<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu Defies Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ubuntu-defies-microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ubuntu-defies-microsoft/</link>
	<description>Upgrade Your Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:30:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: quazar</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ubuntu-defies-microsoft/#comment-54726</link>
		<dc:creator>quazar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-54726</guid>
		<description>Mr. Christopher Nickson, please do more research before publish this kind of junk articles. Indeed, here at Panamá (yes, Central America), we are aware and very clear about those SCO and Micro$of patent blah blah blah FUD! (and yes, we are using open source software)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Christopher Nickson, please do more research before publish this kind of junk articles. Indeed, here at Panamá (yes, Central America), we are aware and very clear about those SCO and Micro$of patent blah blah blah FUD! (and yes, we are using open source software)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ubuntu-defies-microsoft/#comment-54725</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-54725</guid>
		<description>The problem is that the SCO has fed so much misinformation out there, that all of these publications are reporting it. If Groklaw had a PR budget or newsletter, the press would know better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that the SCO has fed so much misinformation out there, that all of these publications are reporting it. If Groklaw had a PR budget or newsletter, the press would know better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ubuntu-defies-microsoft/#comment-54724</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-54724</guid>
		<description>@ R Peters,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are retarded. They came in and updated the story. There are soooo many news organizations that would not even do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ R Peters,</p>
<p>You are retarded. They came in and updated the story. There are soooo many news organizations that would not even do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ubuntu-defies-microsoft/#comment-54723</link>
		<dc:creator>R Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-54723</guid>
		<description>Why does Digital Trends News continue to employ Christopher Nickson, when he is so obviously wrong?  A simple check of the web would have cleared up many of the &quot;mistakes&quot; in the article (e.g., the Groklaw reference) Is accurate reporting optional? Please reply Digital Trends News!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does Digital Trends News continue to employ Christopher Nickson, when he is so obviously wrong?  A simple check of the web would have cleared up many of the &#8220;mistakes&#8221; in the article (e.g., the Groklaw reference) Is accurate reporting optional? Please reply Digital Trends News!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ubuntu-defies-microsoft/#comment-54722</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-54722</guid>
		<description>Looks like they updated the story to reflect new information. Thanks DT for following up on this. Props for that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like they updated the story to reflect new information. Thanks DT for following up on this. Props for that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ubuntu-defies-microsoft/#comment-54721</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-54721</guid>
		<description>This is another example of sloppy, sensation seeking journalism that impresses few. It is easily debunked, as previous commentators have done so well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-P.&lt;br /&gt;
New Zealand&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another example of sloppy, sensation seeking journalism that impresses few. It is easily debunked, as previous commentators have done so well.</p>
<p>-P.<br />
New Zealand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holt Wong</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ubuntu-defies-microsoft/#comment-54720</link>
		<dc:creator>Holt Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-54720</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s pretty worrying that a tech news site would make such statements about a study with little or no research as to the reliability of their sources. You clearly neither looked at the study nor got your information from someone who had. This does not bode well for your reputation and credibility as a news source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s pretty worrying that a tech news site would make such statements about a study with little or no research as to the reliability of their sources. You clearly neither looked at the study nor got your information from someone who had. This does not bode well for your reputation and credibility as a news source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xetheriel Angelknight</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ubuntu-defies-microsoft/#comment-54716</link>
		<dc:creator>Xetheriel Angelknight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-54716</guid>
		<description>As per Jenny Lyndross&#039;s comment above, here is the Groklaw story for all to read:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070619092336304&quot; title=&quot;http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070619092336304&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; ref=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=200706190...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As per Jenny Lyndross&#039;s comment above, here is the Groklaw story for all to read:</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070619092336304" title="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070619092336304" target="_blank" ref="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=200706190.." rel="nofollow">http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=200706190..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnny miller</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ubuntu-defies-microsoft/#comment-54719</link>
		<dc:creator>johnny miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-54719</guid>
		<description>do staff writers do any research at all? one asks in curiosity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do staff writers do any research at all? one asks in curiosity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ubuntu-defies-microsoft/#comment-54718</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-54718</guid>
		<description>The study also DIDN&#039;T say Microsoft had 280 patents infringed by Linux. It said it had a few that might or might not be valid. And now that the US Supreme Court has raised the bar on obviousness, those few claims may not be valid. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The study also DIDN&#039;T say Microsoft had 280 patents infringed by Linux. It said it had a few that might or might not be valid. And now that the US Supreme Court has raised the bar on obviousness, those few claims may not be valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
