<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruling May Curtail Software Patents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ruling-may-curtail-software-patents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ruling-may-curtail-software-patents/</link>
	<description>Upgrade Your Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:06:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Nowotarski</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ruling-may-curtail-software-patents/#comment-57591</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Nowotarski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 05:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-57591</guid>
		<description>The biggest winners from the Bilski decision might be technology consultants.  As a US patent agent specializing in business method patents, one of the strategies I&#039;ve emphasized for financial professionals seeking a patent is for them to spend a little extra money to hire a technology consultant (e.g. actuary, IT professional, etc.) to spec out the technical implementation of their inventions.  We then include those specifications in the patent application with the tech consultant as a coinventor.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The strategy has been very successful and with Bilski taking such a strong stand on the importance of tying a new financial invention to a &quot;particular machine&quot;, it should be even more so in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest winners from the Bilski decision might be technology consultants.  As a US patent agent specializing in business method patents, one of the strategies I&#039;ve emphasized for financial professionals seeking a patent is for them to spend a little extra money to hire a technology consultant (e.g. actuary, IT professional, etc.) to spec out the technical implementation of their inventions.  We then include those specifications in the patent application with the tech consultant as a coinventor.  </p>
<p>The strategy has been very successful and with Bilski taking such a strong stand on the importance of tying a new financial invention to a &#8220;particular machine&#8221;, it should be even more so in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Feigin, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ruling-may-curtail-software-patents/#comment-57592</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Feigin, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-57592</guid>
		<description>For some quotes and analysis in context on what the case actually says, see patentlawny.com/index.php/business-method-patents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some quotes and analysis in context on what the case actually says, see patentlawny.com/index.php/business-method-patents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
