<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.digitaltrends.com/xml/digitaltrends.xsd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SSL Web Security Protocol Compromised by Researchers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ssl-web-security-protocol-compromised-by-researchers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ssl-web-security-protocol-compromised-by-researchers/</link>
	<description>Digital Trends is your home for technology news, CE product reviews, mobile app reviews and daily videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 04:41:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph A&#39;Deo</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ssl-web-security-protocol-compromised-by-researchers/#comment-61395</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph A&#39;Deo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaltrends.com/?p=61744#comment-61395</guid>
		<description>Agreed that this needs fixin&#039;, but at VeriSign we don&#039;t see this as &quot;Earth shattering&quot; (to use Tim Callan&#039;s words). The vulnerability will mostly be a development issue, and since there&#039;s no way credentials or sensitive info could get hijacked there&#039;s no need for consumers to be too concerned. Of course, the larger, more valid issue is that browsers are in constant need of updating where security is concerned...and one should always do their banking and shopping on robustly encrypted sites (for example, those that use extended validation ssl).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed that this needs fixin&#39;, but at VeriSign we don&#39;t see this as &#8220;Earth shattering&#8221; (to use Tim Callan&#39;s words). The vulnerability will mostly be a development issue, and since there&#39;s no way credentials or sensitive info could get hijacked there&#39;s no need for consumers to be too concerned. Of course, the larger, more valid issue is that browsers are in constant need of updating where security is concerned&#8230;and one should always do their banking and shopping on robustly encrypted sites (for example, those that use extended validation ssl).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via cdn.digitaltrends.com

Served from: www.digitaltrends.com @ 2012-02-16 21:10:29 -->
