As it takes a potshot at Apple and Microsoft with Chrome OS, Google will probably end up shooting Android in the foot right before the critical holiday race.

This month, Google will launch its smartbook, a laptop-like product running Chrome OS that will compete with Windows netbooks, MacBooks, the iPad and a variety of struggling Android-based tablets. By bringing this out in the critical fourth quarter and creating further doubt around the Android platform for tablets, Google has created a huge Christmas present for Steve Jobs. The same decision undoubtedly has the executives that backed Android for tablets explaining to their bosses why they really weren’t stupid to make that choice. Let’s chat about why this is yet another Google Train Wreck.

Don’t Mess with the Fourth Quarter

There is a lesson that most vendors seem to have to learn at least once, some more than once, and that is “don’t mess around in the fourth quarter in the consumer market.” This is the highest volume time of year, and if you confuse your customers, they will simply buy from someone else. Launching a small-run product based on the Chrome OS in the fourth quarter will undoubtedly have people wondering about the longevity of large Android-based tablets, and those people will likely either defer their purchases, or buy iPads instead (which would likely be my own recommendation at this point).

The lesson Google seems to be forgetting is that in the fourth quarter, all efforts should be on selling the high-volume products already you have in market, to assure your partner’s revenue streams. If you want to mess around, bring out something new in the second quarter so you avoid damaging fourth-quarter sales.

From familiarity springs failure

Google’s Chrome OS smartbook will effectively be an OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) PC without all of the marketing hype. The problem is that this could easily be seen as a “been there done that” offering, and bounce rather badly in market. If you look at Apple, which set the gold standard when it comes to bringing out a new class of products so far this century, the company goes heavy with marketing and builds a lot of initial lust around what is a relatively complete offering.

Google is basically releasing an almost alpha-level product, with promises that much of the rest of the solution will show up next year. In effect, this product is mostly for developers, and Google wants the developers to buy the offering and then, I guess, develop applications for each other, because end users who aren’t software geeks would be fools to buy it.

For a small additional fee (or if you buy an older model on sale about the same amount of money), you could buy a Windows-based netbook that would initially be both more usable and likely more reliable. So why would anyone in their right mind do this?

Google’s (mistaken) logic

By doing a laptop, Google is going after Microsoft’s and Apple’s legacy. This is very similar to what Microsoft is trying with Bing against Google. Microsoft has spent billions in product development and marketing; and the resulting product provides a very similar user experience to Google search with better results. After a massive effort and partnership with Yahoo, the second-largest existing search provider, Microsoft has a credible, though comparatively (to Google) small, market share.

To go after both Microsoft and Apple on their home turf would require a similar level of financial investment and a better product. This new smartbook doesn’t appear to come close to either bar. It isn’t complete, and the funding level is traditional Google, in that it will pretty much give the software away for free and leave the marketing to others. Given the take-up on iPads, I seriously wonder why Google is even trying to do a notebook computer initially, but it is likely to provide the company with an alternative to using Windows and Apple products themselves. Sun tried something similar with a product called the Sun Ray One, and given Sun no longer exists as a separate company I think we can suggest this won’t end well either.

Google’s smartbook is a dumb idea

From timing, to market approach, to actual execution, to demand generation, this product looks to be a train wreck which will likely do more damage to Android adoption on tablets than anything else. One of Microsoft’s historic problems is bringing out products before they are ready. Of all the practices to copy from Microsoft, I’d put this one at the bottom of any list, yet Google seems perfectly willing to repeat the mistakes from others. In the end, I think the Google Smartbook could have actually been great, but I also think Google is doing its level best to assure that it isn’t.

