<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rambus Beats FTC On Appeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/rambus-beats-ftc-on-appeal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/rambus-beats-ftc-on-appeal/</link>
	<description>Upgrade Your Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:06:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Worden</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/rambus-beats-ftc-on-appeal/#comment-56188</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Worden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-56188</guid>
		<description>This &quot;ugly precedent for standards organizations&quot; could have easily been avoided. As an earlier CAFC appeals court ruling pointed out, the JEDEC patent policy had a &quot;staggering lack of defining details. When direct competitors participate in an open standards committee, their work necessitates a written patent policy with clear guidance on the committee’s intellectual property position. A policy that does not define clearly what, when, how, and to whom the members must disclose does not provide a firm basis for the disclosure duty...&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8220;ugly precedent for standards organizations&#8221; could have easily been avoided. As an earlier CAFC appeals court ruling pointed out, the JEDEC patent policy had a &#8220;staggering lack of defining details. When direct competitors participate in an open standards committee, their work necessitates a written patent policy with clear guidance on the committee’s intellectual property position. A policy that does not define clearly what, when, how, and to whom the members must disclose does not provide a firm basis for the disclosure duty&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
