Skip to main content

Skype’s time at Slack may be done, service to push its own VOIP tools

slack to get much more personal with voice and video chat slack01
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Slack, as a platform for helping large teams of people work together on collaborative projects and keep up with each other’s progress, has proven a huge success. Now, though, it wants a bigger piece of the workspace pie and is looking to take on Google and Skype to do it. The next iteration of Slack is going to begin testing native voice and video chat.

Announced at the Slack customer conference in San Francisco, the team communication tool is growing at a steady pace and has now reached more than 2.3 regular users, which represents a growth of around 15 percent since the end of 2015.

That growth is only expected to continue with new ways to chat among staffers added to the service. The voice chat side will come first, with the ability for users to switch from chatting via text to a VOIP call at the click of a button. Slack no doubt hopes that this can help supplant its own integration with Skype, though the Microsoft service has at least shown demand for the voice call service.

Video calling will come later down the pipeline, but it’s still something on Slack’s to-do list. Details on how it will be integrated were relatively thin, but TechCrunch does report that Slack may look into transcribing voice and video calls for later scrutiny as well.

Beyond these new communication standards, Slack is also looking to integrate better what-you-see-is-what-you-get tools, so that formatting does not sully whatever work a message is copied into. It is also driving the shared channels feature forward, making it easier for different teams at companies to cross-communicate with one another.

That should also make it easier to communicate with external organizations like PR agencies, which you may not want to grant deep access to internal chats, but with whom you may need to communicate regularly.

Does your organization use Slack as a major communication tool?

Editors' Recommendations

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is the Evergreen Coordinator for Computing, overseeing a team of writers addressing all the latest how to…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more