Showing 53 comments

  1. joe0507 at 6:47pm 11th December 2010 I'm not impressed with Google chrome
  2. alexcme at 1:08pm 4th December 2010 "Apple is peaking... they're seriously going down in the creativity department" - am I missing something? Just ask your kids, neighbors or parents; what is the most desirable gift these holidays? Is it Android/Chrome or Ipod/Iphone ? My kids don't have a damn about how "great" OS is, google/linux fanboys just wake up and stop waining about "features & future", you have what you have - nothing :)
  3. Jim at 6:52pm 18th November 2010 Apple is peaking... they're seriously going down in the creativity department. The iPad was successful based on the hype of apple's previous merits; it's not even that great of a product, especially since, like everything else, it costs so much. However problematic chrome os is, it's a valid attempt at doing something entirely different, which will pay off. M$ is losing its success because it's stuck in the past, Apple is succeeding (for now) because it can see in the near-future, but Google will succeed because it's looking very far into the future. People are just having a hard time accepting the fact that privacy is dead and hard drives won't last. The world is moving into the web, and Google is already preparing itself for that. All it has to do is hold on while it waits.
  4. nomoreintel at 4:11pm 6th November 2010 Rob, if they are only shipping 70k units total, then how could this have much of a negative effect on Android or Chrome OS?? I do agree that the OS (at least what I have checked out from their repo) is not super baked, and crashes a bit on me, its also pretty short on features. But unlike a phone, you can actually afford to have this happen a little. Their already is an app store in place - this will increase the richness of the OS quickly. With only 70k units going out total, it will be purely early adopters. I just can't see how much of your argument here about how "bad" it all is, really holds up. Sorry.
    1. ioman at 11:04pm 6th November 2010 So if you are arguing its meant for early adopters, then you should be able to understand why Rob is saying that this Google Smartbook would confuse the normal consumer. I think you guys are both on parallel agreements and you just don't realize it. :)
      1. Ian Thompson at 9:05pm 11th November 2010 It's new tech. It always confuses the market. That is good for the market. Sure some more traditional, non-bleeding edgers with go with a traditional M$ or Apple product and that is fine. This is about shaking the cockles of the common man and introducing the future of computing. There is no better time to do that then the 4th quarter. You can't get better press than this, and naysayers like yourself only make it better. So please continue to talk about it and when you confuse the right people, I will step show them how to make sense of it and profit in the long run. Again, I will say it. This IS the future; get ready for it.
  5. MPS at 8:27am 6th November 2010 The author is Enderle the same guy who "saw the copied SCO code in Linux" with his own eyes, the same guy who announced that HD-DVD had won over Bluray just months before Toshiba dropped HD-DVD. I believe the guy is a PR agent, nothing more.
    1. ioman at 11:35am 6th November 2010 He was also a fellow at Forrester Research, and Editor at Ziff Davis and the most quoted tech analyst in the U.S. Getting some predictions wrong doesn't mean you are clueless. If that were the case, Wall Street wouldn't exist ;)
      1. nomoreintel at 4:13pm 6th November 2010 Right, b/c Forrester Research is so insightful and un-biased. I get all more info from Forrester - that's why I started buy Apple calls in 2005, and ARM stock over a year ago. Give me a break.
        1. ioman at 11:07pm 6th November 2010 No sure how to reply to this. You don't have to believe Forrester at all, but they ARE a research firm that Google and Microsoft use to test new ideas and products before they enter the market. Forrester's responsibility is to provide research data to their clients on potential new products. Not sure how they can be biased..... Their goal is to provide as much factual information as possible. If they were constantly wrong on predictions, they would not have any clients now would they?
      2. Ian Thompson at 9:17pm 11th November 2010 Wow! That's great. At least he experience in failure. +2 for insightfulness.
        1. ioman at 9:50pm 11th November 2010 And +10 for having a real resume. Let's see yours. :)
  6. Jack at 7:44am 6th November 2010 Clearly the google is destine to fail!
    1. Oluvher at 8:29am 6th November 2010 Yeah, I bet they could be a winner like you. Poor Google.
  7. Oshungurl at 8:21pm 5th November 2010 Failed Nexus One? It was only meant as a teaser, a show piece if you like. At it sure did it's job. It planted a seed, and what a seed it was. Google aren't concerned whether this fails or succeeds in it's own right. It is once again seeding the market. Get a clue.
