nuclear-submarine-mod

An improperly redacted PDF has resulted in the accidental release of British and American nuclear submarine secrets.

A “technical error” has caused Britain’s Ministry of Defense to inadvertently publish classified sections of a report containing sensitive information about US Navy and British military nuclear submarines, the BBC reports.

Sensitive information in the report, which was published to Parliament’s website after a Freedom of Information request by anti-nuclear campaigners, includes how much structural damage British subs can take before a full meltdown takes place, as well as US vessels’ abilities to handle nuclear core failure.

The “schoolboy error,” as the MoD has called it, was due to improper redaction in the PDF document. As British tabloid the Daily Star Sunday, which first reported the gargantuan slip-up, points out, “anyone wanting to read the censored sections just had to copy the text.” This was most likely because whomever attempted to redact the document did so with the digital black highlighter, which simply covers up, rather than fully redacts, the text in a PDF.

British MP Patrick Mercer, who served in the country’s Army, said the leaked info could have “potentially catastrophic” results because the revealed information was “highly interesting” to the UK’s enemies.

Immediately after the Daily Star Sunday‘s report, the MoD removed the over-sharing document with a properly redacted one, and thanked the press for pointing out their error.

“The MoD is grateful to the journalist for bringing this matter to our attention,” said an MoD spokesman. “As soon as we were told about this, we took steps to ensure the document was removed from the public domain and replaced by a properly redacted version (PDF). We take nuclear security very seriously and we are doing everything possible to prevent a recurrence of this.”

Obviously, one simple way to avoid such a scenario in the future is to use an actual marker, rather than a digital one, to black-out text that should not be shared with the entire world.

(Image via)

Showing 23 comments

  1. Adam Ant Burgess at 9:09pm 18th April 2011 I wouldn't consider China an enemy, just, not an allie, by any means. If they were to attack the UK though it would be interesting to see what the US would do considering they owe China anything up to 900 Billion dollars
  2. Adam Ant Burgess at 9:09pm 18th April 2011 I wouldn't consider China an enemy, just, not an allie, by any means. If they were to attack the UK though it would be interesting to see what the US would do considering they owe China anything up to 900 Billion dollars
  3. Adam Ant Burgess at 9:09pm 18th April 2011 I wouldn't consider China an enemy, just, not an allie, by any means. If they were to attack the UK though it would be interesting to see what the US would do considering they owe China anything up to 900 Billion dollars
  4. Damon Schmitt at 8:29pm 18th April 2011 A 'schoolboy error'? As in, "the people we have handling this, are as competent as children"...? O.o And yes, I agree with the press releases - obviously this is going to lead to WW3, now that "Britain's enemies" can design better torpedoes, or some such thing.
  5. Damon Schmitt at 8:29pm 18th April 2011 A 'schoolboy error'? As in, "the people we have handling this, are as competent as children"...? O.o And yes, I agree with the press releases - obviously this is going to lead to WW3, now that "Britain's enemies" can design better torpedoes, or some such thing.
  6. Stephen LeatherFace Popa at 6:42pm 18th April 2011 They must have hired Julian Assange.
  7. Stephen LeatherFace Popa at 6:42pm 18th April 2011 They must have hired Julian Assange.
  8. Raymond Koh at 5:10pm 18th April 2011 Dude, dun forget China and also allies today can be your enemies tomorrow.
  9. Raymond Koh at 5:10pm 18th April 2011 Dude, dun forget China and also allies today can be your enemies tomorrow.
  10. Adam Ant Burgess at 4:24pm 18th April 2011 Maybe I'm just missing something, but I don't particularly understand why this is so "catastrophic"? Knowing how much damage a sub can take doesn't change much? Besides, currently our only enemies are poor farmers & peasants in the middle east...
  11. Adam Ant Burgess at 4:24pm 18th April 2011 Maybe I'm just missing something, but I don't particularly understand why this is so "catastrophic"? Knowing how much damage a sub can take doesn't change much? Besides, currently our only enemies are poor farmers & peasants in the middle east...
  12. Jared Jay at 4:23pm 18th April 2011 there's irony for you... "accidentally"
  13. Jared Jay at 4:23pm 18th April 2011 there's irony for you... "accidentally"
  14. Jared Jay at 4:23pm 18th April 2011 there's irony for you... "accidentally"
  15. Bruce Lee at 4:21pm 18th April 2011 Accidentally on purpose....
  16. Bruce Lee at 4:21pm 18th April 2011 Accidentally on purpose....
  17. Bruce Lee at 4:21pm 18th April 2011 Accidentally on purpose....
  18. Krystal Aguilar at 4:05pm 18th April 2011 with cell phones becoming smarter, I fear what information can be leaked through or hacked.
  19. Krystal Aguilar at 4:05pm 18th April 2011 with cell phones becoming smarter, I fear what information can be leaked through or hacked.
  20. Krystal Aguilar at 4:05pm 18th April 2011 with cell phones becoming smarter, I fear what information can be leaked through or hacked.
  21. Sais Shishir KS at 4:04pm 18th April 2011 lol
  22. Sais Shishir KS at 4:04pm 18th April 2011 lol
  23. Sais Shishir KS at 4:04pm 18th April 2011 lol
Close Suggestion Google undergoes housecleaning, Video and Tags services killed off
View Article