<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spam Fighting Guidelines Published</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/spam-fighting-guidelines-published/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/spam-fighting-guidelines-published/</link>
	<description>Upgrade Your Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:30:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/spam-fighting-guidelines-published/#comment-56918</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-56918</guid>
		<description>And you think by changing port #s... this&#039;ll help?  Yes, most mail servers primarily use this port, but do you really think spammers won&#039;t find a way to get your new port?  Seems like a silly solution to me.  Port scanning has been around for over a decade and this process has only increased in effectiveness.  What they need to do is develop a better way of tracing spam mails to the source.  Affected computers on botnets should be recognized and taken offline/patched/cleaned.  Why isn&#039;t this being done now?  People should become more aware of how to protect their computers from being hacked/rooted.  Admins in the workplace should be doing their jobs... they should know how security works and they should stop using Microsoft servers... &#039;nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you think by changing port #s&#8230; this&#039;ll help?  Yes, most mail servers primarily use this port, but do you really think spammers won&#039;t find a way to get your new port?  Seems like a silly solution to me.  Port scanning has been around for over a decade and this process has only increased in effectiveness.  What they need to do is develop a better way of tracing spam mails to the source.  Affected computers on botnets should be recognized and taken offline/patched/cleaned.  Why isn&#039;t this being done now?  People should become more aware of how to protect their computers from being hacked/rooted.  Admins in the workplace should be doing their jobs&#8230; they should know how security works and they should stop using Microsoft servers&#8230; &#039;nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