    1. ioman at 8:38pm 5th November 2010 umm yeah, that's why Google came out with more phones.... They wisened up and let the hardware manufacturers do it. Unlike Apple, Google can't do both software or hardware.
      1. Oshungurl at 11:29pm 5th November 2010 Google is a Software company, they don't do hardware. HTC built the Nexus One, you bonehead.
        1. ioman at 11:32am 6th November 2010 Duh. And Foxconn builds Apple's phones, Sony laptops etc. My point is that Google should not be selling hardware under their own name. You can bet that they had a say in the way the Nexus One was built since it was being sold under the Google brand. Just because HTC built it doesn't mean Google did not control the process ;)
  8. DavidOtazu at 7:34pm 5th November 2010 Google has the foresight to know that people are fed up with wasting time and money on computer maintenance. Most people want to do stuff that is web-based, even writing documents. Google knows that and they know that the trend will be in that direction for the next several years. This will be the first truly comprehensive cloud OS that is backed by a company with a heck of a lot of reputation for knowing how to integrate IT and make it easy to use. Everyone who says that this is an alpha product and doomed to fail are extremely short sighted and don't take into consideration that Chrome OS will improve dramatically as time goes on. Of course, it will be worse that other specialty software for a fair amount of time, but the masses don't use specialty software, they just want a functional, basic, maintenance-free system that will always be there. I also just don't understand the many people who cannot grasp the notion that the trend is towards cloud-based computing. That's what the trend was over the last 10 years. And broadband speeds will continue to improve while costs will go lower. Not everyone will like Chrome OS, but a very significant portion of the masses will. And they will be the ones to say, "Good riddance to the time and money expense of computer maintenance!" Of course, if their internet connection is down, that will be a bummer, but internet reliability will improve over time as well, especially with more people dependent on and demanding reliable connections.
  9. GoogleFAN at 4:55pm 5th November 2010 GOOGLE is not a traditional company. Google is a PHENOMENA. Your view is just right for traditional thinkers like you and Microsoft, but not for a company like Google. Microsoft is a dying old fox. Even if it tries, with people like you, biased, they cant scale upto Google. Google one day will become so big that the 2nd highest market capital for a company would be in 10th place. Now if you have any Microsoft shares, sell them before this quarter or else you will repent.
  10. @vinlim at 3:07pm 5th November 2010 Dude, by way of you writing, I have serious doubt if you even know the basic of chrome os. Despite some cross-lapping of android & chrome os, I'm pretty sure we can be seeing it unified one way or another in time to come. Every company does knows how to or where to position their products. And it is def not idiots running one of the world biggest corporation.I must say I was lured by the title of the post to see if it offer interesting opinions but was largely disappointed. This post has got no substance. Btw, u might want to change the post photo?
  11. MBA Student at 11:27am 5th November 2010 You may want to take business 101 again the product has been announced for two years people know it is coming and what it is at least their target market does because like the browser they know they need to get it into the hands of computer savvy people first!
  12. Rina at 11:16am 5th November 2010 With growing business enterprise shifting to google it is good to get a smart laptop.It is good for google chrome users,to get latest version of google chrome.
    1. Ian Thompson at 9:10pm 11th November 2010 Exactly. This has 2 effects. 1. It will just build "good press" for Google products. Which Google will welcome with open arms. Not everyone wants this, and that is fine. The people that do will run it through its paces and make it established tech. 2. The market that matters in the US (Business) are not early adopters. They want proven tech. Additionally, anyone that has ever met with executives know that they watch the PR newswire and they are interested in what is happening in the real world and how their business will profit from it. This is the future and as more companies (ISV and service providers) find ways to build products around this OS, big business will move there. +1 for Rina.
