, a new "Save Group" toggle will appear as an option in the drop-down menu that is visible in the Tab Group box itself.

Read more