<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.digitaltrends.com/xml/digitaltrends.xsd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung&#8217;s Q1 Ultra Gives UMPC One More Try</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/samsungs-q1-ultra-gives-umpc-one-more-try/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/samsungs-q1-ultra-gives-umpc-one-more-try/</link>
	<description>Digital Trends is your home for technology news, CE product reviews, mobile app reviews and daily videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:55:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/samsungs-q1-ultra-gives-umpc-one-more-try/#comment-54239</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-54239</guid>
		<description>To chicagouser:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for finding this error, I corrected it to say Q4 &#039;07 instead of 2008. The person who posted the text on the video page got the year wrong, and the writer (Geoff Duncan) of this story was using that as a reference. It has been fixed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And for reference, the Samsung rep in the video says Q4, Samsung ramped up the launch date to Q1 of this year.&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To chicagouser:</p>
<p>Thanks for finding this error, I corrected it to say Q4 &#039;07 instead of 2008. The person who posted the text on the video page got the year wrong, and the writer (Geoff Duncan) of this story was using that as a reference. It has been fixed.</p>
<p>And for reference, the Samsung rep in the video says Q4, Samsung ramped up the launch date to Q1 of this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chicagouser</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/samsungs-q1-ultra-gives-umpc-one-more-try/#comment-54238</link>
		<dc:creator>chicagouser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-54238</guid>
		<description>Site has it wrong.  The Samsung Q1 product (with 32gb solid state hard drive -- flash) is available now and is priced at 1899.  Not 4th quarter 2008 or priced at 1999, as wrongly stated by Digital Trends.  See cdw&#039;s website.   &lt;a href=&quot;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1137265&quot;&quot;&gt;http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1137265&quot;&lt;/a&gt; title=&quot;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1137265&quot;&quot;&gt;http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1137265&quot;&lt;/a&gt; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=...&quot;&gt;http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NOTE:  This is the current version of Q1 (not the upcoming Ultra model), but if you view Digital Trends video link above -- this is the very same model they are showing and wrongly stating won&#039;t be out until end of 2008 and priced at 1999.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are going to run a technology information site, Digital Trends, please get your facts straight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you.&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site has it wrong.  The Samsung Q1 product (with 32gb solid state hard drive &#8212; flash) is available now and is priced at 1899.  Not 4th quarter 2008 or priced at 1999, as wrongly stated by Digital Trends.  See cdw&#039;s website.   <a href="<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1137265""></a><a href="http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1137265" rel="nofollow">http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1137265</a>&#8220; title=&#8221;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1137265""></a><a href="http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1137265" rel="nofollow">http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1137265</a>&#8220; target=&#8221;_blank&#8221; rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=...">http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=&#8230;</a></p>
<p>NOTE:  This is the current version of Q1 (not the upcoming Ultra model), but if you view Digital Trends video link above &#8212; this is the very same model they are showing and wrongly stating won&#039;t be out until end of 2008 and priced at 1999.</p>
<p>If you are going to run a technology information site, Digital Trends, please get your facts straight.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/samsungs-q1-ultra-gives-umpc-one-more-try/#comment-54237</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-54237</guid>
		<description>Looks like a PSP with a qwerty keyboard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a PSP with a qwerty keyboard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/samsungs-q1-ultra-gives-umpc-one-more-try/#comment-54236</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com#comment-54236</guid>
		<description>I like that this new Q1 is thinner, but the design is pretty bland IMO. What do you guys think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that this new Q1 is thinner, but the design is pretty bland IMO. What do you guys think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via cdn.digitaltrends.com

Served from: www.digitaltrends.com @ 2012-02-16 12:07:06 -->