  13. Dizzy the droid at 8:45am 5th November 2010 Just think, in 10 years there will be only cloud computing except for those who need hard copies of everything like video editors. CD's and DVD's are going the way of the dinosaur. BD-R will be the only thing left until eveything is based on servers alone. Whoever has the greatest foothold will reign supreme. This is just the prep stage for all these companies. If a foothold cannot be established then they will fail. Every company is like a chicken with its head cut off right now. Budgets will be thrown off not to mention the techies needed to streamline all of this. Google Chrome has much potential. Just like the Ipod had developed into the iphone. They have to start somewhere. It's not like these ideas fall out of the sky. To bash Google for trying is like snuffing the American dream. Boo you!
    1. Bob at 9:20am 5th November 2010 video editing is a pretty niche segment anyways. And the shift will happen a lot sooner, 10 years is too long. Google is trying to push video editing/photo editing to the cloud too
      1. Dizzy the droid at 9:54am 5th November 2010 It will take a while to happen. Video editors would rather have a hard copy that they know will not be corrupted in their hands rather than in the clouds. I figured 10 years because the public does not want to change that soon. VHS is finally phased out almost completely but sparatic in areas whereas DVD's have been out over 10 years. It's just how quick the consumer want to change along with if the product is obsolete.
  14. ragulrao at 7:05am 5th November 2010 Google is doing a lots with the fun to you users now they tag with Microsoft and apple its a good and popular news for the Google chrome users,we are awaiting for the latest version of Google chrome.
  15. Ron at 6:07am 5th November 2010 With amount of business customers switching to Google as there enterprise it makes sense that they bring out a smartbook, that's my opinion!
  16. DSC001 at 3:52am 5th November 2010 I think, for Google Chrome OS is a small but important piece in the bigger context of cloud computing. Google want's to be a leader who has his appropriate share to decide what the future of computing is about and prevent M$, Apple.. to tune their OS's in a way that disrupts Google from it's revenue over night. Chrome OS netbook Version 1 is only another move to make Googles vision of the purely web based cloud computing environement, to come true. To mature the concept another 2 years might be needed. But think of windows V1.0.... The Tablets GUI is only a superficial, overhyped gimmick compared to the cloud computing tsunami comming soon. If market demands tablets they'll get Chrome OS tablets. But not this holiday season. This time is only for early adopters, people who are interested to have a close look at new trends in the computing industry. I'm convinced, in the long run when matured, cloud computing together with these simple browser based devices will prevail due to their clear advantages. Don't be so impatient.
  17. Charbax at 10:20pm 4th November 2010 This post dissapoints me. Thjough I've seen apple fanboyism on this website before, I didn't know Rob Enderle was a part of that. 1. Chrome OS is for laptops and desktops. Android is for touch screen devices. They are not disrupting each other. 2. ARM Powered laptops can run 50 hours on a small and light battery using Pixel Qi LCD, that's 5x better than Intel. ARM Powered laptops can cost less than half the price to manufacture and sell, to the point advertising itself can even subsidize some or all of the cost, imagine Google could nearly give them away for free or sell for $99 without a loss!! Chrome OS is going to be the best OS for ARM as it is so compact and optimized. Just a browser, that's it, and at full speed. Offline apps, multimedia storage and playback, even native code, 3D and full flash will be supported, means even professional video/photo/3D editing/rendering will be best on the cloud! Even all the 3D games will work. 3. Basically for $199 or less, you can get a sleeker laptop, better than a $999 macbook air.
    1. Charbax at 10:50pm 4th November 2010 By the way, I wrote that comment on an Android tablet half the price of the ipad, the Archos 70 Internet Tablet I reviewed more than 2 weeks ago http://armdevices.net/2010/10/16/archos-70-intern... , much better value than the ipad, with usb, hdmi, full video/audio codecs, bt tethering, webcam, flash support etc something the writers of a site like digitaltrends will never understand, blinded by their unlimited fanboying of the apple.
    2. ioman at 10:52pm 4th November 2010 Clearly you don't understand this website. Rob Enderle is as anti-Apple as it gets - in fact he bashes them every time he can get. I think everyone gets that Chrome OS and Android are completely different. But they are both new, and very similar in appearance. Enough so that by introducing both in the same year, and in Q4 for Chrome, is a major marketing/messaging no-no. People will simply get confused. Personally, Chrome OS will be a failure. No one wants a $199 netbook that does nothing and that is all these systems will do. People will either get a tablet, or a $399 netbook for more heavy duty things.
