facebook-american-diabetes-association-page

A new Harvard study finds that Facebook may not be an accurate place to look up medical information, especially diabetes.

In a CVS Caremark study revealing the obvious, Harvard University, Brigham, and Women’s Hospital researchers have found that social networks are not a good place to search for health information. Focusing on diabetes, the researchers examined the 15 largest Facebook communities dedicated to the disease. These communities averaged 9,289 members; 690 wall postings from 480 unique users were studied. Most of the postings were by people sharing personal stories on how to cope or pushing off-market drugs.

Here’s how it breaks down:

  • 66 percent of posts described personal experiences living with diabetes.
  • 24 percent shared information that researchers deemed unlikely to be shared with a doctor, like alcohol and carbohydrate management.
  • 29 percent of posts were intended to show emotional support.
  • 13 percent provided specific feedback to information requests.
  • 27 percent of posts were promoting non-FDA approved products, sometimes with personal testimonials

“Social media is an evolving forum that clearly is attractive to people looking to share information and to find support and strategies for living with chronic disease,” said Troyen A. Brennan, MD, MPH, executive vice president and chief medical officer of CVS Caremark. “This study shows the many ways that patients are benefitting from social networks but it is critically important for patients to understand the need for fact-checking.”

While the fact that a quarter of posts are promoting products is disturbing, little else should be of surprise to those who understand social media. Facebook communities, like any online community, are designed to allow individuals to communicate with others who share their interest (or disease). Sharing personal experiences is perfectly normal. It is, of course, important to be careful what information you trust from the web. You never do know exactly who gave it to you.

Have you discussed health topics on Facebook? Is it a good place for this kind of thing? Is it even safe to use computers to look up health information? After all, computers may be killing you.

Showing 4 comments

  1. ZungHow at 6:58am 3rd November 2010 Thats downright scary when you think about it dude. web-privacy.edu.tc
  2. Sur Draw at 6:31am 3rd November 2010 I think the stats speak for themselves and in fact support you comment. It is the personal experience and connectedness that people are looking for and amongst the commentary from the public there is mis-information. Even though the study shows Facebook is not a place to search for medical information (come to that Facebook is not a good place to search for anything) I think that Corporate Enterprise cannot ignore social media and the propagation of mis-information. So it makes sense for for facts for be accessible to be close to source of the locus of interest as possible. One of the biggest concerns of the FDA is to unsure fair balance around health information. Despite an observation that the Internet is not the place to get quality information more than 50% of all Internet users do just that - search for health information. Coming ready or not!
  3. andrew at 6:31am 3rd November 2010 No sh*t sherlock! we have got some real geniuses on our hands now. whats next? the cure for cancer? maybe a revelation about what color the sky is?
  4. Jangla at 5:17am 3rd November 2010 Wow - what an insight! The internet in all it's unregulated, data overloaded glory is not the best to get good quality medical advice that's focussed on your specific needs and issues. ::rolleyes::
Close Suggestion AOL.com relaunches website, emphasizes video and local stories
View Article