      1. lukev at 4:36pm 5th November 2010 You are underestimating the market of grannies who would never touch a smartphone, or even a full-fledged computer, but are perfect for the simple and cheap chrome netbook.
        1. ioman at 11:36am 6th November 2010 haha I don't think grannies even would understand Chrome. Most senior citizens are still familiar with the Windows OS (which has been out for quite some time). You think they are going to try and learn a new system? haha
          1. Ian Thompson at 8:59pm 11th November 2010 Grannies are familiar with Windows OS?!? What fantasy world are you living in. There are specific non-profits whose job is to take old computers that people get rid of and put a super lame, easy-to-use full-time app on an old Windows OS. Why do the do this? Because old people can't understand Microsoft and it's complexities. Comical. That is what your response is. ChromeOS is the future, but you may be too blind to see it. There is a reason that Apple has any market share at all. The reason; Elegant Simplicity(tm). It looks good doing something simple. This is what ChromeOS with do for the Operating System market. ChromeOS combined with free online GB with a gmail account for granny. It doesn't get any better. The world is getting to be a fully connected world and having cloud apps, cloud storage and an always on connection is where we will all be 10 years from now. Also, you are forgetting about HTML 5. This makes ChromeOS the most viable platform for the future. Online gaming, Online pictures, Online documents, Email all connected through one device. That is the near future. You better get ready. Or get left behind. That is unless you live in the boonies, in that case see you in 20 years when you catch up.
            1. ioman at 9:12pm 11th November 2010 I remember Linux at Wal-Mart. It was supposed to be easy to use and cater to a specific audience too. Those that simply wanted to get online or write an email. How did that fare? I am not saying it's not the future, we will have to wait and see. I just don't think it will succeed right now. Explain to me who the target audience is? Does Windows or MacOSX miss this audience?
    3. Jason Howard at 10:57pm 4th November 2010 Holy crap, are you seriously calling Rob Enderle a mac fan boy? muhahaha. Look at his other articles. He's known for not painting Apple in the best of lights. Personally, I think people are getting really keen on the idea of the iPad. So much so that I'm starting to see them being used all over, even with carrying cases with the built-in keyboard. I think people will opt for the android tablet over a chrome os netbook.
  18. Bryan at 10:08pm 4th November 2010 Your article loses some credibility with the comment "This is very similar to what Microsoft is trying with Bing against Google. Microsoft has spent billions in product development and marketing; and the resulting product provides a very similar user experience to Google search with better results." While Bing might have a nice user experience, they are still quite behind when it comes to relevant results.
    1. ioman at 10:13pm 4th November 2010 Not market share ;) Bing is gaining momentum.
      1. Bob at 1:55am 5th November 2010 mostly against yahoo and this makes yahoo bing partnership kinda pointless
        1. ioman at 11:39am 6th November 2010 Market share is market share! Google did have a gain last month due to the attention on their Google Instant. Prior to that they had consecutive months of decline. http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeq... http://www.ditii.com/2010/10/13/comscore-google-u...
          1. Ian Thompson at 9:15pm 11th November 2010 That's great. M$ has a good second place runner in the search market. This is still good for business and innovation. So let them gain market share. Google has proven that they can out perform any company on a straight line match up. Look at Android. For me, comparatively, Android is now where close to the beauty and functionality of iOS, but they are getting there quickly and gaining market share daily. They will not take as long as Apple to get the same functionality and market share as it has taken Apple with iOS. It's that simple.
            1. ioman at 9:50pm 11th November 2010 Yup, Google never has any flops. Google X Google Catalog Web Accelerator Google Video player Google Wave Wiki Search Google Audio Ads Dodge Ball Jaiku Google Notebook Google Page Creator Google Buzz I would argue that they are NOT out performing anyone in a straight line match up. Nice try though! +1 for Creativity :)
  19. guest at 8:38pm 4th November 2010 if there is anything to be learned from google's nexus one efforts, it's that they don't care about some introductory mba course wisdom on how to sell volume. they are showcasing what they got at the most critical time(s) of the year. as the 'failed nexus one case study' shows, google accomplished with a relatively small budget pretty much what others with hundreds of millions of dollars in advertising budget failed to do. of course, it helps actually having something that works. while i personally have no use for a netbook in my gadget arsenal, my money is on google not some misguided pundit living off penny-ads.
  20. idle reader at 8:18pm 4th November 2010 It would be helpful to know what the specs are on this Google netbook, what os and version it uses, how much it weighs, etc. Also the estimated price and if it is going to be in stores or just sold by Google to developers. And whether it actually exists or was just made up in photoshop. With that basic info it might be possible to figure out why this 'news feature' seems slightly hysterical.
  21. allHailGoogle at 6:11pm 4th November 2010 I thought you had some credibility with your chrome/ android argument, until you compared google to microsoft and sun. google has far more foresight than you - they can invest in leading-edge solutions and leave applications and marketing to the market. It works *very* well for them. Microsoft just imitates what's already been done. Bing is better than google? I presume you mean nearly the same, but newer?? I don't think google will ever produce "just another laptop" or "just another mobile phone" - google transforms markets like apple does. The difference is, google does it openly, whilst apple tries to control everything. My money is on google.
    1. Davegan at 7:10pm 4th November 2010 By the way Apple, Google, and Microsoft all pretty much "imitates", but Google will be getting off easy if they can even pull off "just another laptop" let alone even doing that. Apple has been trying to take on Microsoft for decades, Google doesn't have some magical bean sorry dude! Just repeating what you read does not come off well for you... The problem here is not that Google IS trying to compete with it's half baked product. It is that it is going to create confusion in their (Googles) product line, driving customers to more established platforms like Apple. The problem is platforms today are app driven, Google=Pick only ONE (Android or Chrome) Apple=Pick ANY or ALL (iPhone, iPod, iPad). With Microsoft flexing it's muscles for the first time in a while and Apple on fire, google can't afford the mistake it is making. Microsoft is going to, and has already started to take all of its OEM's back from google. Apple has already started the "freeze" on the Android platform, with rumors of the Verizon iPhone. The problem here is that Google is in way over its head, and is gong to get even deeper with trying to enter the holy war of the PC market. With all the talk about the iPhone and iPad, Apple is still untouchable with its golden egg (iPod Touch). Apple and Microsoft has got to be loving it right now. With Microsoft trying to break back into the Mobile market, what could be better then Google creating this division between it's own products. I would have to say Microsoft is catching a break. Apple is going to love the distract Chrome from Android, while Google focuses it's efforts where Apple doesn't need to (PC).
      1. Bob at 8:04pm 4th November 2010 google has the same sort of relationship that microsoft has with OEMs so I think chrome OS will do well. Apple is another case, their business model is different
        1. ioman at 10:48pm 4th November 2010 Google has nowhere near the same relationship with laptop/Desktop OEM's that Microsoft has.
          1. Bob at 9:18am 5th November 2010 OEM's will always be interested in google as a way to undercut the ever increasing windows license fees. The battle will be decided by consumers. If consumers start prefering android/chrome OS devices, OEMs will shift to it.
            1. Davegan at 2:56pm 5th November 2010 Linux has been an option for years and it has done very little to breaking into the PC market, what makes you think a different flavor "Chrome" is going to do any better. Not Apple or Linux including the google flavor is going to walk in with a half baked product and take it away from Microsoft. The iPad even has a very long ways to go!
    2. Zimmy at 10:43pm 4th November 2010 Never said "Bing is better than Google." His point is right, though. Even if Google does have more foresight, they shouldn't release an alpha product. It makes them look bad. My money is on Google too, given that Apple isn't even trying for the smartbook market; there's no comparison. However, I always said that netbooks would be DOA because of how useless they are. My dear parents back at home bought one. After a month, they never use it because of how terrible it is. Could ChromeOS alleviate many of those problems? Possibly. But not as an alpha. Ever. It will only give the product a bad name, which will take years to repair. However, I do agree that the connection to Android is far overblown. ChromeOS is a smartbook product for now, and Android is a phone/tablet product. I think people will see a disconnect.
Close Suggestion LaCie brings USB 3 to Mac Pros and MacBook Pros
View Article